Mr. Habibu Hasssan spreading coffee berries one of the major source his income. (Godfrey Baraba)

Buhaya agroforestry system (Tanzania, United Republic of)

Ekibanja (Kihaya)

Description

Traditional agroforestry system comprising mixture of banana, coffee, fruit trees, biannual crops, annual crops and timber trees which together optimize the use of soil, moisture and space.

Buhaya agro forest system is a mix of annual and perennial crops together with trees and shrubs are densely planted on a restricted area usually 0.5 -2ha per household to increase crop yield, wood production and conserve soil and water. Buhaya agro forest system is applied on individual owned land specific at home steady. In this technology a plot of 1ha comprises of :
1.Perennial crops (coffee, banana, ) on average (10,000/36 coffee plants can be planted in one hector randomly in the alternating manner with banana, 10,000/25 banana stools) can be planted in 1ha randomly in the alternating manner with coffee.
2.Annual and biannual crops (eg. Maize, beans, cassava, sweet potatoes, yams etc) are planted in the between spaces. Maize and beans are planted twice in the short (Masika) and long rains (Vuli) where tubers are planted at any time throughout the year.
3.Trees and shrubs (eg. Makkhamia spps, Maesopsis and migorora). Trees are planted along the boundaries spaced at an average of 15m to act as wind break and timber production. Shrubs are planted at closed distance in between trees to act as live fence.
Buhaya agro forest system was practiced since early 1900. Application of farmyard manures and crop residue mulch are the supportive measures. The land owners keep small livestock/ few cattle under zero grazing to obtain manure for soil fertility improvem

Purpose of the Technology: The purposes for applying the technology is to control soil erosion and nutrient improvement.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The establishment of Buhaya agro forest system is done on a virgin land starting in the dry season July to September and it normally takes 2-5years by doing the following activities.
1.To prepare the land by cutting, removing/burning shrubs and grasses followed by land tillage. This is the difficult job and sometimes it can force the farmer to plant annual crops before planting perennial crops due to inadequate preparation time.
2.To dig holes of different size according to what crop is meant for in the alternating manner. This activity is done after harvesting annual crops in shot rainfalls (March to June).
3.To plant banana in July and August followed by coffee in September to November and March to May next year.
4.To plant trees along the boundaries followed by planting shrubs between the trees spacing to create a live fence.
5.To plant cassava, yams, pawpaw, avocados and mangoes. These are planted randomly and in a few quantity.
The maintenance of Buhaya agro forest system is the simple but tidies job requires all the year to be working in the garden. The required activities are
1.To weed the field as preparation for planting seasonal crops( i.e maize and beans) twice per year in dry seasons.
2.To remove unwanted banana suckers (desuckering) and harvested banana stems in order to maintain a required number of plants( mother, daughter and grand daughter) per stool. This requires a lot of time for assessing the plant health as well as spacing.
3.To plant and harvest maize and beans twice per year.
4.To prune coffee trees, harvest coffee cherry, dry, and market them once per year.
5.To replace harvested cassava and yams as required.

Location

Location: Bukoba District (Kyema village), Tanzania, Tanzania, United Republic of

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 31.7114, -1.45695

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction
Mr.Habibu Shabani prunning coffee as one of mantainance activities. (Godfrey Baraba (BOX 491, Bukoba))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Ja - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, legumes and pulses - beans, root/tuber crops - sweet potatoes, yams, taro/cocoyam, other
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping: banana/plantain/abaca
    • Tree and shrub cropping: coffee, open grown, fruits, other, Makkhamia spps, Maesopsis and Migorora
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
  • Grazing land
      Animal type: cattle - non-dairy working

    Water supply
    • rainfed
    • mixed rainfed-irrigated
    • full irrigation

    Purpose related to land degradation
    • prevent land degradation
    • reduce land degradation
    • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
    • adapt to land degradation
    • not applicable
    Degradation addressed
    • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
    • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
    SLM group
    • agroforestry
    SLM measures
    • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
    • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover, V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
    • management measures - M1: Change of land use type

    Technical drawing

    Technical specifications

    Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

    Calculation of inputs and costs
    • Costs are calculated:
    • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
    • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
    • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 1.60
    Most important factors affecting the costs
    The most determinate factor affecting the cost is labour. This is because the technology is labour intensive, while labour force is inadequate.
    Establishment activities
    1. Land preparation (Timing/ frequency: July to August)
    2. Digging holes (Timing/ frequency: Jan & Jul)
    3. Planting banana and coffee (Timing/ frequency: Jul to Sep)
    4. Planting trees and shrubs (Timing/ frequency: Feb & Sep)
    5. Planting biannual crops (Timing/ frequency: March, Apr, Oct, Nov &Dec)
    Establishment inputs and costs
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Land preparation persons/day/ha 333.3 1.25 416.63 100.0
    Digging holes persons/day/ha 81.63 1.25 102.04 100.0
    Planting banana and coffee persons/day/ha 33.33 1.25 41.66 100.0
    Planting trees, shrubs and biannual crops persons/day/ha 158.6 1.25 198.25 100.0
    Equipment
    Axes pieces/ha 5.55 3.128 17.36 100.0
    Machete pieces/ha 5.55 1.877 10.42 100.0
    Hand hoes pieces/ha 5.55 3.128 17.36 100.0
    Spades pieces/ha 2.7 3.148 8.5 100.0
    Plant material
    Banana suckers pieces/ha 571.0 0.1875 107.06 100.0
    Coffee seedlings pieces/ha 357.0 0.3125 111.56 100.0
    Mysopsis pieces/ha 33.0 0.125 4.13 100.0
    Migorora pieces/ha 80.0 0.125 10.0 100.0
    Avocado pieces/ha 11.0 3.167 34.84 100.0
    Mangoes pieces/ha 5.0 3.125 15.63 100.0
    Cassava pieces/ha 47.0 0.0317 1.49 100.0
    Yams pieces/ha 26.0 0.031 0.81
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'097.74
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1'097.74
    Maintenance activities
    1. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: Feb & Sep)
    2. Desuckering (Timing/ frequency: Jul to Sept)
    3. Planting annual crops (Timing/ frequency: March to Jul & Sep to Dec)
    4. Punning, harvesting and drying coffee (Timing/ frequency: May to October)
    5. Cassava and yams harvesting. (Timing/ frequency: Jan to Dec)
    Maintenance inputs and costs
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Weeding persons/day/ha 200.0 1.25 250.0 100.0
    Desuckering persons/day/ha 57.0 1.25 71.25 100.0
    Planting annual crops persons/day/ha 50.0 1.25 62.5 100.0
    Prunning, harvesting and drying coffee persons/day/ha 285.5 1.25 356.88 100.0
    Plant material
    Seeds pieces/ha 10.0 2.5 25.0 100.0
    Seedlings pieces/ha 26.0 0.031 0.81 100.0
    Cassava pieces/ha 48.0 0.0317 1.52 100.0
    Beans pieces/ha 20.0 1.25 25.0 100.0
    Other
    Labour: Cassava and yams harvesting persons/day/ha 2.3 1.25 2.88 100.0
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 795.84
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 795.84

    Natural environment

    Average annual rainfall
    • < 250 mm
    • 251-500 mm
    • 501-750 mm
    • 751-1,000 mm
    • 1,001-1,500 mm
    • 1,501-2,000 mm
    • 2,001-3,000 mm
    • 3,001-4,000 mm
    • > 4,000 mm
    Agro-climatic zone
    • humid
    • sub-humid
    • semi-arid
    • arid
    Specifications on climate
    Bimodal, length of dry period 180dys
    Thermal climate class: tropics
    Slope
    • flat (0-2%)
    • gentle (3-5%)
    • moderate (6-10%)
    • rolling (11-15%)
    • hilly (16-30%)
    • steep (31-60%)
    • very steep (>60%)
    Landforms
    • plateau/plains
    • ridges
    • mountain slopes
    • hill slopes
    • footslopes
    • valley floors
    Altitude
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    Technology is applied in
    • convex situations
    • concave situations
    • not relevant
    Soil depth
    • very shallow (0-20 cm)
    • shallow (21-50 cm)
    • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
    • deep (81-120 cm)
    • very deep (> 120 cm)
    Soil texture (topsoil)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Topsoil organic matter content
    • high (>3%)
    • medium (1-3%)
    • low (<1%)
    Groundwater table
    • on surface
    • < 5 m
    • 5-50 m
    • > 50 m
    Availability of surface water
    • excess
    • good
    • medium
    • poor/ none
    Water quality (untreated)
    • good drinking water
    • poor drinking water (treatment required)
    • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
    • unusable
    Water quality refers to:
    Is salinity a problem?
    • Ja
    • Nee

    Occurrence of flooding
    • Ja
    • Nee
    Species diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low
    Habitat diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low

    Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

    Market orientation
    • subsistence (self-supply)
    • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
    • commercial/ market
    Off-farm income
    • less than 10% of all income
    • 10-50% of all income
    • > 50% of all income
    Relative level of wealth
    • very poor
    • poor
    • average
    • rich
    • very rich
    Level of mechanization
    • manual work
    • animal traction
    • mechanized/ motorized
    Sedentary or nomadic
    • Sedentary
    • Semi-nomadic
    • Nomadic
    Individuals or groups
    • individual/ household
    • groups/ community
    • cooperative
    • employee (company, government)
    Gender
    • women
    • men
    Age
    • children
    • youth
    • middle-aged
    • elderly
    Area used per household
    • < 0.5 ha
    • 0.5-1 ha
    • 1-2 ha
    • 2-5 ha
    • 5-15 ha
    • 15-50 ha
    • 50-100 ha
    • 100-500 ha
    • 500-1,000 ha
    • 1,000-10,000 ha
    • > 10,000 ha
    Scale
    • small-scale
    • medium-scale
    • large-scale
    Land ownership
    • state
    • company
    • communal/ village
    • group
    • individual, not titled
    • individual, titled
    Land use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Water use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Access to services and infrastructure
    health

    poor
    good
    education

    poor
    good
    technical assistance

    poor
    good
    employment (e.g. off-farm)

    poor
    good
    markets

    poor
    good
    energy

    poor
    good
    roads and transport

    poor
    good
    drinking water and sanitation

    poor
    good
    financial services

    poor
    good

    Impacts

    Socio-economic impacts
    Crop production
    decreased
    increased

    Quantity before SLM: 16kg
    Quantity after SLM: 35kg

    wood production
    decreased
    increased

    land management
    hindered
    simplified


    All crops are weeded at once

    farm income
    decreased
    increased

    diversity of income sources
    decreased
    increased

    workload
    increased
    decreased

    Socio-cultural impacts
    food security/ self-sufficiency
    reduced
    improved


    Individual had excess food for sale

    health situation
    worsened
    improved

    cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
    reduced
    improved


    Individual exposuers to expatriet and trading partners

    SLM/ land degradation knowledge
    reduced
    improved


    No wind break events reported in the area

    situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
    worsened
    improved

    livelihood and human well-being
    reduced
    improved


    This technology supports high quality and quantity coffee and other crops production and as a results improves farmers income.

    Ecological impacts
    surface runoff
    increased
    decreased

    evaporation
    increased
    decreased

    soil moisture
    decreased
    increased

    soil cover
    reduced
    improved

    nutrient cycling/ recharge
    decreased
    increased

    biomass/ above ground C
    decreased
    increased

    plant diversity
    decreased
    increased

    pest/ disease control
    decreased
    increased

    wind velocity
    increased
    decreased

    Off-site impacts
    wind transported sediments
    increased
    reduced

    damage on neighbours' fields
    increased
    reduced

    damage on public/ private infrastructure
    increased
    reduced

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Benefits compared with establishment costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Benefits compared with maintenance costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Climate change

    Gradual climate change
    annual temperature increase

    not well at all
    very well
    Climate-related extremes (disasters)
    local rainstorm

    not well at all
    very well
    local windstorm

    not well at all
    very well
    drought

    not well at all
    very well
    general (river) flood

    not well at all
    very well
    Other climate-related consequences
    reduced growing period

    not well at all
    very well

    Adoption and adaptation

    Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
    • single cases/ experimental
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    Number of households and/ or area covered
    387 households covering 75 percent of the stated area
    Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
    • Ja
    • Nee
    To which changing conditions?
    • climatic change/ extremes
    • changing markets
    • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

    Conclusions and lessons learnt

    Strengths: land user's view
    • Diversification of production

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Improved farmers knowledge and skills in agroforestry systems management
    • Reliable income from multiple crops.

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Knowledge in farming as a business
    • Technology is traditional and widely accepted

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Strengthen linkages to sources of improved technologies
    • Reduced workload

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Ditto
    • Complimentarity of produced diverse crops

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Ditto
    Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
    • The technology is not complicated in terms of input requirements and application

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Improved farmer linkage to sources of improved materials e.g. research
    • Inputs are locally and readily available

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Facilitation of farmer own produced improved inputs
    • Maintenance costs decreases with increasing production period

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Ditto
    • Markets are readily available

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? Feeder road maintenance should be given higher priority
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
    • High competition of nutrients among different species Improved farmers knowledge and skills in agroforestry systems management
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
    • Some tree species host pests Improve farmers knowledge on tree pests prevention and cleaning
    • Limits farm mechanization Improved farmers knowledge and skills on improved maintenance without mechanization

    References

    Compiler
    • Godfrey Baraba
    Editors
    Reviewer
    • David Streiff
    • Alexandra Gavilano
    Date of documentation: Des. 7, 2012
    Last update: Aug. 6, 2019
    Resource persons
    Full description in the WOCAT database
    Linked SLM data
    Documentation was faciliated by
    Institution Project
    Key references
    • Kagera TAMP project website: http://www.fao.org/nr/kagera/partners-contacts/tanzania/en/
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International