Picture 1 is the picture of improved stove.

Khuwa making by the use of Improved stove (Nepal)

Khuwa utpadan ma sudhariyeko chulo (in nepali)

Description

The technology used is improved stove. An improved stove is a device that is designed to consume less fuel and save cooking time,convenient in cooking process and creates smokeless environment or reduction in volume of smoke against the traditional stove.

Technology used is improved stove. Improved stove is more efficient to use than traditional stove. Efficient in the sense that it consumes less fire wood (half than that consumed by traditional stove). It consists of one input hole to feed the wood and the heat is transferred throughout the stove which saves the firewood consumption. There is a hole for the passage of smoke.

Purpose of the Technology: The main purposes of this technology are:
•Increased thermal efficiency
•Conservation of forests by cutback in firewood conservation
•Reduction in indoor air pollution and hence smoke released health disorders
•Prevention of fire hazards
•Reduction of cooking time

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The factory for khuwa production was established in 2050 BS. It is continued from their ancestors. In ancient time, for the production large amount of firewood was needed and from this large amount of smoke was released which gave rise to health problems and environmental pollution.

Now, the technology has changed but the process is still the same. Improved stove is used instead of traditional stove. For the improved stove materials required are soil, iron rod & tin. Other tools and utensils are dabilo,khurpi, karai & bowl. Monthly maintenance is required.

Natural / human environment: This technology is environment friendly. This technology has direct effect on the agro forestry sector, rural economy and health.

Location

Location: Kavrepalanchowk,Chyamrangbesi VDC, Nepal, Nepal

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 85.55, 27.616

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • Increases efficiency
Land use

  • Settlements, infrastructure - Settlements, buildings
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • biological degradation - Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
SLM group
  • energy efficiency technologies
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S11: Others
  • management measures - M7: Others

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Fig(1) shows the orthographic and isometric view of improved stove.

Location: Chyamrangbesi. Kavre

Date: 15th Jan 2012

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high (labour is needed for utilizing the technology)

Technical knowledge required for land users: high

Main technical functions: increase in organic matter

Secondary technical functions: increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…)

Structural measure: hole for smoke passage

Structural measure: 1 m iron rod to support stove

Construction material (earth): The improved soil is made up of soil or mud.

Construction material (other): Iron rod is used to support the stove and tin is used to build chimneys.

Layout change according to natural and human environment

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: improved stove)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = -1.0
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
Milk fat determines the cost of the milk.Transportation fee, labor cost & distribution of khuwa(milk products) affect the cost.
Establishment activities
  1. Labour (Timing/ frequency: Monthly)
  2. Construction of improved stove (Timing/ frequency: once)
  3. Instrument/cost of the tools (Timing/ frequency: once)
  4. construction of hole for passage of smoke (Timing/ frequency: once)
Establishment inputs and costs (per improved stove)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour unit 1.0 68.98 68.98 100.0
Equipment
Stove and tools unit 1.0 284.09 284.09 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 353.07
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD -353.07
Maintenance activities
  1. Stove (Timing/ frequency: monthly)
  2. Labour for repairing stove (Timing/ frequency: monthly)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per improved stove)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Reparing stove unit 1.0 3.44 3.44 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 3.44
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD -3.44

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
wood production
decreased
x
increased

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

land management
hindered
x
simplified

drinking water availability
decreased
x
increased

drinking water quality
decreased
x
increased

water availability for livestock
decreased
x
increased

water quality for livestock
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water availability
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water quality
decreased
x
increased

demand for irrigation water
increased
x
decreased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
livelihoods and human well-being
reduced
x
improved


By improved stove the consumption of wood and production of smoke has been decreased to a great extent which decreases the chance of getting negative impact from the smoke in human health and environment.

Ecological impacts
Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
local windstorm

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal changes

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • less consumption of wood

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? they can be enhanced by using modern machine which operates by electricity. By this there would be no pollution.
  • pollution reduction
  • ashes after burning firewood can be used as organic matter for soil
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • low cost, local availability and easy to manufacture
  • reduced concentrations of smoke and indoor air pollution
  • saves time and money in acquiring fuel
  • less pressure on forest and energy resources
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • monthly repairing is required Implement new technology i.e. use machine that runs by electricty

References

Compiler
  • Sabita Aryal
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Jan. 16, 2014
Last update: Junie 5, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International