Front view of the rain water harvest reservoir structure and the home roof top. (Aine Amon)

Wooden water reservoir for rain water harvesting. (Uganda)

Okutagila amizi aha ibati

Description

A gutter system constructed on the farmer’s house-roof collects rainwater and directs it into a constructed reservoir raised off the ground with interior walls lined with water-proof tarpaulin. The reservoir has a maximum capacity of 8,000 liters of water; clean enough for irrigation, livestock and domestic use during seasons of scarcity. The reservoir is raised off of ground to minimize contamination and any possible accidents.

The wooden water reservoir system was introduced to the farmer by staff of the area's local government as a demonstration site to educate others on how to cheaply harvest and store rainwater in a relatively clean form for domestic, livestock and irrigation use. The farmer’s house was fitted with gutters to tap rainwater and direct it into the water reservoir. The water collected is used to buffer the water scarcity during the dry season, which normally stresses livestock and crops in the area. The water can be stored for as long as three months, depending on the size of the water reservoir and the use of the water.

The establishment of the technology requires a clean roof for collecting rainwater, gutters, poles, iron sheets, tarpaulin, hose pipe, jerry can and nails. Further equipment required include; a hammer, hoe and panga (large knife for weeding and forest works). At the farm in Kyegegwa, the reservoir is constructed 3 meters away from the farmer’s main house located at the top of a gently sloping hill. The establishment process involves: leveling of the site on which the technology is planned and constructing a water reservoir supported by a wooden structure. The support structure is constructed using four poles made in such a way that the two front poles are taller (5m) while the two poles behind are shorter (3m). This will give the roof a slight slope to prevent rainwater from stagnating on the roof. A raised rectangular floor supported by the poles is then established at a height of 0.5m above ground. The rectangular reservoir base dimensions are 1m×4m×2m (h×l×w) and is divided into 4 compartment. Each of these, lined with water-tight tarpaulin, can hold 2000 litres of water. The water so collected in the reservoir can be extracted under gravity through a 1.5cm diameter hose pipe into a jerry can placed below the reservoir.

The cost of establishment and durability of this rainwater harvesting system is mainly dependent on the type of materials and gutters used. In Kyegegwa District, wood for construction of the system is locally available valued at US$ 67.99 for the construction of the reservoir system. The iron sheets, gutters and nails are acquired from Kyegegwa Town where they are valued at US$ 127.28. The labor required is also locally available where it takes four men to establish the structure at a total cost of US$ 17.95 in three days.

The water reservoir is semi-permanent and can last for about 1.5 years depending on the quality of materials used. The maintenance activities include cleaning of the reservoir every month and repairing of the worn out parts at the end of the wet season. The farmer strongly recommends the technology since most of the materials and labour used are relatively cheap and locally available. The reservoir is raised off the ground to reduce contamination and minimize possible accidents with children and livestock. Despite the open space above the water level and the roof, the farmer has observed that the reservoir does not breed obnoxious vectors like mosquitoes. The water collected is relatively clean and the farmer uses it for irrigation of home gardens and for watering of livestock. When properly filtered it is as well used for domestic purposes. The technology can be improved by using treated poles, stronger wood material and tarpaulin of improved quality.

Location

Location: Kyeggegwa, Western, Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 31.016, 0.466

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

Date of implementation: 2015

Type of introduction
Front view of the rain-water harvest reservoir structure. (Aine Amon)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Settlements, infrastructure - Settlements, buildings
    Remarks: The farmer's house roof top is used as the rain water catchment area.

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Land use before implementation of the Technology: n.a.
Livestock density: n.a.

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification
SLM group
  • water harvesting
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S6: Walls, barriers, palisades, fences, S7: Water harvesting/ supply/ irrigation equipment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Author: Aine Amon
The support structure is constructed using four poles made in such a way that the two front poles are taller (5 m) while the two poles behind are shorter (3 m), giving the roof a slight slope to prevent rainwater from stagnating on the roof. A raised rectangular floor supported by the poles is then established at a height of 0.5 m above ground. A cuboid reservoir of dimensions 1 m×4 m×2 m (h×l×w) is constructed with wooden panels; divided into four compartments and placed on the rectangular floor. Each compartment, to hold 2,000 liter of water, is lined with water-tight tarpaulin. Water from the reservoir can be extracted under gravity through a 1.5 cm diameter hose pipe into a jerry can placed below the reservoir.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: Water Reservior volume, length: Capacity 8000 liters, segregated into 4 compartments)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Uganda shillings
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3638.35 Uganda shillings
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 20000
Most important factors affecting the costs
The nature of material used for example wood or metal and the labor hired to construct the system.
Establishment activities
  1. Site selection (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rain)
  2. Clearing and leveling (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rain)
  3. Erection of poles (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rain)
  4. Establishment of floor, walls and roofing (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rain)
  5. Establishment of taupline and gutters (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rain)
Establishment inputs and costs (per Water Reservior)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda shillings) Total costs per input (Uganda shillings) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Builders Man day 8.0 22500.0 180000.0 100.0
Equipment
Hammer pieces 30000.0 1.0 30000.0 100.0
Panga pieces 9000.0 1.0 9000.0 100.0
Dibber pieces 15000.0 1.0 15000.0 100.0
Hoe pieces 10000.0 1.0 10000.0 100.0
Plant material
Spade pieces 15000.0
Poles pieces 12.0 3000.0 36000.0 100.0
Timber pieces 12.0 10000.0 120000.0 100.0
Wood pieces 8.0 1500.0 12000.0 100.0
Construction material
Tarpaulin peices 1.0 45000.0 45000.0
Iron sheet peices 6.0 25000.0 150000.0
Nails Kg 4.0 6000.0 24000.0
Hose pipe Meters 3.0 3000.0 9000.0
Wood and poles Pieces 50.0 4900.0 245000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 885'000.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Cleaning the reservoir/ tarpaulin and unblocking gutters (Timing/ frequency: Twice in the wet season)
  2. Renovation of the structure (Timing/ frequency: Once a year)
  3. Replacement of the taupline (Timing/ frequency: Once a year)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per Water Reservior)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda shillings) Total costs per input (Uganda shillings) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Men 2.0 20000.0 40000.0 100.0
Equipment
Hose pipe meters 3.0 2000.0 6000.0 100.0
Jerrycans 20litres 2.0 9000.0 18000.0 100.0
Construction material
Poles pieces 6.0 3000.0 18000.0 100.0
Timber pieces 6.0 10000.0 60000.0 100.0
Wood pieces 5.0 1500.0 7500.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 149'500.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
The rain seasons run from March-May and Sept-Nov.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

crop quality
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

animal production
decreased
increased

wood production
decreased
increased

forest/ woodland quality
decreased
increased

non-wood forest production
decreased
increased

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

product diversity
decreased
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

land management
hindered
simplified

drinking water availability
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: None
Quantity after SLM: 80000 litres in storage by end of the wet season

drinking water quality
decreased
increased


The water stored in the tank is relatively clean compared to that harvested previously using the run off harvest system.

water availability for livestock
decreased
increased

water quality for livestock
decreased
increased

irrigation water availability
decreased
increased

irrigation water quality
decreased
increased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Costs on irrigation and income from extended growing seasons

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

economic disparities
increased
decreased

workload
increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved


Improved nutrition since the irrigation water supports growth of vegetables

cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
reduced
improved

recreational opportunities
reduced
improved

community institutions
weakened
strengthened

Ecological impacts
harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved

surface runoff
increased
decreased

excess water drainage
reduced
improved

soil moisture
decreased
increased


Through irrigation in the dry season

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased


The water facilitates dissolution of nutrients

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

acidity
increased
reduced

vegetation cover
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

invasive alien species
increased
reduced

animal diversity
decreased
increased

drought impacts
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
improved

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
extended growing period

not well at all
very well
Livestock and domestic water

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
  • Limited finances
The farmer improvised iron sheets as gutters to collect water from the roof into the reservoir.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Most of the materials are cheap and locally available.
  • The establishment process is not so complex and can easily be learnt by the local workers.
  • The tarpaulin used is relatively cheap and long lasting.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • The farmer easily benefits from 2 annual rainy seasons.
  • The system is raised off ground which minimizes contamination and accidents.
  • The water is kept in a relatively clean status for livestock, irrigation and domestic use.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • The water system is open to contamination. Need to construct a wall net to protect the water from contamination
  • The materials (wood) used are prone to destruction by insects which increases maintenance costs. Use of metallic or concrete poles
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The taupline is a temporally reservoir that needs routine replacement. Use of plastic materials or construction of concrete walls.
  • In case of infestation with insects like termites, the poles will suffer damage. Use treated wood poles or metal poles.

References

Compiler
  • Aine Amon
Editors
  • Kamugisha Rick Nelson
Reviewer
  • Nicole Harari
  • Udo Höggel
Date of documentation: Des. 5, 2017
Last update: Des. 13, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Rain Water Harvesting Handbook, Ministry of Water and Environment: https://www.mwe.go.ug/sites/default/files/library/Rain%20Water%20Harvesting%20Handbook.pdf
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International