Oil barrel where the husks are pyrolised, and the chimney of the burning chamber. (Stefan Graf)

Production and use of rice husk biochar in rice seed beds and vegetable production. (Cambodia)

ការផលិត នឹងប្រើប្រាស់ជីធ្យូងអង្កាមលើថ្នាលសំណាបនឹងដំណំាបន្លែ (Khmer)

Description

Rice husks as well as empty seeds are pyrolised and used as a soil amendment in the rice seed beds and the vegetable gardens.

Biochar is the residue left after the pyrolysis of any organic matter and is used as a soil amendment. Pyrolysis occurs when the organic matter is heated in anaerobic conditions, which is usually done in specially designed kilns. Sometimes it is also made in a conventional fire, which is extinguished before the char turns to ash. Agricultural wastes like rice husks or unfilled grains are mainly used. Biochar can have many positive effects on the soil and plants:
-It buffers the pH, and has usually a high pH due to theash content.
-Due to its porous structure, it holds water and serves as refuge for microorganisms.
-It absorbs and adsorbs nutrients, both cations and anions. They are available for the plant roots.
-It can increase the resistance of plants to diseases.
Due to all these effects, the increased yields are higher than those that can be achieved only through the nutrients contained in the Biochar itself. Biochar is and was used in many parts of the world as soil amendment, with some benefits persisting for centuries. In Cambodia it was used during the Pol Pot regime to reduce the smell of the human faeces that were used on the fields due to a lack of other fertilizers. Today research in the Biochar domain is increasing, especially since the discovery of the man-made terra preta soils in South America.

Biochar is mainly used to increase the fertility, water holding capacity and carbon content of the soil. The fact that the benefits of Biochar addition to the soil remain for several years, unlike chemical fertilizers, makes it attractive to farmers. Other purposes, like the increased resistance of plants to diseases and buffering of nutrients are also of importance.

Biochar was introduced or reintroduced trough different NGOs, JICA (Japanese International Cooperation Agency) in this case study. Because of knowledge exchange between farmers, a rice husk char/ash mix, as residue from the pottery baking, was used already in 2011. In 2013 JICA borrowed a Biochar kiln to the local farmer self-help group with a training, so they could produce Biochar by themselves. The inner part of the kiln (cf. technical drawing) is filled with wood and lit. It is then put into an empty oil barrel, which is filled with rice husks. The heat pyrolyses the husks from the bottom to the top of the barrel, and the gases are burned in the inner part of the kiln and the chimney. Just before the upper part is pyrolysed, the husks are extinguished. There is a weight loss of about 50 to 60 % caused by this process. The Biochar is added to the fields after ploughing, and the fields are harrowed. In this case study, Biochar is used both in rice seed beds and in a vegetable patch. Concentrations of 0.5 kg/m2 are used in the rice seed bed, and 2.5 kg for the vegetables. Due to the little available quantities of husks, Biochar is not applied to the field yet. The use of Biochar is spreading quickly from farm to farm

The analysed area is flat (slope < 2%), with a tropical climate (dry season from November to May and wet season from June to October), and the soils are mostly sandy or loamy. The soil has a low fertility, contains little organic matter, and acidifies. The area has been deforested a long time ago, and the groundwater table is rather high (1-2 m during the dry season, on the surface during wet season).
Due to climate change, farmers notice more erratic rainfall, temperature rises and more recurrent droughts. Rice is the predominant crop grown in the area, since it serves as staple food (mix subsistence and commercial activities). Cattle are usually grazing on the fields after the harvest, without much control. Thus the cattle grazes too often and too much on the same spot, leading to degradation.
The increasing migration rate (the young generation leaves the villages to work in the cities, garment industry or abroad) results in a decrease of available labour force in the area which has detrimental effects on the agricultural activities. Furthermore, the civil war in the 1970s (Khmer Rouge) led to the loss of agricultural knowledge. Several NGOs are trying to re-establish the knowledge.

Location

Location: Kraing Leav, Kampong Chhnang, Cambodia

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 104.60503, 12.24919

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 0.1-1 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Oil barrel where the husks are pyrolised, and the chimney of the burning chamber. (Stefan Graf)
Burning chamber and part of the chimney. A wooden fire is started inside, and the burning chamber is then put into the oil barrel which is then filled with rice husks. (Stefan Graf)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: vegetables - other, vegetables - leafy vegetables (salads, cabbage, spinach, other), vegetables - root vegetables (carrots, onions, beet, other), vegetables - melon, pumpkin, squash or gourd, rice, cucumber
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion), Ca: acidification
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification
SLM group
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Biochar kiln. In the inner part, the combustion chamber, a wooden fire is lit. The burning chamber is then placed in the oil barrel, which is filled with rice husks. The heat pyrolyses the husks, the gas burn in the chamber and chimney. When pyrolysis is almost completed, the char is extinguished.
Kampong Chhnang
Date: 2014

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high
Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate (When farmers only buy Biochar the required technical knowledge is low.)
Main technical functions: increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…)
Secondary technical functions: improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), improvement of topsoil structure (compaction)

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: Rice husk Biochar (together with compost, which he already did before)
Quantity/ density: 0.5-2.5
Remarks: Entity: kg/m^2. Distributing on fields and harrowing.
Author: Stefan Graf, Switzerland

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Riels
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4000.0 Riels
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
The factors affecting the cost the most are the biochar kiln, and the amount of added Biochar.
Establishment activities
  1. biochar kiln (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Riels) Total costs per input (Riels) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
kiln 1.0 50.0 50.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 50.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 0.01
Maintenance activities
  1. Biochar making (Timing/ frequency: Whenever there is time)
  2. Adding Biochar to the fields after the compost was plowed in, and harrowing. (Timing/ frequency: Yearly, before planting.)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Riels) Total costs per input (Riels) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labour 1.0 20.0 20.0 100.0
Equipment
machine use 1.0 0.25 0.25 100.0
Plant material
rise husks 1.0 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 24.25
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 0.01

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
1486.45 mm 2013 in Kampong Chhnang
Thermal climate class: tropics. 27° to 35°C
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


According to the farmer, 50 to 70 % yield increase on his vegetable patches.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased


Rice husks become a demanded product instead of a waste. On the other hand, less pesticides are needed.

workload
increased
x
decreased


Biochar has to be made and added to the fields.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved


Increased production, healthier plants/less pests.

health situation
worsened
x
improved


Less pesticides needed.

contribution to human well-being
decreased
x
increased


Increased income, less expenses on pesticides.

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


Plants can stand a short dry spell better if grown with Biochar.

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased


A waste, rice husks, is returned to the soil. Biochar also adsorbs and absorbs nutrients.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


The carbon from Biochar has a long half-life period in the soil .

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased


Less pesticides needed.

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

The costs for the pyrolysis kiln were not borne by the land user. But as the farmer of this case study wants to build an own kiln as soon as the NGO needs it again, it is positive.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
drought

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Less insect damages where Biochar is applied.
  • Good growth of vegetables, with increased yields especially for onions.
  • The rice seedlings are stronger, and the roots break less while transplanting, and the plants recover quickly.
  • The plants survive a short dry spell better.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Soil amendment with long-term effect, as Biochar has a long half-life period.
  • Buffering and raising of the pH, especially in sandy soils.
  • Less washing out of nutrients.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Substrate to make Biochar (rice husks) is difficult to find in the area in big amounts, as only small rice mills are working there. Rice husks are wasted in other places. Networking with other villages.
    Use other (waste) sources of organic matter like leaves.
  • Increased workload for the Biochar production (compensated by the increased yields). Use a bigger kiln to decrease the workload.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The energy produced during the pyrolysis is wasted. Use it to power engines or as heating source. This would only be viable on large-scale kilns.

References

Compiler
  • Stefan Graf
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Deborah Niggli
Date of documentation: Okt. 27, 2014
Last update: Sept. 2, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Ithaka Journal: www.ithaka-institut.org
  • Biochar foundation: www.britishbiocharfoundation.org
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International