Seeding of rye-grass between established corn rows. (Henk Leever (Oude Eibergseweg 13, 7273 PJ, Haarlo, Netherlands))

Intercropping of grass and corn to increase soil organic matter (Netherlands)

Gras onderzaai bij mais (NL)

Description

Grass intercropping on corn fields

Italian rye grass is sown when the corn has grown to knee height, and has not yet developed a closed cover. The grass is plowed into the soil several months after the harvest of the corn crop.

Purpose of the Technology: The purpose of the technology is to enable a good growth of the catch crop (the grass) and to increase root biomass production after the corn is harvested. This will contribute to the organic mater content of the soil, and reduce the leaching of nitrogen and potassium. After underplowing of the grass, the nitrogen and potassium will be released to the soil and become available for the next crop.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: When corn is well established (between 30-60 cm height), grass is seeded between rows. A special seeder is required. Tractor must have tires that fit between corn rows. Grass germinates, but growth is reduced as corn matures and creates shade. When corn is harvested, grass continues to grow as a winter catch-crop. Some years, grass is sprayed with fertiliser to increase mineralisation. Grass is cultivated into the soil in early spring.

Natural / human environment: Multi-functional rural area with land use for agriculture, recreation, residence and nature. Dairy agriculture in small farms for Dutch standards combined with arable cropping. High livestock density.
Undulating landscape with cover sands and clayey and loamy sediments. Podzols and cambisols developed in sandy substrate. The area also has patches of anthroposols, soils enriched in Medieval times with manure and organic residues. Phosphate and nitrogen levels in these soils are in general high.
Mean monthly temperature varies between 2 and 17°C. The long-term mean annual precipitation is between 800 and 825 mm, with the lowest amounts in spring, and the highest in autumn. The long-term average annual precipitation deficit is between 200 and 240 mm.

Location

Location: Haarlo - Oude Eibergen, Gelderland, Netherlands

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 6.60339, 52.10199

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (0.94 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Germinated rye grass growing between corn rows. (Henk Leever (Oude Eibergseweg 13, 7273 PJ, Haarlo, Netherlands))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - other, fodder crops - grasses, root/tuber crops - potatoes
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? Ja

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction
  • water degradation - Hq: decline of groundwater quality
SLM group
  • Intercropping
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
After the corn crop is growing, a tractor with a seeder sows Italian Rye-grass seeds between the rows of corn. The grass seeds are sown in strips parallel to the corn rows. The corn rows are 0.75 metres apart. The grass strips are usually between 0.50 and 0.60 metres wide, but this is according to the farmer's preference. this means that a spacing of between 0.075 and 0.125 metres remains bare on each side of the grass strip, between the grass and the corn.

Location: Haarlo - Oude Eibergen. Gelderland

Date: April 8 2015

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Technical knowledge required for agricultural contractor: high (technical skills are required from an agricultural contractor with a special machine to sow the grass in the already standing maize crop.)

Main technical functions: increase in organic matter, increase of biomass (quantity)

Secondary technical functions: improvement of ground cover, improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase / maintain water stored in soil, improvement of water quality, buffering / filtering water

Cover cropping
Material/ species: Italian rye-grass
Quantity/ density: 25 kg/ha
Remarks: Between corn rows width 0.075-0.125 m bare space.

Green manure
Material/ species: Italian rye-grass
Quantity/ density: 25 kg/ha
Remarks: Between corn rows width 0.075-0.125 m bare space.

Rotations / fallows
Remarks: The Italian rye grass is worked into the soil ca 5 months after the harvest of the maize.

Aligned: -linear
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): not applicable
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.75-1.25

Grass species: Italian rye grass

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): not applic%
Author: Jason Stuka, Niemeijerstraat 26-II, 6701 CT, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Euro
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.94 Euro
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 255.70
Most important factors affecting the costs
New equipment (Seeder) - The seeding and fertilizer applications are hired from a company. The company purchases the new equipment to seed between the corn rows. The greatest determinate factor to the land users are then the cost of hired machine hours.
Establishment activities
  1. Buy a seeder (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Euro) Total costs per input (Euro) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
Seeder Machine 1.0 5327.05 5327.05
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 5'327.05
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 5'667.07
Maintenance activities
  1. Seeding (Timing/ frequency: After corn is established)
  2. Fertilizer (Timing/ frequency: Every other year)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Euro) Total costs per input (Euro) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
Machine use ha 1.0 117.2 117.2 100.0
Plant material
Seeds ha 1.0 42.62 42.62 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer Hired(machine+fert) ha 1.0 9.06 9.06 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 168.88
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 179.66

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
182 days of precipitation annually
Thermal climate class: temperate. Mean monthly temperatures vary between 2-17 °C (LGP 240-269 days, mean monthly temperatures vary between 2-17 °C)
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


Expected increase of maize production: to 6-7 tonnes/ha. Not proven yet.
Possible competition between crop and grass. Not shown yet.

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


Expected. Not proven yet.

demand for irrigation water
increased
decreased


Only for farmers with fields at higher elevations and drier soils.

workload
increased
decreased


Saves seeding winter crop in autumn.
Added planning, but work is hired.
Undersowing of grass in the standing maize crops requires specific skills.

Socio-cultural impacts
community institutions
weakened
strengthened


Created farmer's foundation.

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Farmers understanding ecological impacts of farming practices and organic matter in soils.

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved


Farmers collaborating with water company.

Improved livelihoods and human well-being
decreased
increased


Dairy farmers have learned more about the importance of soil organic matter for their production systems, and about the consequences of soil management on soil organic matter and other aspects of soil health. This learning was brought by the exchange of knowledge between farmers and experts, and between farmers themselves. Farmers also profited from services provided to them by the farmers' foundations: shared investments (e.g. in the manure separator) and support in the application for subsidies to finance the SLM measure.

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased


Insignificantly more water transpiration.

water quality
decreased
increased


Expected. Not proven yet.

surface runoff
increased
decreased


Expected. Not proven yet. Little to no slope.

excess water drainage
reduced
improved


Expected. Not proven yet.

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
recharge


Insignificantly more water transpiration.

soil moisture
decreased
increased


Expected. Not proven yet. Claimed by some farmers already.

soil cover
reduced
improved


Not measured but observed on photographs.

soil compaction
increased
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased


Expected. Not proven yet.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased


Expected. Not proven yet.

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased


Not measured but observed on photographs.

plant diversity
decreased
increased

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
increased


Expected. Not proven yet.

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased


Possibly. Not proven.

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
decreased


Expected. Not proven yet.

Off-site impacts
downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced


Expected. Not proven yet.

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced


Expected. Not proven yet.

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
improved


Expected. Not proven yet.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Farmers are subsidized for seeding rye-grass between corn rows. If not subsidized, they are unlikely to invest. Few farmers have seen short-term benefits. Their willingness to invest is based on their understanding of the long-term benefits, brought about by the Approach developed in the Project Gezond Zand (and in RECARE).

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
20
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • increases soil organic matter

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? annual application of the measure; subsidy to execute the measure
  • increases maize crop yield in the long term

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? annual application of the measure
  • reduces leaching of nitrogen, potassium and pesticides to the groundwater
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • increases soil organic matter

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? annual application of the measure; subsidy to execute the measure
  • increases available soil moisture
  • reduces leaching of nitrogen, potassium and pesticides to the groundwater
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Uncertainty of the success or positive effect of the measure.
  • Uncertainty of negative effects to the crop.
  • Uncertainty of competition between grass and crop for nutrients and moisture.
  • Concerns about cost and labour
  • Uncertainty of hindrance from legislation.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • technology requires hiring of skilled labour and machinery, which is not viable without subsidy in the short term provide subsidy in the first 3-5 years of implementation

References

Compiler
  • Jason Stuka
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Maart 24, 2015
Last update: Junie 5, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • RECARE_WP3 Report: CS_11_Ouden-Eibergen_v2Annemieke Smit and Simone Verzandvoort2014: Freeannemieke.smit@wur.nl
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International