Farmers on a slashed field (Amale Balla Sunday)

Reducing Tillage by Slashing (Uganda)

lum ajwera

Description

A minimum tillage technology where the garden is cleared by slashing and crops are planted without opening the land. Only the spot where the seed is planted is dug. The rest of the land is left undisturbed.

Soil tillage, which is practiced traditionally to prepare fine seedbeds and control weeds, bears several undesirable side effects that have forced land users to rethink and develop other sustainable management strategies such as reduced tillage or no-till (see photo below). Tillage as a practice damages soil and leaves it exposed to erosion, particularly by wind and water. Yet weeding using tillage methods is often laborious and costly. In parts of northern Uganda, minimum or reduced tillage is used to ease land preparation.

Labor is an important factor that determines the size of gardens that farmers can prepare and work on. With this technology, immediately after crop harvest, the field is cleared by slashing residues (weeds and crop residues) present in the field. It is a good practice to cut the vegetation before they produce seeds to ensure that few weed seeds germinate. After slashing down crop residues, planting holes for the subsequent crop are dug following the given recommendations for the crop to be planted.

This practice ensures that the residues provide mulch, which in turn reduces surface runoff and soil erosion. The decomposing residues provide humus and replenish nutrients into the soil. Plants can also escape harsh weather conditions since they can be planted in time. This technology is still new among the farming communities in northern Uganda, thus its proper use requires extension advisory support.

Location

Location: Nwoya district, Nothern, Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 32.2054, 2.52852
  • 31.99282, 2.57852
  • 31.87527, 2.53772

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

Date of implementation: 2015

Type of introduction
(Amale Balla Sunday)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • ensure early planting
Land use

  • Cropland - Annual cropping

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Land use before implementation of the Technology: n.a.
Livestock density: n.a.

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bh: loss of habitats, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bl: loss of soil life
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • minimal soil disturbance
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Grasses are slashed to ground surface. Only the spot onwhich the seed is to be planted is dug to create conditions for good germination.

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: acre volume, length: 30x160m2)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: uganda shillings
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3600.0 uganda shillings
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Farm labour, although this technology reduces the labour demand in general
Establishment activities
  1. Slashing (Timing/ frequency: dry season)
Establishment inputs and costs (per acre)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (uganda shillings) Total costs per input (uganda shillings) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Personnel persondays 9.0 5000.0 45000.0 100.0
Equipment
Slashes pieces 3.0 6000.0 18000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 63'000.0
Maintenance activities
n.a.

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Two rainy seasons in a year, dry season between December and March
Name of the meteorological station: Gulu Meteorological Station
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


More land can be opened

crop quality
decreased
increased


Better crop growth

land management
hindered
simplified


Reduced soil erosion

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Less expenses on land opening

workload
increased
decreased


Primary and secondary tillage reduced to just slashing

Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased


Grasses retain more water so that more water is in the soils

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

In real sense, this technology its not maintained but it is done each and every season for annual crops for land clearence

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
Season: wet/ rainy season
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
very well
insect/ worm infestation

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Reduction of labour demands
  • More land can be cleared
  • Less farm activities
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Reduction in soil disturbance hence increase in soil life
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • more weeds proper control of weeds, before they produce seeds
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Leached nutrients are not brought to surface plant deep rooted crops

References

Compiler
  • Sunday Balla Amale
Editors
  • Kamugisha Rick Nelson
  • JOY TUKAHIRWA
  • betty adoch
  • Bernard Fungo
Reviewer
  • John Stephen Tenywa
  • Nicole Harari
  • Luigi Piemontese
  • Udo Höggel
Date of documentation: Des. 19, 2017
Last update: Mei 12, 2020
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International