Straw mulching (Hongzhu Fan)

Straw residues left on field after harvest and no tillage (China)

No tillage planting

Description

Method of this agricultual technology the rice straw will be left on the field after mechanized harvesting. Succession crop, such as rape, wheat or potato, were seeded directly under no tillage condition. Both measures aim at better soil regeneration and soil conditions for agriculture and subsequently increased yield and less soil degradation.

The SLM practice (straw mulching and no tillage) is applied in the Chengdu Plain Paddy Soil. The Chengdu plain has mild climate and abundant rainfall. It belongs to the warm humid subtropical Pacific monsoon climate zone.The main types of soil in the Chengdu plain are paddy soil and purple soil.The total land resources of the Chengdu plain are 1331800 hectares, and the per capita land resources are about 0.1044 hectares per person. In 2010, the total amount of cultivated land in the Chengdu plain was 478069 hectares, accounting for 35.90% of the area of the plain, accounting for 42.36% of the total area of agricultural land in the region, and the per capita arable land area was only about 0.0375 hectares. The Chengdu Plain is an important grain production base in Sichuan. Rice field-upland field rotation (rice - wheat, rice - rapeseed) is an important agricultural system.
On the case study area, the N, P and K fertilizers were applied as urea, calcium superphosphate and potassium chloride at the rates of 120-150 kg N ha-1, 75-120 kg P2O5 ha-1,and 75-120 kg K2O ha-1, during every crop. During crop season, the rate of 60% of N, 100% of P, and 50% of K fertilizers were applied as base fertilizer, while remaining 40% of N and 50% of K were used as top dressing fertilizer. The main measures of this SLM is rice straw or wheat straw mulching while havesting (leaving the straw after havest scattered on the field). Crops were harvested by a combine harvester (Kuotian combine harvester, model PR0488), then straw and stubble of crops were left at size of less than 20 cm in the field. The seeding of succession crop such as wheat and oil seed rape is done by a direct seeding machine. The land users are working eighter with a contractor or they use their own machines and labour force. The purposes of this technology were to increase production and improve soil fertility. Although plough layer can become shallow by long-term no tillage cultivation, more and more land users like this technology because it promises increased grain yield, reduction of fertilizers (and subsequently cost), and it improves soil physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Thus, it is expected that the measures of this SLM-Technology ends up in improved soil moisture, higher diversity of soil life and finally soil fertility .

Location

Location: Guanhan City, Wenjiang District, Chongzhou City, Basin plain, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 104.19102, 31.06222

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 100-1,000 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Mechnized harvest (Shanghong Chen)
Rape as succession crop has been seeded directly under no tillage condition. Straw mulch covers the soil. (Shanghong Chen)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: oilseed crops - sunflower, rapeseed, other, wheat, rice
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
    Is crop rotation practiced? Ja

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Pk: slaking and crusting
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • minimal soil disturbance
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The SLM practice (straw mulching while harvesting and no tillage) is applied in the Chengdu Plain paddy soil. The main measures of this SLM method is straw mulching while harvesting and no tillage. Crops are harvested by machine (actually in this case study by Kuotian combine harvester/model was PR0488), and then straw and stubble were left at size of less than 20 cm on the soil surface. The N, P and K fertilizers to the succession crop were applied in form of urea, calcium superphosphate and potassium chloride at the rates of 120-150 kg N ha-1, 75-120 kg P2O5 ha-1, and 75-120 kg K2O ha-1. Rates of 60% of N, 100% of P and 50% of K fertilizers were applied as base fertilizers, while the remaining 40% of N and 50% of K were used as top dressing fertilizers. After previous crop harvest of rice the succession crop as for example wheat, oil rape, maize will be seeded directly under no tillage condition.
Author: Hongzhu Fan

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 hectare)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Renminbi (RMB)
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 6.6 Renminbi (RMB)
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 120 RMB per day
Most important factors affecting the costs
Most of important factor affecting the costs of this technology is the type of machine used for harvest. (E.g. cost is high by the mini combine harvester because of the low efficiency).
Establishment activities
n.a.
Maintenance activities
  1. mechanized harvesting (Timing/ frequency: August or September)
  2. spreading the straw residues after havest on the field (Timing/ frequency: after harvest of crops)
  3. fertilization (Timing/ frequency: October)
  4. no tillage and direct seeding (Timing/ frequency: October)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 hectare)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Renminbi (RMB)) Total costs per input (Renminbi (RMB)) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
All reccurent labour (above) is done within the familiy* person-day 0.5 120.0 60.0 100.0
Equipment
harvester (machine from contractor without labour force)* ha 1.0 3000.0 3000.0 100.0
Direct seeding machine (from contractor without labour force)* ha 1.0 1800.0 1800.0
Plant material
seed (weat, rape) kg 120.0 2.0 240.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
urea kg 280.0 3.0 840.0 100.0
calcuim superphosphate kg 810.0 1.0 810.0 100.0
potassium chloride kg 200.0 3.5 700.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 7'450.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 1'128.79

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 14.9 t ha-1*
Quantity after SLM: 15.5 t ha-1*
* yield for rape
Wheat yield were 6.3 t ha-1 before SLM and 6.7 t ha-1 after SLM, respectively. Rice yield were 8.6 t ha-1 before SLM and 8.8 t ha-1 after SLM, respectively.

land management
hindered
simplified


No tillage is an important way to reduce cost by machine plough field. Less fertilizing work and amount of fertilizers by leaving straw on field (straw contains a large amount of C, N, P, and K)

demand for irrigation water
increased
decreased


Straw mulching can decreased demand for irrigation water, because water can be keep in the straw, and straw mulching on the soil also can reduced evaporation of water.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


No tillage is an important way to reduce cost by machine plough field. Less fertilizing work and amount of fertilizers by straw return compared with no straw mulching (straw contains a large number of C, N, P and K. Therefore agricultural inputs can be reduced.

farm income
decreased
increased


Do to better yield and reduction of costs.

workload
increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Increased knowledge on the benefits of straw mulching by the land users.

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased


Due to straw mulching, because the water can be kept in the straw and soil evaporation can be reduced to improved oil cover.

soil cover
reduced
improved


Due to the mulching by straw, the soil remain covered practically the whole year round.

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced


Without ploughing the soil crusting can occur at long term use of the technology (findings from a long-term straw mulch and fertilization experiment was initiated in 2005 at Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute’s Guanghan agricultural experiment station in Sichuan province)

soil compaction
increased
reduced


Without ploughing the soil gets more compact at long term use of the technology (findings from a long-term straw mulch and fertilization experiment was initiated in 2005 at Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute’s Guanghan agricultural experiment station in Sichuan province)

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased


Due to mulching by rice straw (crop residues)

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased


Due to mulching by rice straw (crop residues)

animal diversity
decreased
increased


Due to mulching by rice straw (crop residues), soil life has increased.

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
decreased


Traditional burning of rice straw on the fields has been reduced, as straw is needed for mulching. Subsequently the C can be bound within the soil and will not be emitted into the air in form of CO2.

Off-site impacts
impact of greenhouse gases
increased
reduced


Traditional burning of rice straw on the fields has been reduced, as straw is needed for mulching. Subsequently the C can be bound within the soil and will not be emitted into the air in form of CO2.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • This technology can improve the yield
  • It can save labour by leaving straw on the field
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Straw mulching can increase the soil carbon input, and improve the soil quantity.
  • This technology can reduce land degradation.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Soil structure was deteriorated by no tillage cultivation. tillage
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Soil hardening occured, and also a thin impervious layer was built at the soil surface It could be good to plough up the soil after an interval of 5 years
  • Obstruction of rainwater infiltration
  • Soil plough layer becomes shallow

References

Compiler
  • Song Guo
Editors
Reviewer
  • Gudrun Schwilch
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Okt. 31, 2017
Last update: Maart 13, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Composition of Wheat Rhizosphere Antagonistic Bacteria and Wheat Sharp Eyespot as Affected by Rice Straw Mulching. CHEN Huai-Gu, CAO Qi-Guang, XIONG Gui-Lin, LI Wei, ZHANG Ai-Xiang, YU Han-Shou and WANG Jin-Sheng.2010.: ScienceDirect. No
  • Effects of pre-sowing irrigation and straw mulching on the grain yieldand water use efficiency of summer maize in the North China Plain. Zhenxing Yan, Chao Gao, Yujie Ren, Rui Zong, Yuzhao Ma, Quanqi Li. 2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Effects of snow cover plus straw mulching on microorganisms in paddy soil during winter.Hao Zhanga,b, Jie Tanga, Shuang Liang.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Effects of Non-flooded Cultivation with Straw Mulching on Rice Agronomic Traits and Water Use Efficiency. QIN Jiang-tao , HU Feng , LI Hui-xin , WANG Yi-ping , HUANG Fa-quan , HUANG Hua-xiang.2006: ScienceDirect. No
  • Growth Characteristics and Yield of Late-Season Rice under No-tillageand Non-flooded Cultivation with Straw Mulching. WANG Dong, LI Hui-xin, QIN Jiang-tao, LI Da-ming, HU Feng.2010: ScienceDirect. No
  • Impact of tillage practices on soil bacterial diversity and composition under the tobacco-rice rotation in China. Yanping Lei, Yongliang Xiao, Lifeng Li,Chaoqiang Jiang, Chaolong Zu, Tian Li, and Hui Cao.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Nutrient Decomposition Rate and Sugarcane Yield as Influenced by Mung Bean Intercropping and Crop Residue Recycling Tie-Guang He,Li-Rong Su,Yang-Rui Li,Tian-Ming Su2 Fang Qin,Qin Li.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Process rates of nitrogen cycle in uppermost topsoil after harvesting in no-tilled and ploughed agricultural clay soil. Merjo Laine . Tobias Ru¨ tting . Laura Alakukku . Ansa Paloja¨rvi . Rauni Stro¨mmer.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Research on the effect of straw mulching on the soil moisture by field experiment in the piedmont plain of the Taihang Mountains. LI Man, ZHANG Wei, HE Yu-jiang, WANG Gui-ling.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Rice–wheat cropping system: tillage, mulch, and nitrogen effects on soil carbon sequestration and crop productivity Keshav R. Adhikari,Khem R. Dahal,Zueng-Sang Chen,Yih-Chi Tan,Jihn-Sung Lai.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • Soil Carbon Sequestration and Crop Yields in Rice–Wheat and Sugarcane–Ratoon–Wheat Cropping Systems Through Crop Residue Management and Inoculation of Trichoderma viride in Subtropical India.S. K. Shukla,Swaha Shee,S. K. Maity,S. Solomon,S. K. Awasthi,Asha Gaur,A. D. Pathak,V. P. Jaiswal.2017: ScienceDirect. No
  • 成都平原麦稻双免耕秸秆还田技术模式.汤永禄 , 黄钢, 郑家国, 李朝苏,邓先和,付书明.2008: http://www.cnki.net/. No
  • Influence of straw mulching with no-till on soil nutrients and carbon pool management index.CHEN Shang-hong, ZHU Zhong-lin, LIU Ding-hui, SHU Li , WANG Chang-quan.2008: http://www.cnki.net/. No
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International