Bamboo-woven bee hive, a low-cost option (Bernard Fungo)

Bamboo-Woven Bee Hives (Uganda)

Pito kic Ki Bong koo onyo Yen ma iye twolo

Description

Using relatively cheap and locally available bamboo material to make bee hives is adaptable to local setting and reduces harvesting of large native trees

In northern Uganda, traditional bee hives used to be made from large tree trunks chiseled into a hollow cylindrical piece of tree trunk. Owing to increased demand for more hives and due to extensive destruction of suitable trees, farmers now use locally available bamboo stems for making bee hives. This technology, apart from being a response to decreasing availability of materials such as large tree trunks that were previously used to make bee hives, it is also meant to provide a cheaper alternative to expensive modern bee hives such as the top-bar and Langstroth.

Bamboo canes are peeled into sheets of approximately 2-3 meters, and weaved in a manner similar to the way the baskets are made but in a cylindrical shape. The hives are constructed with a length varying from 0.5-0.8 m, and 0.4 m in diameter. The resulting open-ended cylinder is then covered with a grass layer of about 2 cm thick and wrapped with polythene strings to keep the grass in place. The grass is meant to insulate the hive against heat. The open ends of the cylinder are closed using a wooded circular piece of wood punched with about 10 holes of 1 cm diameter. It is through these holes that bees enter the hive. The completed hives are hung into a tree, where the bees colonize and produce honey. The hive should face north or south to protect it from the direction of sun and rain. The sun heat melts the honey comb from which honey is extracted.

The apiary should be free from termites, birds, and hygiene should be fully maintained. The hives may also be hung on two poles attached by wires that are used to hang them. These poles should be greased to avoid being damaged by termites, bush fire and red ants. The apiary should be 30 m away from the main road, flowering plants and also near water source within 100 m is recommended.

An apiary with bamboo-woven been hives conserves the natural environment and honey extracted from the honey comb generates income to the farmer. Shades must be provided at the apiary site during dry seasons. To protect the apiary, scouting should be frequently done. Bees are harmful and the apiary occupies land from other activities like agriculture.

Farmers like this type of hive because it produces relatively clean honey compared to other systems. Furthermore, the bamboo hives last relatively longer because they are affected less by degrading insects. The low cost compared to other hives such as the top-bar or langstroth make it preferred by the bee farmers. However, there is also a high risk of fire since the hive is fitted with grass that could catch fire.

Location

Location: Ayom Village, Abakadyak Parish, Northern, Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 32.95872, 3.5949
  • 32.95872, 3.5949

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

Date of implementation: 2009

Type of introduction
Bamboo-woven hive covered with grass (Otto Richard Kawawa)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Forest/ woodlands - (Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands: Selective felling
    Products and services: Timber, Fuelwood, Fruits and nuts, Grazing/ browsing, Nature conservation/ protection

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Land use before implementation of the Technology: n.a.
Livestock density: n.a.

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
  • physical soil deterioration - Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • natural and semi-natural forest management
  • windbreak/ shelterbelt
  • beekeeping, aquaculture, poultry, rabbit farming, silkworm farming, etc.
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S9: Shelters for plants and animals, S11: Others
  • management measures - M3: Layout according to natural and human environment, M5: Control/ change of species composition

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Author: Amale Balla Sunday
Length of hive: 0.8m
Diameter: 0.4m

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: One peace)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Uganda shilling
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3500.0 Uganda shilling
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Routine visits during the dry season
Establishment activities
  1. Cutting bamboo (Timing/ frequency: Any time but mostly during the dry season)
  2. Pealing (Timing/ frequency: Any time but mostly during the dry season)
  3. Weaving bee hives (Timing/ frequency: Any time but mostly during the dry season)
Establishment inputs and costs (per One peace)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda shilling) Total costs per input (Uganda shilling) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Harvesting bamboo canes Manhours 3.0 5000.0 15000.0 100.0
Pealing the bamboo canes Manhours 5.0 5000.0 25000.0 100.0
Weaving the been hives Manhours 15.0 5000.0 75000.0 100.0
Equipment
Bamboo canes Pieces 30.0 1500.0 45000.0 100.0
Strings Rolls 1.0 6000.0 6000.0 100.0
Baits Piece 1.0 10000.0 10000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 176'000.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Slashing around the beehives (Timing/ frequency: During the dry season)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per One peace)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda shilling) Total costs per input (Uganda shilling) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Slashing Area (acres) 1.0 30000.0 30000.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 30'000.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


Improve pollination of crop flowers leads to improved yields

crop quality
decreased
increased


Presence of bees in farm also deters other harmful insects that destroy crops or transmit crop pests and diseases

animal production
decreased
increased


As a livestock, it results into more honey produced

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


Bees easily colonize hives made of locally available bambo or stake materials within their environment

land management
hindered
simplified


This approach ensures integrated land management

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Cost of buying a hive is not incurred

farm income
decreased
increased


High yield of honey gives more income to the farmer

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased


Both from crops, animals and honey.

workload
increased
decreased


Easy to manage the bees since there is little need to put baits

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved


Farmers harvest adequate honey which is also rich in nutrients

health situation
worsened
improved


Honey contain high nutrient content and also acts as antibiotics against some infections

community institutions
weakened
strengthened


Through marketing of the bee products in farmer groups

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Farmers learn how to utilize locally available materials to make hives. e.g bamboo, ropes

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved


In areas near national parks, bee keeping reduces human wildlife conflicts because bees repel away wild animals from reaching the farm stead

Ecological impacts
plant diversity
decreased
increased


Pollination by bees improves plant diversity

invasive alien species
increased
reduced


Bees repel away some invasive insects from the environment

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased


Increase in bees as social insects

habitat diversity
decreased
increased


The habitat become more diverse and plant species increase

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased


Bees repel away some pests which infest crops or spread crop diseases

micro-climate
worsened
improved


Increase in plant diversity because of the presence of bees create a bio-diverse micro climate

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

The benefits increase with time due the number of products and the colonization of the hives

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: dry season
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
epidemic diseases

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Easy to manage
  • No additional cost after establishment
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • It is highly sustainable
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Fire Early clearing
  • Its a medium term investment Constant replacement
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Sometimes the hives may not be colonized Continuously checking

References

Compiler
  • Bernard Fungo
Editors
  • JOY TUKAHIRWA
  • betty adoch
  • Kamugisha Rick Nelson
  • Sunday Balla Amale
Reviewer
  • Udo Höggel
Date of documentation: Junie 17, 2017
Last update: Maart 24, 2020
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International