Photo showing Row Planting of anuual crops in Northern Uganda (Issa Aiga)

Row planting of annual crops (Uganda)

Pito kodi iline

Description

In row planting, crops are planted according to the recommended agronomic spacing to ease management and obtain maximum yields per unit area.

In this practice, the farmer planted sunflower (Helianthus) seeds at a spacing recommended for the particular variety. Sunflower variety PAN7033 and AGISUN was cultivated on 1 acre of land at a spacing of 15cm within row and 30cm between rows.
To plant crops in a row, the farmer has to ensure that the field is finely prepared. During planting, pegs are fitted at a spacing corresponding to spaces between the rows (30cm), along the width of the field. Ropes are then tied on the pegs along the length of the field. The rope guides the person who will be digging the planting holes, while another person would be dropping the seeds in the holes. After digging the holes in a row, the rope is transferred to the next set of pegs and the process is repeated. These activities require a minimum of 10 people to be working on the farm in order to plant 1 acre of sunflower in a day.
In this way; high yield is obtained from the crop. Activities like weeding, spraying, fertilizer application, harvesting becomes easy hence labor demand is reduced. Although there are elaborate gardening pegs and ropes in the market, the rope and pegs can be made from locally available materials hence reducing costs. Crop planted in rows may reduce surface runoff by planting in a homogenous way and improve maintain a consistent soil cover.

Location

Location: Amuru District, Northern Region,Uganda, Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 32.1347, 2.95231

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2015; less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Photo showing Row Planting of anual crops in Northern Uganda (Issa Aiga)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A7: Others
  • structural measures - S11: Others
  • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
None
Author: Kaheru
None
Author: Amale Balla Sunday
None
Author: Kaheru prossy

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 acre)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: UGX
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3600.0 UGX
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Labour for planting, weeding and harvesting takes the most of costs.
Establishment activities
  1. Land opening (Clearing the bush before planting) (Timing/ frequency: Once before establishment)
  2. 2 degrees tillage (Timing/ frequency: Once before establishment)
  3. Marking line (Timing/ frequency: During establishment)
  4. Digging (Timing/ frequency: During establishment)
  5. Seeding (Timing/ frequency: During establishment)
  6. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: After establishment)
  7. Harvesting (Timing/ frequency: After establishment)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 acre)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (UGX) Total costs per input (UGX) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour for planting Persons 10.0 5000.0 50000.0 100.0
Equipment
Hoes Pieces 3.0 10000.0 30000.0 100.0
pegs Pieces 6.0 2000.0 12000.0 100.0
ropes Rolls 1.0 10000.0 10000.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds Kgs 30.0 5000.0 150000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 252'000.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Monitoring (Timing/ frequency: Once a year)
  2. Harvesting (Timing/ frequency: once a year)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 acre)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (UGX) Total costs per input (UGX) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour for harvesting and monitoring. persons 5.0 5000.0 25000.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 25'000.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


High yield and pod filling.

land management
hindered
simplified


Row planting technique.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Especially on labour.

farm income
decreased
increased


From the sale of harvests (soya and sunflower).

Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased


Use of the soya bean residues.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased


Soil organic matter increased due to application of soya residues.

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: wet/ rainy season

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Easy to establish using a rope which is cheap.
  • Easy to establish and manage with minimum costs.
  • Good at controlling soil and water runoffs
  • The technology can easily be replicated and used by both small scale and large scale farmers.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Yield potential is high and realized when the spacing is done well by the land user according to recommended spacing.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Labour intensive at the time of establishment. Use group labour.
  • Time consuming during establishment. Use group labour to save on time.
  • Requires technical knowledge especially on the spacing. Provide information early enough to the land user on the required spacing.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The land user does not Incorporate Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) yet has livestock manure. Advice to integrate animal manure in row planting.

References

Compiler
  • Kamugisha Rick Nelson
Editors
  • JOY TUKAHIRWA
  • Richard Otto Kawawa
  • Sunday Balla Amale
  • Bernard Fungo
Reviewer
  • Donia Mühlematter
  • John Stephen Tenywa
  • Nicole Harari
  • Renate Fleiner
  • Stephanie Jaquet
Date of documentation: Junie 10, 2017
Last update: Maart 13, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International