Fenced Alfalfa orchard (Conder Malgorzata)

Orchard establishment on a former wheat plot, by planting fruit tree seedlings in combination with sowing Alfalfa (Tajikistan)

Description

Conversion of wheat monocropping into an Alfalfa plot with the aim to establish an orchard

In 2009 the farmer changed his wheat plot into an Alfalfa plot where he also planted fruit tree seedlings in between to establish an orchard. One hectare is used for the perennial cropping of Alfalfa. Alfalfa cropping supplements beneficial soil functions which are crucial for the establishment of an orchard. The plot lies on a narrow plateau next to other wheat crops. The plot is mainly bordered by fruit and nut orchards on a gentle slope, and by a steep slope of the riverbed. A solid fence prevents boars from entering the area through the nut orchard. The plot is not accessible by the steep slope. Two fences are built from the side of the neighboring wheat plots. One fence works like an entrance gate to all the plots on that plateau. A second fence indicates the boundaries between the farmers' Alfalfa crop and the wheat plots belonging to other farmers. The whole family is working on the farm land, consisting of several plots which are distributed over the valley. The children are mainly guarding the cropland.

Purpose of the Technology: In order to establish an orchard, first the farmer planted Alfalfa, which maintains more moisture in the soil and hence creates favorable conditions for tree growth. The wheat cropping was drying out the soil. Therefore during heavy rainfall events water infiltration was limited, and the strong runoff washed away the wheat crop. It was the farmer’s initiative to change the crop management, but Caritas Switzerland supported him with a financial grant. Alfalfa can be harvested several times a year, which he can use as fodder for the livestock or as cash crop.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The first year after the crop rotation there was no benefit, as the Alfalfa did not give any harvest yet. According to the farmer, Alfalfa seeds were relatively cheap (15 TJS per kg) and result in a good harvest. Currently he is harvesting Alfalfa three times a year, wheat could only be harvested once a year. The whole family was involved in the establishment of the alfalfa crop and tree planting, by ploughing, sawing Alfalfa, planting the seedlings and constructing the fence. Despite the fence, the crop is often guarded by the farmer or his children because boars enter his property. After the first year some seedlings dried out which he had to replace. Presently, little maintenance is required, only guarding and cutting Alfalfa.

Natural / human environment: The farmer’s plot is situated on a plateau on the other side of the riverbed, from where the village of Momandion is located. It takes some 15 minutes to get from their house to the plot. One of his neighbors adopted the technology of sowing Alfalfa and planting fruit tree seedlings.

Location

Location: Muminabad, Khatlon, Tajikistan, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 70.0513, 38.08589

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Harvested bundles of Alfalfa (Conder Malgorzata)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: fodder crops - alfalfa
    • Tree and shrub cropping: fruits, other
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wo: offsite degradation effects
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pk: slaking and crusting, Pi: soil sealing
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
SLM group
  • improved plant varieties/ animal breeds
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • management measures - M1: Change of land use type

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The farmer’s property is located on a plateau, surrounded by an upper orchard on a slope (in the top right corner on the figure) and delimited by a steep embankment (on the left on the figure). The Lucerne plot is protected by a fence and the embankment to hinder intrusions of boars. There is a well locked entrance to get to the crop. A second fence protects the adjacent wheat crops and the Lucerne plot. Around 600 fruit trees are planted in the crop leaving a buffer strip of Lucerne.

Location: Momandion, Obishur watershed. Muminabad, Kathlon, Tajikistan

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase / maintain water stored in soil, spatial arrangement and diversification of land use

Secondary technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), increase of infiltration

Cover cropping
Material/ species: Alfalfa to recover soil for orchard

Aligned: -contour
Number of plants per (ha): 400
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 3
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 2

Change of land use type: Conversion from wheat to fenced Alfalfa crop and orchard
Alfalfa crop has a twofold function, as a crop which is harvested several times a year and as cover crop to reestablish soil properties
Author: Malgorzata Conder

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 12.40
Most important factors affecting the costs
Fencing is very expensive due to high material costs. It is a very laborious and time consuming work.
Establishment activities
  1. Buying and planting 600 trees: 10 Min/ tree for digging (Timing/ frequency: once)
  2. After first year: 100 trees dried out (Timing/ frequency: once)
  3. Fencing 400 m, by 6-7 pers, 10-11 days (8 h a day) (Timing/ frequency: once (spring))
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Planting trees Persons/day 12.5 12.4 155.0 37.0
Planting trees for replacment Persons/day 2.1 12.4 26.04 100.0
Plowing labour Persons/day 1.0 12.4 12.4
Sowing Persons/day 0.27 12.4 3.35
Equipment
Plowing machine days 1.0 103.5 103.5 37.0
Petrol litres 120.0 1.1383333 136.6 37.0
Plant material
Buying trees trees 600.0 0.62116666 372.7 37.0
Buying tree replacments trees 100.0 1.035 103.5 100.0
Seeds kg 20.0 3.1 62.0 37.0
Construction material
Fence area 1.0 1490.7 1490.7 37.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 2'465.79
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 2'465.79
Maintenance activities
  1. Harvesting/Cutting Alfalfa 3 times and seeds 1 time, 8 Pers one week (first cut) (Timing/ frequency: 4 times a year)
  2. Soil loosening around 600 trees (Timing/ frequency: spring/ once)
  3. Looking after the orchard, 2 or 5 hours per day (Timing/ frequency: every day)
  4. Pruning after 5 years (in future), one month (Timing/ frequency: spring/ once every five years)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Soil loosening Persons/day 9.375 12.4 116.25 100.0
Looking after orchard days 365.0 100.0
Pruning after 5 years Persons/day 25.0 12.4 310.0 100.0
Harvesting/Cutting Alfalfa Persons/day 192.0 12.4 2380.8 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 2'807.05
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 2'807.05

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
700mm in winter-spring, July-Sept dry season (At 1200mm asl, wheater station Muminabad)
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

fodder production
decreased
x
increased

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

demand for irrigation water
increased
x
decreased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased


No fertlizer, less controlling

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

Livelihood and human well-being
reduced
x
improved

Ecological impacts
surface runoff
increased
x
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts
damage on neighbours' fields
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Alfalfa seeds are more expensive than other seeds (e.g. wheat) and in the first year just one cut can be done. In the second year already several cuts are possible and assure a high yield. It is expensive to establish an orchard and in the first 5 years there is no harvest.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
drought

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • After one time sowing, several cuts are possible from the second year on.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Spread the experience of the farmer.
  • Perennial crops are beneficial to soil and increases the income of the farmer.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Spread technology through demonstrations, work shops etc.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Alfalfa gives good yield and is a good conservation measure for soil and water.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Workshops or institutional incentives for farmers to promote perennial crops.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • First year might result in more input than output because just one cut is possible and an orchard must grow at least 5 years to give fruits. Raise awareness about long-term benefits or give incentives in the establishment phase.

References

Compiler
  • Malgorzata Conder
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Sept. 10, 2012
Last update: Aug. 5, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International