An eroded riverbank in Dang District (Udhaw Ghimire)

Riverbank Protection (Nepal)

Nadi Kinara Samrakchen (Main Contributor: Uddhaw Ghimire, DSCO)

Description

Local materials and knowledge can be used to construct low-cost structural measures that help to prevent the erosion of riverbanks and the loss of agricultural and residential land.

Riverbank cutting occurs naturally along the rivers that run along the foothills of the Chure (Siwalik) range in Nepal when the stream collides with the river bank or the bank is eroded by water coming from agricultural land above the affected area. When riverbank cutting occurs, it leaves behind an eroded area shaped like a small cliff. This erosion takes place naturally and is difficult to stop because the site is devoid of natural vegetation. It is important to undertake conservation measures because when the riverbank is eroded it damages agricultural land and decreases soil fertility. When the productivity of the land is decreased it affects the lives and livelihoods of nearby communities most of whom are subsistence farmers.

Purpose of the Technology: Communities have developed local measures to help protect the riverbanks and to prevent further erosion and cutting. This technology uses both structural and vegetative measures to help control the erosion and protect both agricultural land and settlement areas from flooding. Check dams are placed at intervals to divert water, additional support is provided by spurs. Bamboo rhizomes are planted between them and Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) is planted at the back of the structures so that as the plants grow their roots help to anchor the structure. The washed out areas can be used to generate some income by planting them with greenery and fruit trees. The site needs to be monitored annually and where necessary the structures either need to be repaired or supplemented by building additional structures.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: This technology is a blend of local skills and expertise with some external technical input. The key features of the technology are as follow:
• It uses locally available construction materials, tools, equipment, and vegetation.
• It is easy to replicate.
• It is affordable for local people.
• It is environmentally friendly.
A demonstration plot was established by the District Soil Conservation Office (DSCO) in Dang, but the technology needs to be replicated in other areas with action research and experience

Location

Location: Gobardiha-9, Madhabpur, Dang District,, Nepal

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • n.a.

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation:

Type of introduction
An eroded riverbank in Dang District (Udhaw Ghimire)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
  • Forest/ woodlandsProducts and services: Fuelwood, Grazing/ browsing
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wr: riverbank erosion
SLM group
  • surface water management (spring, river, lakes, sea)
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S5: Dams, pans, ponds

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
A low cost riverbank protection scheme that can be implemented using mostly local materials.

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, control of concentrated runoff: impede / retard

Secondary technical functions: improvement of ground cover, stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides)
Author: Bhojdeo Mandal, AK Thaku

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
The costs for the gabion boxes, the transportation costs, and some skilled labour, were borne by the DSCO, Dang; whereas, the costs for the tools, local materials, and all of the unskilled labour were borne by the local community. All costs and amounts are rough estimates by the technicians and authors.
Establishment activities
  1. Structural: Check dam construction (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Spur construction (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Vegetative: Pitting (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Bamboo planting (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. Napier grass planting (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Construction of rivervbank protection ha 1.0 892.0 892.0 51.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 21.0 21.0 51.0
Plant material
Napier grass, bamboo seedlings ha 1.0 14.0 14.0
Construction material
Stone ha 1.0 1281.0 1281.0 51.0
Bamboo poles ha 1.0 274.0 274.0 51.0
Wire for gabion box ha 1.0 1644.0 1644.0 51.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 4'126.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 4'126.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Structural: Verify the integrity of the spurs and check dams; fortify or repair as needed. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Vegetative: Maintenance costs cover only replacement and maintenance to be done by the local community for a few years until the vegetative structures are well established at the site. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. VegetativeCheck to see that the Napier grass seedlings have taken root; add additional plants as needed. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Fortify and reapir check dams ha 1.0 52.0 52.0 100.0
Plant material
Napier grass, bamboo seedlings ha 1.0 7.0 7.0 100.0
Construction material
Bamboo poles for replacing ha 1.0 123.0 123.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 182.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 182.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: tropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

community institutions
weakened
x
strengthened

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
x
improved

livelihood and human well-being
reduced
x
improved


Agricultural land is conserved and production is increased

Ecological impacts
soil loss
increased
x
decreased

flood impacts
increased
x
decreased

drought impacts
increased
x
decreased

impacts of cyclones, rain storms
increased
x
decreased

Off-site impacts
downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
x
reduced

risk of flodd for public and private infrastructure, even at some distance from the site
improved
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
general (river) flood

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
47 households in an area of 10 ha
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • The technology is low cost and can be implemented by the local community with the assistance of some technical support from the DSCO, Dang.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? The DSCO, Dang, needs to continue to support the community in its efforts by technical backstopping, regular follow-up, and continued scaling up of the technology.
  • The technology predominantly uses locally available materials.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Replication of this technology should be encouraged by the community as well as by the DSCO, Dang
  • In the long run, vegetative structures help to propagate greenery and in so doing, they promote climate change adaptation and mitigation.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Communities should be made aware of the hazards of climate change and of what mitigation measures can be employed.
  • Traditional measures used to help protect against flooding were very labour intensive and difficult to implement. This new method is low cost, easy to adopt, and sustainable.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Additional training with local communities can help to spread the expertise
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Vegetative structures may not always take root as intended; the initial cost for the gabion cages can be high. Try to implement the technology using vegetative measures
  • Despite the fact that the technology is known to be effective, it is not being widely implemented. Communities need greater awareness; intensive extension is needed in order for the technology to have widespread acceptance.

References

Compiler
  • Shreedip Sigdel
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Aug. 13, 2015
Last update: Junie 4, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • District Forest Office, Dang; Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Measures and Low Cost Techniques; Environment Statistics of Nepal, Annual Report (2065/66): Available at DSCO, Dang and DCSWM, Kathmandu
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International