Lemon trees orchard in sustainable farming in southern Spain (Alicia Morugán Coronado)

Organic amendment located in dripper point in organic citrus production (Spain)

Aplicación de estiércol de oveja en puntos de riego por goteo en la producción de cítricos orgánicos

Description

The land user applies organic amendment located in a dripper point. Sheep manure is applied every year in holes under the foot of every lemon tree. The holes are dug with a shovel.

Natural / human environment: This SLM technology was established in land under sustainable agricultural in the region of the Vega Baja del Segura (Spain). The region under study is the most southerly county within the Valencian Community (Comunidad Valenciana). Our study site focuses on the province of Alicante. The county is Vega Baja del Segura, which has a total area of 957.73 km2. The county of Vega Baja de Segura covers the region from Orihuela to the mouth of the Segura, where it meets the Mediterranean Sea in Guardamar del Segura (Alicante). Agricultural production in this county is of a very high quality and is intensely competitive. Despite this, the region’s traditional agriculture industry is nonetheless being overtaken by other sectors, with the scarcity of water emerging as a key factor in this shift. Currently, 67% of the arable area relies on irrigation systems. In this area, small holdings yield the majority of the agricultural production: 76% of agricultural estates cover less than five hectares. The main cultivation, in terms of area, is in trees (22,900 ha). Citrus trees (lemon, orange, and mandarin) are the main trees grown in the area (INE, 2009).

Purpose of the Technology: Initially, the main objective of the land user applying the technology was to improve the soils and crop production in his fields by promoting sustainable agricultural management in the Vega Baja region. The previous use of land was conventional with inorganic fertilization and intensive ploughing. The land user had to convert the conventional lemon tree orchard to organic farming with more sustainable practices. The initial investment was very high and he needed nearly 7 years to get certified in Eco-certification and labelling by the Comité de Agricultura Ecológica de la Comunidad Valenciana.

The land user makes all kind of innovative practices to improve soil fertility and crop production; the most pioneering initiative was to apply organic amendment located in dripper points. Organic certified sheep manure is applied every year in September in holes under the foot of every lemon tree. The following year, the position of the hole is moved around the tree. The holes are dug with a shovel; each hole is 0.4 m wide and 0.2 m deep. The eco-certificate sheep manure is bought from sheep holders. The sheep manure is composed of NPK (2.9; 1.8; 2.4%) with a C/N ratio of 8.8. The organic matter content is 44.5% and the moisture value is 53.8%. The irrigation is by drippers and it includes fertilizers in it. The land user is controlling the fertirrigation dose, changing the amount depending on the nutritional state of the orchard and climatological conditions. As part of the organic agriculture, the weed is not removed anymore. Pest control is done by biological methods: fly adhesive traps, pheromones moths traps, Bacillus thuringiensis solution sprayed, paraffin oil and copper sulphate applied by drip irrigation. The pruning remains are kept on the soil surface as a mulching.

The major benefit is an enhancement of the soil organic content in the long term. There is also an improvement of the orchard productivity. The lemon trees become less prone to diseases and pests. The major disadvantage is the high costs at the beginning to change from conventional to organic and to get the Eco-certificate.

Location

Location: Orihuela, Vega Baja/Alicante, Spain

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -0.87871, 38.04578

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2014

Type of introduction
Sheep manure applied in holes near to the lemon trees (Alicia Morugán Coronado)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Tree and shrub cropping: citrus
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Pk: slaking and crusting
  • biological degradation - Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bl: loss of soil life
SLM group
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Species used: Lemon tree (Citrus verna)
Lemon tree root depth: 0.5-0.6m
Spacing between plants: 5m
Spacing between manure holes: 1m
Vertical intervals between drip irrigation rows: 2m
Width holes: 0.2m
Lengths holes: 0.4m
Depths holes: 0.2m
Author: Alicia Morugán Coronado

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 7.7 ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Euro
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.944508 Euro
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 60
Most important factors affecting the costs
The pests, and the loss of product caused by unexpected weather.
Establishment activities
  1. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 7.7 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Euro) Total costs per input (Euro) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Equipment
Fertilizers and biocides
Maintenance activities
  1. Digging hole (Timing/ frequency: September)
  2. Organic amendment (Timing/ frequency: September)
  3. Irrigation (Timing/ frequency: all year)
  4. Biological control (Timing/ frequency: all year)
  5. Fertirrigation (Timing/ frequency: All year, except autumn and winter)
  6. Pruning material left on soil surface (Timing/ frequency: May, July and August)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 7.7 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Euro) Total costs per input (Euro) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Organic amendment person/hour 5.0 6.0 30.0 100.0
Pruning person/hour 100.0 6.0 600.0 100.0
Fertirrigation person/hour 100.0 6.0 600.0 100.0
Biological control person/hour 30.0 10.0 300.0 100.0
Equipment
Tractor with trailer (hire per day) piece 2.0 30.0 60.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Organic amendment kg 1200.0 30.0 36000.0 100.0
Fertirrigation Litres 1400.0 8.0 11200.0 100.0
Bacillus thuringiensis Kg 60.0 20.0 1200.0 100.0
Copper sulphate solution Kg 5.0 30.0 150.0 100.0
Paraffin oil Litres 10.0 30.0 300.0 100.0
Adhesive trap piece 100.0 10.0 1000.0 100.0
Pheromone trap piece 10.0 40.0 400.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 51'840.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 54'885.72

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 250.0
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


The land user observe that the crop production increased two times with the organic agriculture management.

crop quality
decreased
x
increased


The lemon fruit with the organic farming management is bigger than before with conventional management.

irrigation water availability
decreased
x
increased


Changing the irrigation to drip irrigation the land user can save water.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased


Less use of fertilizer, less tillage, no herbicides/pesticides.

farm income
decreased
x
increased


The price of eco-certified lemon in the market is 3 times higher than conventional and the expenses on agricultural inputs are lower.

workload
increased
x
decreased


Only work for digging the hole, maintaining fertirrigation, harvesting and pruning, but no work for applying pesticides, tillage and weeding.

Socio-cultural impacts
health situation
worsened
x
improved


Improved health due to non-application of herbicides/pesticides.

land use/ water rights
worsened
x
improved


The farmer can buy more land due to this income.

community institutions
weakened
x
strengthened


Due to this eco-management, the farmer became well-known and recognized in the region. He appears in television and teaches other farmers and became the president of the regional farmer association.

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved


The farmer learned a lot about the soil and enhanced his continued education.

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased


Less water is used through drip irrigation.

surface runoff
increased
x
decreased


Better infiltration due to better soil structure due to the manure application, thus less runoff.

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced


Less soil compaction due to better soil structure due to the manure application.

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased


Adding sheep manure increases nutrients.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


Adding sheep manure increases organic matter.

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
x
increased


The organic farming enforces the lemon trees against pests and diseases.

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased


The organic farming enforces the lemon trees against pests and diseases.

flood impacts
increased
x
decreased


Flood impacts is less due to better soil structure.

landslides/ debris flows
increased
x
decreased


Land movements decrease due to better soil structure.

drought impacts
increased
x
decreased


Drought impacts decrease due to more soil moisture.

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased


Increase the carbon in the soil due to organic farming and the manure application.

Off-site impacts
damage on neighbours' fields
increased
x
reduced


No pollution by herbicides/pesticides.

impact of greenhouse gases
increased
x
reduced


Increase the carbon in the soil due to organic farming and the manure application.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

The land user had problems to cope with the money input to establish the SLM technology at the beginning of the process, but he believes that in 10 years the perspective will be better and he will recover the money spent at the beginning.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: summer
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal rainfall increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: wet/ rainy season
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
x
very well
flash flood

not well at all
x
very well
landslide

not well at all
x
very well
insect/ worm infestation

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
The dose of manure application was modified regarding the climatological conditions.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Reduction of soil degradation
  • Enhacement of soil fertility
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Improvement in crop production
  • Contribution towards a better social acknowledgment of the sustainable farming
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • The high dependency on climatological conditions Pay special attention in soil structure
  • Strict control of organic amendment input with exhaustive verifications and monitoring of the sheep manure Improve verification process.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Short response time to the weather risk or plagues Daily monitoring of crop and soil response.

References

Compiler
  • Alicia Morugán-Coronado
Editors
Reviewer
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Gudrun Schwilch
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Maart 27, 2017
Last update: Aug. 1, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • no:
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International