Preparation 500 application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management. (Alicia Morugán Coronado)

Preparation 500 application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management. (Spain)

Cow horn manure applied in biodynamic agricultural management.

Description

This technology is focused in the application of the preparation number 500 based on cow dung filled in cow horns, and buried in the soil pit during the cooler month to improve soil structure, soil nutrition and humus formation

1. Preparation 500 application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management is applied in a flat peaches orchard of 40 ha located in Jumilla in southeastern Spain. It is sited in the north east of the Region of Murcia, on the Altiplano area, close to the towns of Cieza and Yecla. This area has an important agricultural activity being the mainly crops the vineyards, Jumilla is a Spanish Denominación de Origen (DO) for wines that extends over
the north of the region of Murcia.
2. This technology is based on the application of the preparation number 500, commonly known as cow horn manure. Preparation 500 is made by filling a cow's horn with cow dung every year, and burying it in the soil during the cooler months (November through February). The horns should be buried open end down so that they will not become water logged if the pit is over watered. When the preparation is ready after 4 months should have turned into dark humus. It should be stored in a cool place and in glazed pots isolated. It is sprayed up to four times a year. The best times are in October and November and then again in February and March. It is stirred for one hour making a vortex. The Horn Manure preparation 500 should be diluted in good-quality rainwater that has been properly stored. The preparation is then stirred vigorously for exactly one hour before spraying. The water should be heated before stirring, ideally to body temperature. Spraying in the field area should be done in the evening, not before 5 pm (4 pm in winter) on a day that is not too windy or too hot, avoiding direct sunlight. A slightly overcast, late afternoon is ideal. Avoid spraying in the rain, or if heavy rains are forecast after spraying. Don't spray if night frost is expected, in order to ensure the correct working of preparation 500.
Preparation 500 is basically fermented cow dung. It is the basis for soil fertility, and the renewal of degraded soils.
3. The main purpose of this technology is focused in to treat the farm as a living system, based on preparations
which mean objective is prepare to soil as self-sustaining agro-ecosystem.
4. This flat tree orchard was under organic farming management before the current technology was applied, the major activity was elaborated the preparation 500 and sprayed out in the orchard. Secondary activities were focused in maintain the preparation during the rest of the year and improve the soil keeping vegetation cover and reducing the tillage.
5. There are several benefits observed after this technology was applied, regarding the soil quality a Strong humus layer was formed and organic matter increased, in general the soil structure improved. Another positive impact was the response against plagues, the establishment of self-sustaining agro-ecosystem increase the biodiversity and the
beneficial species in the orchard.
6. Land user is satisfied with the results of this technology in his orchard because a new market sector opens thanks to changing the orchard to biodynamic farming, the crop quality and the soil properties improved, soil organic matter, soil structure and response against plagues were enhanced. On the other hand, land user dislikes the great amount of money to change the agricultural management to biodynamic farming, the preparations and the external organization certifications are expensive.

Location

Location: Jumilla, Murcia, Spain

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -1.3866, 38.39914

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 0.1-1 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2014

Type of introduction
Biodynamic agriculture in the southern Spain (Alicia Morugán Coronado)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Ja - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping: grapes, duraznos planos (Prunus persica var. platycarpa), frutas mediterráneas
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pk: slaking and crusting, Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
  • biological degradation - Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
None
Author: Alicia Morugán Coronado

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 40)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: euro
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.944508 euro
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 60
Most important factors affecting the costs
Weather conditions could affect the orchard production if heavy rainfall occur or intensive drought affect to vegetative stress.
Establishment activities
  1. Preparation process (Timing/ frequency: all year)
  2. Spread out preparation 500 (Timing/ frequency: november, december, january, may)
  3. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 40)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (euro) Total costs per input (euro) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
weed cutting persona/dia 2.0 60.0 120.0 100.0
Filling horns, burying and recovery persona/dia 15.0 60.0 900.0 100.0
Mixing hummus with water and spread out preparation 500 persona/dia 5.0 60.0 300.0 100.0
Equipment
electricity item 2.0 18.0 36.0 100.0
Cow horns to be filled with cow dung item 100.0 10.0 1000.0 100.0
glazed storing pots for Preparation 500 item 3.0 50.0 150.0 100.0
tractor with trailer (hire per day) pieza 1.0 30.0 30.0 100.0
cow dung item 5.0 60.0 300.0 100.0
Plant material
shovel item 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
tank irem 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
1.0 3000.0 3000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
cow manure needed to produce Preparation 500 kg 10.0 10.0 100.0 100.0
organic amendment
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 5'961.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 6'311.22
Maintenance activities
  1. weed cutting (Timing/ frequency: October)
  2. Biodynamics Preparations (Timing/ frequency: November-December)
  3. Biodynamics preparations application (Timing/ frequency: November to May)
  4. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 40)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (euro) Total costs per input (euro) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Biodynamics preparations application persona/dia 15.0 60.0 900.0 100.0
5.0 60.0 300.0 100.0
2.0 60.0 120.0 100.0
Equipment
tractor with trailer (hire per day) item 8.0 30.0 240.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
preparations item 10.0 10.0 100.0 100.0
manure item
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 1'660.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 1'757.53

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 369.0
Lluvias torrenciales concentradas en Septiembre y Octubre
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
crop quality
decreased
x
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved


Biodynamic farming reduce soil degradation

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


the soil keept the moisture because the organic amendment applied in preparation 500

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

acidity
increased
x
reduced

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

invasive alien species
increased
x
reduced

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
x
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
x
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts
groundwater/ river pollution
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal rainfall increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: autumn
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
heatwave

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
x
very well
epidemic diseases

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Strong humus formation
  • Improvement against plagues
  • Absorption and retention of water is greater
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Increase of organic matter
  • Enhancement of soil structure
  • Increase biodiversity of soil
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Short response time to the weather risks
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The high dependency on climatological conditions

References

Compiler
  • Alicia Morugán-Coronado
Editors
Reviewer
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Gudrun Schwilch
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Mei 29, 2017
Last update: Julie 23, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • no:
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International