Fish Consolidator (Estrella Espinosa)

Social Enterprise (SE) (Philippines)

Katilingbanong Patigayon

Description

Social Enterprise (SE) aimed to provide social protection among its members and generate additional family income. Above all, this approach will encourage the conservation, preservation and protection of the resources available in the community.

Social Enterprise (SE) materialized because of the experiential processes conducted by the Sustainable Livelihood Officer. According to him, livelihood intervention should achieve the advocacy of the project, at the same time, relevant and suitable to the people living in the island and coastal communities. SE Approach was a result of the focus group discussions conducted in the community and livelihood consultations of the different stakeholders in the barangay level. According to the Local Government Code of the Philippines, Book III, Section 386 (a), A Barangay maybe created out of a contiguous territory which has a population of at least two thousand (2,000) inhabitants as certified by the National Statistics Office. Furthermore, Section 386 states that barangay is the basic political unit. It serves as the primary planning and implementing unit of government policies, plans, programs, projects, and
activities in the community, and as a forum wherein the collective views of the people may be expressed, crystallized and considered, and where disputes may be amicably settled.

Social Enterprise Project was determined using the following methods: resource mapping, identification of social enterprise project, planning and preparation which includes community equity fund, implementation, maintenance and monitoring, lastly, expansion and/or diversification of the implemented project. Once the enterprise is established, the organization will elect the members of their business management team. This is different from the set of officers typically present in every organization because business management team will focus on the business engagements only. The business management team is headed by the business manger, who will report directly to the president of the organization. The members of the team includes the following: treasurer, bookkeeper, purchaser and marketing team (if needed by the enterprise project).

The management team will receive 20% of the net income. Afterwards, the remaining net income will be divided according to the following percentage: 10% for disaster fund allocation, 10-20% for additional capital, and the remaining amount is allocated for individual member share. SE does not only focus on net profit but also the welfare of the community, its resources and social protection among its members. Social protection specifically means having disaster fund allocation per organization which is derived from the net income of the enterprise. This fund can be utilized by the organization before or after the onset of a disaster, depending on their agreed utilization guidelines. The sustainability components are the following: allocation for additional capital, depreciation cost for every equipment and experiential mentoring of the Livelihood Officer.

Based from the baseline study of DCW Project, Human Trafficking cases increased after a disaster. DCW project aimed to build resilient communities in order to combat Human Trafficking, however, conducting awareness sessions, coordination meetings with the local government unit and establishing HT referral system is not enough to prevent Human Trafficking. On the second year of the project, the project management team realized that livelihood component is the missing link in fighting against Human Trafficking. The body agreed that sustainable livelihood project means being adaptable and resilient to climate change. For the livelihood officer, group enterprise is an important mechanism in promoting adaptable and resilient livelihood project. This approach was granted to the People's Organization (PO) in the barangays who were organized or adopted by DCW project.

Due to the awareness sessions conducted, the organizations were motivated to join the advocacy activities like coastal clean-up and mangrove planting. They were also invited to join forums on the Solid Waste Management (SWM), referral pathway on Human Trafficking (HT) and awareness training on the causes and effects of Climate Change and sea level rise, since they are living in the island and coastal barangays. PO organizations serve as community partners of DCW project in facilitating learning sessions in the different barangays. Furthermore, DCW project provided inputs how to make their enterprise resilient and sustainable by being adaptive to the changing weather especially those organizations living in the island barangays.

Location

Location: Province of Bohol, Philippines

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 124.29421, 10.24326
  • 124.45359, 10.24778
  • 124.13549, 10.17994

Initiation date: 2016

Year of termination: n.a.

Type of Approach
Learning Session on Climate Change Adaptation (Ma. Venidez Gamale)
Livelihood Monitoring (Yunos V. Polo)

Approach aims and enabling environment

Main aims / objectives of the approach
Social Enterprise (SE) aimed to provide social protection among its members and generate additional family income. Above all, this approach will encourage the conservation, preservation and protection of the resources available in the community.
Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Membership of the organization encouraged multi stakeholder participation.
  • Availability/ access to financial resources and services: The People's Organization (PO) can easily access financial resources and services if they were already established and registered by the different government agencies. One of the determinants of the capability of the PO is having annual financial statement, minutes of the organizational meetings and resolutions made by the organization.
  • Institutional setting: It will facilitate to address the needs of the organization like capacity building, technical assistance and financial support.
  • Collaboration/ coordination of actors: It will make the decision-making process participatory and according to the needs of the majority.
  • Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): This approach specifically refers to Coastal Resource Management (CRM). The project implementer, People's Organization (PO) and the CRM officer already had partnership. Moreover, the PO representative is one of the members of CRM council to ensure legal identity of the Social Enterprise projects.
  • Policies: It will give directions and set the standards of the organization.
  • Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: The People's Organization (PO) already established linkage to the different markets.
  • Workload, availability of manpower: DCW Project provided Social Enterprise (SE) guidelines for business operation, financial management and monitoring of enterprise.
Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Having a weak or inactive People's Organization. If the PO does not comply the necessary requirements of the different government agencies and inactive in the different organizational activities, then, they will have difficulty in accessing funds.
  • Institutional setting: The bureaucratic procedures and priorities of every institution.
  • Policies: If the policies mandated were not agreed by the majority.
  • Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: The quality of product expected by the buyers is not met by the People's Organization.

Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
What stakeholders / implementing bodies were involved in the Approach? Specify stakeholders Describe roles of stakeholders
community-based organizations People's Organization The implementer and beneficiary of the project.
SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers Sustainable Livelihood Officer: Male, 59 years old Facilitates the implementation of the SE projects and provides technical assistance to the PO and project staff.
local government Municipal and barangay local government unit Support system through legislation and resolution that adheres the needs of the PO.
Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
none
passive
external support
interactive
self-mobilization
initiation/ motivation
PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer, Field Officers, Area Supervisors and representative of the barangay council. Activity: FGD, resource mapping, consultations and assessment of the organizations capability in handling social enterprise project.
planning
PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer, Field Officers, Area Supervisors and representative of the barangay council
implementation
PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer, Field Officers and Area Supervisors
monitoring/ evaluation
PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer and Field Officers
Flow chart

Capacity building on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Human Trafficking (HT) is integrated in this approach so that PO members will have greater appreciation on the preservation, conservation and protection goal of SE approach. The Sustainable Livelihood Officer (SLO) served as facilitator and guide of the PO in strengthening their organization and implementing their enterprise. He will also provide technical assistance, conduct coaching and mentoring sessions within the project term. Frequency of monitoring will depend on the nature of their SE project.

Author: Guillermo P. Bagacay
Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology

Decisions were taken by

  • land users alone (self-initiative)
  • mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
  • mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users
  • SLM specialists alone
  • politicians/ leaders

Decisions were made based on

  • evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)
  • research findings
  • personal experience and opinions (undocumented)

Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

The following activities or services have been part of the approach
Capacity building/ training
Training was provided to the following stakeholders
  • land users
  • field staff/ advisers
Form of training
  • on-the-job
  • farmer-to-farmer
  • demonstration areas
  • public meetings
  • courses
  • On-site coaching and mentoring
Subjects covered

1) Technical Assistance in drafting proposals and lobbying
2) Financial Recording and Bookkeeping
3) Value Chain Analysis
4) Enterprise Development
5) Occupational Health and Health Standards

Advisory service
Advisory service was provided
  • on land users' fields
  • at permanent centres
Institution strengthening
Institutions have been strengthened / established
  • no
  • yes, a little
  • yes, moderately
  • yes, greatly
at the following level
  • local
  • regional
  • national
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.
Some of the members of the organization are capacitated to become local champions. Local champions means they have the ability to facilitate learning sessions, actively involved in organizational activities and empowered enough to link and lobby with the different line agencies. While the leaders of the organization are trained to manage their organizations and social enterprise.
Type of support
  • financial
  • capacity building/ training
  • equipment
  • Seed Capital worth Php30,000
Further details
Monitoring and evaluation

Financing and external material support

Annual budget in USD for the SLM component
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.a.
DCW Project is funded by Caritas Switzerland and JTIF
The following services or incentives have been provided to land users
  • Financial/ material support provided to land users
  • Subsidies for specific inputs
  • Credit
  • Other incentives or instruments

Impact analysis and concluding statements

Impacts of the Approach
No
Yes, little
Yes, moderately
Yes, greatly
Did the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation?

SE approach integrates the lesson learned from their experience during Typhoon Haiyan and Bohol earthquake and sustainability measures of the community. This approach is localized to ensure that the project is suitable and adaptable to their respective communities.

Did the Approach enable evidence-based decision-making?

Yes because the planning process was represented by the different stakeholders in the barangay.

Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?

Yes because the approach serves as guide from planning to implementation and monitoring of the project.

Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM?

Yes because the PO members are now financial literate and underwent series of financial coaching and mentoring sessions.

Did the Approach empower socially and economically disadvantaged groups?

Yes because the women, senior citizens and persons with disability are members of the organization.

Did the Approach improve gender equality and empower women and girls?

Yes because every member has their shared efforts.

Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters?

It is because the goal of the approach is to establish sustainable social enterprise that can adapt to climate change especially that they are living in the island and coastal barangays of Bohol, Philippines.

Did the Approach lead to employment, income opportunities?

Resource-based projects needs additional manpower during harvest.

Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
  • increased production
  • increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio
  • reduced land degradation
  • reduced risk of disasters
  • reduced workload
  • payments/ subsidies
  • rules and regulations (fines)/ enforcement
  • prestige, social pressure/ social cohesion
  • affiliation to movement/ project/ group/ networks
  • environmental consciousness
  • customs and beliefs, morals
  • enhanced SLM knowledge and skills
  • aesthetic improvement
  • conflict mitigation
Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what hat been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
  • no
  • yes
  • uncertain

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • This is not an individualistic approach but a group effort in order to revive the "bayanihan" spirit (spirit of communal unity, work and cooperation to achieve a particular goal) and social awareness.
  • The People's Organization (PO) members underwent training like financial management, Value Chain Analysis (VCA), Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS). What made this approach different from their previous livelihood projects is that, the PO were guided from planning to implementation and monitored on a monthly basis to ensure the continuity of their business engagement. Also, there were mentoring and coaching sessions provided by the livelihood officer and consultant on financial recording and bookkeeping.
  • The PO learned that it is not only about the quality of output, rather, the quality starting from its source to production and marketing. Moreover, its impact on their environment and community.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • This approach will not only focus on profit but also on environmental protection, conservation and preservation.
  • Increase fish production because it will lessen the pressure of their usual fishing ground and minimize over fishing.
  • Alternative source of income to the fishers especially if there's gale warning and typhoons.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Turn over of Business Management Team especially the bookkeeper position because it is time demanding and keen on details. Choose a bookkeeper that is willing enough to follow through the records and no problem on his/her eye sight.
    Encourage and train second liner on the key positions.
    Provide honorarium to the business management team.
  • Security of tenure (land/sea) of their project site or production building. To enter a Memoramdum of Agreement (MOA) between the local government units.
    Lobbying in the local government unit to pass a resolution allowing the PO to use the land/sea as project site or production building.
  • Sustainability of the project even after DCW. The project holder will enter a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the local government unit as partners of the community in sustaining their project.
    Provided technical skills training to the PO so that they can mange their enterprise even after DCW project.
    Ensure registration and accreditation of the POs in the different committees of the local government unit and different government agencies.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • 2 years and 9 months is not enough to mold a strong and dynamic community-based social enterprise. Linkage to the Local Government Unit (LGU) and the different line agencies like Department of Trade and Industries (DTI), Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and Department of Science and Technology (DOST).
  • Upgrading of the People's Organization (PO) knowledge on production technology, marketing and product packaging. Linkage to the different line agencies like Department of Trade and Industries (DTI), Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and Department of Science and Technology (DOST) because they have the expertise to support the needs of the PO. For example, DTI for marketing and linkage and DOST for product development.
  • Capacity to access funds from the different line agencies and fund donors. Train the PO to conceptualize a project based from their needs, write project proposals and submit it to the concern agencies for funding.

References

Compiler
  • Keeshia Lynn Marie Austria
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Aug. 16, 2017
Last update: Feb. 26, 2018
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International