A landscape view of stoneline technology constructed along a contour line in Lower Mbeere South District, Kenya (Paul Kahiga (8444-00300 Nairobi))

Stonelines (Kenya)

Miraini ya maviga

Description

Stonelines are constructed along the contours to slow down the speed of runoff, filter the soil and enhance water infiltration.

In Kenya stone lines are mostly practiced in areas that receive 200-750 mm of annual rainfall with a spacing of 15-30 m between them. They are particularly common in areas where rocks are readily available, such as Mbeere, Laikipia, Baringo, Mwingi, Kitui and Tharaka. Since the stonelines are permeable they do not pond runoff water but instead, they slow down the speed, filter it and spread the water over the field, thus enhancing water infiltration and reducing soil erosion. They are built in series running along the slope. In addition, the stone barrier blocks and settles down the sediments transported from the upper slopes.

Purpose of the Technology: They are often used to rehabilitate eroded and abandoned land. The advantages of stonelines include; slowing down the runoff thereby increasing infiltration and soil moisture. They also induce a natural process of terracing, reducing erosion and rehabilitation of eroded lands by trapping silt. They are easy to design and construct and since the stone line structure is permeable there is no need for construction of spillways to drain the excess runoff water. When it rains, the soil builds up on the upslope side of the stonelines and over time a natural terrace is formed.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The stonelines are spaced 15-30 m apart, a shorter distance being used for the steeper slopes. Stonelines are normally suitable on gentle slopes. Slopes above 35% should be avoided. They are established in the following manner: first, the contour line are marked out with the help of a tube level or line levels. In this region here, it is done with the help of the frontline agricultural extension officers. Secondly, a shallow foundation trench is dug across the slope (5-10 cm to 30 cm deep) using basic farm equipments (jembes or hoes). As shown on the above photographs, the larger stones are put on the down slope side of the trench while the smaller stones are used to build the rest of the bund. The smallest stones are used to fill the gaps and increase the heights of the bunds up to the desired level. Farmers plant fruit trees (pawpaws) as show in the photograph above on the upper part. The trees utilises the moisture and rich sediments deposited on the upper part. The stonelines can be reinforced with earth, or crop residues to make them more stable. Maintenance of stonelines is done by repairing the already damaged /fallen stoneline that may have been knocked down or disarranged by livestock or by human beings. In this case animal access needs to be limited and/or the bund should be laid out in a way that allows the animals to pass through.

Natural / human environment: In the lower Mbeere South District where the stoneline technologies is largely practiced, unless there are stones in the individual farms, it might be difficult to import stones from other farms as the exercise can be labor intensive. In this catchment, the Ministry of Agriculture through the front line extension officers has taken a lead role in encouraging farmers to adopt the technology especially the farms which have many stones. Most of the farmers who have implemented this technology in the Lower Mbeere South District learn from the ones who are already practicing through field days or individual initiatives.

Location

Location: Mbeere South District, Eastern Province, Kenya

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 37.73636, -0.6751

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Farmers constructing a stoneline technology along a contour line in the Lower Mbeere South District (Paul Kahiga (8444-00300 Nairobi))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - millet, cereals - sorghum, legumes and pulses - peas
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping: mango, mangosteen, guava, pome fruits (apples, pears, quinces, etc.)
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
SLM group
  • water diversion and drainage
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S2: Bunds, banks

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
This is a technical drawing representing a cross-section view of how the stonelines are constructed by the emerging farmers in the lower Mbeere South District.

First, a small trench is dug along an established contour line, the farmer starts arranging the stones with reference to their sizes. The bigger ones are arranged on the lower side and the small ones on the upper side as shown on the technical drawing.

By so doing, the eroded soils are trapped on the upper side by the small pebbles, allowing the water to pass through at lower speed hence low erosive capacity.

Location: Ntharawe. Lower Mbeere South District

Date: 2011-08-02

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate (In order to implement this technology, the farmers contact the front line agricultural extension officer in order to assist in making the contours.)

Technical knowledge required for land users: high (Stone required placement of a certain order. Big stone on the lower side and small stones on the upper side-Vertically)

Main technical functions: water spreading, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting

Secondary technical functions: reduction of slope angle

Bund/ bank: graded
Spacing between structures (m): 15
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.8
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 1.2
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 27.6

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 8%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 8%
Author: W.Nguru, P.O.Box 12776-00100 Nairobi

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: Stonelines)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Kshs
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 80.0 Kshs
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 2.50
Most important factors affecting the costs
The system is labour intensive and hence will affect the cost of constructing the stonelines. However, availability of farm equipments like wheelbarrows, mattocks or oxen will help reduce the total cost and time required for construction and maintaining the stonelines. On steep slopes, the spacing between the lines is small as compared to a relatively gentle slope.
Establishment activities
  1. Establish a contour line and dig up a trench upon which the stones will be arranged (Timing/ frequency: yearly)
  2. stones are collected and arranged along the established trench. The big boulders are reduced to the required sizes by the use of mattocks (Timing/ frequency: once)
  3. The big stones are arranged on the lower side and the rest follows with respect to their sizes on the upper side (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. This formation is done per meter length. Mostly is charged 150Kshs per meter. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per Stonelines)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Kshs) Total costs per input (Kshs) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Establish a contour line Persons/day 0.5 3.76 1.88 100.0
Reduce stone size Persons/day 0.5 3.76 1.88 100.0
Arranging stones Persons/day 0.5 3.76 1.88 100.0
Equipment
Mattock pieces 1.0 18.75 18.75 100.0
Wheelbarrow pieces 1.0 20.0 20.0 100.0
Construction material
Stone no 1.0 1.88 1.88 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 46.27
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 0.58
Maintenance activities
  1. Repair/Rearrange stone on stone line after a rainy seasons or when people and animals have destroyed the stone line. (Timing/ frequency: yearly during dry season)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per Stonelines)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Kshs) Total costs per input (Kshs) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Repair/Rearrange stone mandays/acre 14.0 2.5 35.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 35.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 0.44

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Annual rainfall: Also < 250 mm
Thermal climate class: tropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

land management
hindered
simplified


Such that it hinders mechanisation tractors cannot operate due to the stone line arragement

workload
increased
decreased


The operation is labour intensive

Livelihood and human well-being
reduced
improved


Increased food security (the yield near the stoneline is better as compared to the situation that it was before implementation).

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
improved

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil loss
increased
decreased

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased


Snakes and scorpions

flood impacts
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
improved

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • By concentrating the stones along a contour, the farmer is able to make use of the land which otherwise is not possible if the stones are scatered.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Farmers should be encouraged to learn from one another but they should also seek advice from extension officers in making the contours.
  • The cost of replacement of farm equipments (jembes, forks and pangas) is reduced since they aren't broken by stones during land preparation.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • The stones for constructing the technology are readily available in most of the farms.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Encouraging farmers to use the available stones to put up the technology.
  • Stoneline technology prevents soil loss due to erosion.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Modification of the technology to allow more infiltration.
  • No high level technical knowledge is required for construction of stoneline technology.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? More farmers should be encouraged to adopt the technology since they dont need a high level of technical knowledge.
  • Stone lines technology can be modified to prevent soil and water from running off on the side of stone line ridge.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Construction of side ridges.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Contour profiling is challenging. Assistance from the front line agricultural extension officers.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Labour intensive. When constructing, always move the stones downslope by gravity instead of moving upwards i.e. start from the contours from the upper side
  • The technology only allows the soil to deposit on the upper side of the stoneline but water passes through. Proper arrangement of the stones should be enhanced basing on their sizes.
  • Increased habitats for snakes and other dangerous creatures like scorpions that hide on the stonelines. Where there creatures are prone, the farmers should be careful.

References

Compiler
  • Paul Kahiga
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Junie 13, 2013
Last update: Junie 7, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Thomas, D.B. (eds) 1997. Soil and Water Conservation Manual for Kenya. Soil and Water Conservation Branch. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Development and Marketing. 210 p.:
  • Critchley W and Seigert K (1991) Water Harvesting. FAO:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International