Apple orchard with drip irrigation (Stefan Michel)

Applying drip irrigation for efficient irrigation water use in varying contexts (Tajikistan)

Применение технологии капельного орошения для эффективного использования ирригационной воды

Description

Drip irrigation substantially saves water compared to conventional furrow irrigation. Here the technology is applied for different perennial and annual crops and with use of different sources of water.

In the arid areas of Sughd region cultivation of most crops is possible with irrigation only. In many cases conventional furrow irrigation is limited or impossible due to insufficient availability of irrigation water. Furthermore, conventional furrow irrigation is often connected with problems which make irrigated farming unsustainable – high water demand causes shortages for downstream water users and ecosystems, irrigation water can flush out nutrients from soil or cause erosion, high amounts of irrigation water and insufficient drainage can lead to waterlogging and where soil and/or irrigation water contain high amounts of salt to salinization. From an economic perspective, the high amounts of irrigation water required for conventional irrigation can be costly, especially where pumping from sources to fields at higher elevation is required. Climate change impacts like increasing aridity, changing seasonality of rainfall, reduced storage of precipitation as snow and glacier ice and resulting irrigation water shortages during critical seasons require adaptation in irrigated agriculture.

The broader application of drip irrigation is one way to address economic and environmental issues of irrigated farming, while specifically addressing climate change impact. The major effect of drip irrigation is the increased irrigation water use efficiency – “More crop per drop”. This avoids or reduces the above explained impacts of conventional furrow irrigation: water demand is massively reduced allowing irrigating fields and orchards in areas where water availability would not allow for conventional irrigated agriculture; loss of soil nutrients, irrigation induced erosion and waterlogging are avoided, salinization is much less likely and occurs only in small extent in cases where highly mineralized irrigation water is applied (not an issue in the described project region). The reduced need for irrigation water avoids conflict with downstream water users and the needs of ecosystems. Under climate change impact farmers applying drip irrigation have a higher security that sufficient irrigation water is available and the drip irrigation technology allows for an adapted provision of water to the crops in accordance to their physiological demand. Drip irrigation systems can be used to apply the accurate dosages of fertilizer directly to the plants. This increases the effectiveness of fertilizing and the efficiency in terms of costs as much less fertilizer is not taken by the crops.

Drip irrigation is applied for various crops:
•perennial crops: orchards of apple, apricot, pear and other fruit trees, vineyards, lemons in greenhouses;
•corn, onions, potatoes; and
•honey melon and water melon.

The high initial investment influences on the economic profitability of the technology. The project demonstrated that drip irrigation can be used not only for orchards, where it has an advantage over field crops, because there is no need re-install pipes every season. But it can be used for crops such as melons, onion, sunflower and corn. In the case of honey melon and water melon drip irrigation is particularly efficient due to the large area covered by every single plant. Thus the distances between pipes and between drippers can be large to supply each plant, but the plants with their long tendrils and large leaves effectively use the space in between. In trials of onion cultivation the generally high investment needs, required density of tubes and drippers and the comparably low market price made the technology in not economically competitive under current circumstances.

Drip irrigation can be applied with various sources of irrigation water. Compared to conventional furrow irrigation even low amounts of irrigation water or water from comparably costly sources can be effectively used. In the frame of the documented trials the following sources of irrigation water have been used for supplying drip irrigation systems in addition to water from irrigation canals:
•spring water collection with concrete reservoir;
•water from draw well, pumped to small water tower above the well and from their running by gravitation to concrete reservoir, from where it is supplying the drip irrigation system;
•rain water collection from house roofs with concrete reservoir;
•irrigation water withdrawn by large pumps from Syrdarya river and supplied via pipelines to newly irrigated areas;
•irrigation water from household water supply system, stored in concrete reservoir during day times of low demand.

The drip irrigation systems are equipped with manual (use of local irrigation water stored in concrete reservoirs or barrels) or automatic (direct use of irrigation water from pipelines) pressure regulation valves. At the outlets of reservoirs or at the pressure regulations device fertilizer can be added and provided to the plants in exact dosage.

Location

Location: Sughd region, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed: 10-100 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 69.86325, 40.39832
  • 69.19033, 40.02917
  • 69.03927, 39.9471
  • 69.00631, 40.01235
  • 69.36886, 40.12165
  • 69.62114, 40.31145

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: Nee

Date of implementation: 2017; less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Drip irrigation of apple tree (Stefan Michel)
Drip irrigation of lemons (Stefan Michel)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Nee

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, oilseed crops - sunflower, rapeseed, other, vegetables - melon, pumpkin, squash or gourd, vegetables - root vegetables (carrots, onions, beet, other)
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping: citrus, fruits, other, grapes
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? Nee
    Is crop rotation practiced? Ja

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion), Cs: salinization/ alkalinization
SLM group
  • water harvesting
  • irrigation management (incl. water supply, drainage)
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S7: Water harvesting/ supply/ irrigation equipment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: TJS
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 8.0 TJS
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
Water supply and storage systems, densities of drip irrigation pipes and drippers.
Establishment activities
  1. Construction of water supply and storage structures (Timing/ frequency: before irrigation season)
  2. Installation of drip irrigation system (Timing/ frequency: early in spring)
  3. Draining of water storages and drip irrigation system (Timing/ frequency: before cold season sets in)
Establishment inputs and costs (per ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (TJS) Total costs per input (TJS) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Construction of water withdrawal systems
Construction of rainwater harvest systems
Construction of water storage
Installation of drip irrigation systems ha 5.0 2800.0 14000.0
Construction material
Water withdrawal systems
Rainwater harvest systems
Water storage systems
Drip irrigation system orchard ha 5.0 7000.0 35000.0
Drip irrigation system onion field ha 1.0 20000.0 20000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 69'000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 8'625.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Refilling of water storage (Timing/ frequency: Depending on specific situation)
  2. Regulation of water supply in drip irrigation system (Timing/ frequency: Permanently during irrigation season)
  3. Control and cleaning of drippers as necessary (Timing/ frequency: At least weekly)

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 221.0
Rainfall varies between sites
Name of the meteorological station: Khujand
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • Kindergarten, gov't agency
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • Gov't organizations
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


Varying, depending on crop and specific situation.

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


Varying, depending on crop and specific situation.

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased


Areas of several hundred hectares additionally cultivated (ongoing)

irrigation water availability
decreased
increased


Absolute quantity of additionally available irrigation water is not high, but due to efficient use actually possible addtional irrigation is significant.

demand for irrigation water
increased
decreased


Actual consumption of irrigation water has not declined, but unsatisfied demand declined.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Expensive on-farm infrastructure required

workload
increased
decreased


Workload for installation and maintenance is higher than for conventional furrow irrigation.

Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased


Increase in area and productivity of irrigated lands without substantial increase of water withdrawal.

harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved


Use of water from previously not effectively used sources - rainwater from roofs, small springs, small wells.

landslides/ debris flows
increased
decreased


Use of drip irrigation for establishment of tree cover at debris flow site.

drought impacts
increased
decreased


Improved drought resistance by better availability, regulation and efficient use of irrigation water

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased


Avoided reduction of water availability due to use of water efficient irrigation technology in newly irrigated areas.

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
reduced


Use of drip irrigation for establishment of tree cover at debris flow site.

damage on public/ private infrastructure
increased
reduced


Use of drip irrigation for establishment of tree cover at debris flow site.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

High establishment costs.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: dry season
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
Beyond the trials supported by the project the technology is now applied as standard irrigation technology in the newly irrigated areas of Sayhun.
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Irrigation possible in areas with irrigation water supply insufficient for conventional irrigation technologies.
  • Low amount of irrigation water needed for effective irrigation.
  • Potential of expansion of irrigated land use in previously non-irrigable areas.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Same as land-user's view.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Expensive initial investment External financial support;
    Choice of most efficient options, use of cheap versions.
  • Costs of replacement of damaged parts of the system and access to replacement parts External financial support;
    provision of replacement parts
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Expensive initial investment Decrease of costs as market of equipment becomes larger;
    Provision of access to suitable financing schemes;
    Application of the technology for crops with high cross margin per area unit/per investment in irrigation.
  • Costs of replacement of damaged parts of the system and access to replacement parts Capacity development on proper maintenance, in particular draining before the cold season;
    Assistance in purchase of durable parts via extension services/procurement cooperatives.

References

Compiler
  • Stefan Michel
Editors
Reviewer
  • Umed Vahobov
Date of documentation: Jan. 8, 2019
Last update: Maart 12, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International