Broad leaves of baby melon reduce impact of raindrops on soils (Otto Richard Kawawa)

Baby Melon as a Cover-Crop in Lowlands (Uganda)

Pito kodi pi gengo wi ngom

Description

Baby melon (cucumis melo) is used as a cover-crop to prevent soil degradation

Baby melon, as a cover crop, protects soil from erosion and compaction due to rain drops. The cover crop also conserves soil moisture during drought periods. Besides soil conservation, baby melon is used as source of food and income to the land user. It is a vegetable crop which looks like pumpkin with wide leave and scroll on the surface of the land and has the ability to prevent soil erosion from run-off. The crop is also commonly grown along streams where it protects the banks from erosion, provides manure through leaf-fall, and reduces the risk of flooding by increasing the evopo-transpiration from its wide leaves.

To establish this cover crop, farmers use seeds, which is locally conserved from previous fruiting or bought from agro-input shop. Seeds are sown directly into a pre-cultivated garden. Usually planting is at a spacing of two meters. Planting is usually done at the start of the rainy season. Weeding, as well as pest and disease management is done the way pumpkins are usually managed. Fruits are harvested at a relatively early stage (~2 months after planting). A more juvenile fruit is preferred to the more grown one for its nutritional value.

The benefit of the technology is first for food, income and also for protection of the soil from the effect of running water and rain drops. The farmer obtains nutritious food from the fruits of this plant. The plants also prevent soil erosion and take a very short time to mature. When the plant covers an area, it reduces weed growth, thus reducing the cost of weeding. One disadvantage of this technology is that the pumpkins do not have a popular market and have a very short shelf life. Fruits therefore, have to be sold immediately after harvesting. The market value of the crop is generally low.

Location

Location: Koro Subcounty, Omoro District, Northern Region,Uganda, Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 33.39392, 2.23871

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Photo showing baby melon as a cover crop in lowlands in Omoro District, Northern Uganda (Otto Richard Kawawa)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland - Annual cropping
    Main crops (cash and food crops): Maize, Sorghum
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Land use before implementation of the Technology: n.a.
Livestock density: n.a.
Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wr: riverbank erosion
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Author: Amale Balla Sunday
Spacing between baby melon plants is 2m by 2m. This spacing enables vigorous growth and quick soil surface cover.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 acre; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = 2.5)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Uganda Shillings
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3498.0 Uganda Shillings
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Purchase of fungicides
Establishment activities
  1. Clearing (Timing/ frequency: Start of season)
  2. Planting (Timing/ frequency: Start of seson)
  3. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: One month after planting)
  4. Pest and disease control (Timing/ frequency: Throughout the season)
  5. Harvesting (Timing/ frequency: At end of season)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 acre)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda Shillings) Total costs per input (Uganda Shillings) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labor 1 5.0 5000.0 25000.0 100.0
Plant material
Seed kg 1.0 200000.0 200000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Manure Bags 5.0 20000.0 100000.0 100.0
Fungicides Litters 2.0 30000.0 60000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 385'000.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Spraying (Timing/ frequency: Throughout the season)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 acre)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda Shillings) Total costs per input (Uganda Shillings) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labor 1 3.0 5000.0 15000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fungicides Litters 2.0 30000.0 60000.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 75'000.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Name of the meteorological station: Gulu
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
x
increased

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Season: wet/ rainy season
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
tropical storm

not well at all
x
very well
insect/ worm infestation

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • A source of food and income to the farmer in a very short time (2months)
  • Income diversification as an adaptation strategy
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • No major technical expertise required since the crop is similar in many ways ot other traditional ones like water melon, pumpkisns, among others
  • The crop can be produced for several seasons with minimum watering since it has a short rotation (2 months)
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Access to seed is not easy since the crop is not widely cultivated Establish contacts with seed dealers and linking them to farmers or farmers groups
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The crop is highly susceptible to fungal diseases yet the pesticides are relatively expensive for low-income farmers. Farmers can form groups for collective bargaining to reduce the cost of pesticides or receive subsidies from government

References

Compiler
  • Bernard Fungo
Editors
  • JOY TUKAHIRWA
  • Kamugisha Rick Nelson
  • Sunday Balla Amale
  • betty adoch
Reviewer
  • Drake Mubiru
  • Udo Höggel
Date of documentation: Junie 11, 2017
Last update: Maart 23, 2020
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • N/a:
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International