A crop stand of legumes and maize that are rotated after seasons. (Paul Kahiga (8444-00300 Nairobi))

Crop Rotation (Kenya)

Crop rotation

Description

Crop rotation is the practice of growing a series of different types of crops in the same area in sequential seasons.

Growing the same crop in the same place for many years in a row disproportionately depletes the soil of certain nutrients. With rotation, a crop that leaches the soil of one kind of nutrient is followed during the next growing season by a dissimilar crop that returns that nutrient to the soil or draws a different ratio of nutrients. Crop rotation mitigates the buildup of pathogens and pests that often occurs when one species is continuously cropped, and can also improve soil structure and fertility by increasing biomass from varied root structures.

Purpose of the Technology: Crop rotation improves crop's productivity, it reduces soil erosion and enhances maximum nutrient utilization. Crop rotation also improve soil properties and aeration. A nitrogen-fixing crop, like a legume, should always proceed a nitrogen depleting one; similarly, a low residue crop (i.e. a crop with low biomass) should be offset with a high biomass cover crop, like a mixture of grasses and legumes

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Crop rotation is practiced by subdividing the land into different portions. The portions are planted with crops e.g. cereals at first then in the next season, another plant is planted in the following manner; 1) Cereals crop with legumes, 2) Deep rooted with shallow rooted and a cover crop.

Natural / human environment: In Embu county, the main crops that are rotated includes, maize and legumes.

Location

Location: Mbeere South District, Eastern Province, Kenya

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 37.78067, -0.58269

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 10-100 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
The photograph shown on the right hand side shows farmers inspecting different crops (Maize and dolichos lablab) which will be rotated in the next season) (Paul Kahiga (8444-00300, Nairobi))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, legumes and pulses - beans, vegetables - root vegetables (carrots, onions, beet, other), solanaceae
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is crop rotation practiced? Ja
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The technical drawing on the left hand side shows a typical crop rotation arrangement, a series of different types of crops in the same area are grown in sequential season. These may include, cereals, legumes, alliums and solanaceae.

Location: Embu. Eastern Province
Date: 13.02.2013

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high
Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…)
Author: Paul Kahiga, 8444-00300 Nairobi - Kenya

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Kshs
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 100.0 Kshs
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
labour
Establishment activities
  1. Land preparation (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Buy seeds (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Kshs) Total costs per input (Kshs) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Land preparation ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds ha 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 250.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 2.5
Maintenance activities
  1. Planting (Timing/ frequency: Each cropping season)
  2. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Kshs) Total costs per input (Kshs) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Planting and weeding ha 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 250.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 2.5

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: tropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

Improved livelihoods and human well-being
decreased
x
increased

Ecological impacts
biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts
buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
x
improved

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Helps in controlling weeds.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Crop rotation prevents soil depletion of nutrients thus maintains soil fertility.
  • Crop rotation reduces soil erosion
  • Reduces pest's build-up thus prevents disease infestation.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The fungi and pests left behind from a previous crop can potentially harm the new crop. Liase with agronomist for advice on appropriate pesticides and fungicides to use.
  • More time is required in preparing fields for crops ahead of rotations. Proper timing of farm operations in preparation of rotations

References

Compiler
  • Paul Kahiga
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Feb. 19, 2015
Last update: Sept. 4, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International