Establishment of small bench terraces, using hoes, in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. The steep risers are compacted and a small drainage channel is formed on approximately every fourth terrace. (Samran Sombatpanit)

Small level bench terraces (Thailand)

Khan ban dai din khanard lek (Thai)

Description

Terraces with narrow beds, used for growing tea, coffee, and horticultural crops on hillsides cleared from forests.

The terraces described in this case study from northern Thailand are found on hilly slopes with deep soils. The climate is humid and tropical, with 1,700-2,000 mm of rainfall annually. The main aim of the terraces is to facilitate cultivation of tea or coffee on sloping land: erosion control is secondary. Coffee and tea, as well as flowers and vegetables, are good alternatives to opium poppies - which it is government policy to eradicate.

Purpose of the Technology: After clearing natural and secondary forests by slash and burn, terraces are aligned by eye - and constructed by hoe. The width of the bed is 1.0-1.5 m depending on slope, though there are no specific technical guidelines. The length of each terrace can be up to 25 m. Down the slope, after every 3-4 terraces, there are lateral drainage channels, approximately 20-30 cm wide and 10 cm deep. Situated at the foot of a riser, each channel has a gradient of 0.5% or less. Excess water - some of which cascades over the terrace risers, with some draining through the soil - is discharged through these channels, generally to natural waterways. The risers are steep, with a slope of above 100%, and without a defined lip.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Natural grass cover develops on the risers: this is cut back by hand hoe or machete, or completely removed. The grass is often burned. After harvest (of annual crops), the land is left until immediately before the next rainy season. The terraces at this stage are covered by weeds and grasses. Land is then tilled by hoe. The weeds and grasses are removed and heaped in piles outside the cropped area. They are not composted or used for mulching - and here an opportunity is missed. Where soil fertility is a problem, chemical fertilizers are used. Maintenance includes building up/repairing of risers and levelling of terrace beds as required.

Natural / human environment: The technology was pioneered, and continues to be practiced, by refugee immigrants from China looking for new areas to start farming. These immigrants first came in the 1950s, and cultivated simply through slash and burn techniques. During the 1970s they visited relatives in Taiwan and brought back the idea of small terraces. Originally they settled illegally, but eventually they were given official permission to stay. However, official title deeds to their land have not yet been allocated.

Location

Location: Amphur Mae Fa Luang, ChiangMai, Thailand

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 99.2598, 19.8917

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Well-established small bench terraces under horticultural crops, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. (Samran Sombatpanit)
Artist's impression of small bench terraces (Samran Sombatpanit (Bangkok, Thailand))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping: coffee, open grown, tea
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification
SLM group
  • cross-slope measure
  • water diversion and drainage
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S1: Terraces

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Layout of small level bench terraces. After every third or fourth terrace a lateral drainage channel is built. Later, protective grass cover is established on the risers (right).

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, reduction of slope angle, reduction of slope length

Secondary technical functions: control of concentrated runoff: impede / retard, increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil

Vegetative measure: grass on risers (optional)
Vegetative material: G : grass

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass

Terrace: bench level
Vertical interval between structures (m): 0.4
Spacing between structures (m): 0.3
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.4
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 1.5
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 25

Structural measure: drainage channels
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.1
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): .02 - .3

Construction material (earth): It is the earth dug in situ.

Lateral gradient along the structure: 0%

Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.
Author: Mats Gurtner

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Baht
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 37.0 Baht
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 2.16
Most important factors affecting the costs
The slope factor affects most because it will require longer time to construct.
Establishment activities
  1. Layout is simply by eye and best judgment. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Work begins on the lower part of the slope, and then progresses uphill. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Farmers cut into the hillside with hoes and drag the soil down to formthe risers and level the terrace beds. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Risers are then stabilised/compacted by hoe. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Baht) Total costs per input (Baht) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 270.0 270.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 275.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 7.43
Maintenance activities
  1. Weeds and grasses are removed and piled outside the cropping area. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Land is prepared through tillage by hoe. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Risers are built up/repaired where necessary. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Terrace beds may need levelling. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Baht) Total costs per input (Baht) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 45.0 45.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 45.0 45.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 90.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 2.43

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average 1600-1800 mm
Thermal climate class: tropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • illegal (initially) (see Annex T3)
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • illegal (initially) (see Annex T3)
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


Production is not decreased.

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

land management
hindered
x
simplified

farm income
decreased
x
increased

economic disparities
increased
x
decreased

workload
increased
x
decreased


Ease of cultivation. Can walk and work in the farm easier

Input constraints
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
community institutions
weakened
x
strengthened

national institutions
weakened
x
strengthened

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved

Ecological impacts
surface runoff
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 20
Quantity after SLM: 15

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


During dry spells due to increased infiltration

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 50
Quantity after SLM: 10
Soil erosion is reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

animal diversity
decreased
x
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
x
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
x
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
x
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
x
reduced

wind transported sediments
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
500
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • For facilitating picking of tea leaves
  • For using as farm path
  • For increasing soil fertility
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • A relatively cheap method of terracing which makes cultivation easier and provides erosion control

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Should be further promoted by extension
    agencies (in areas where cultivation is officially allowed). Allocation
    of official title deeds to land will speed up the adoption automatically.
  • For improving/maintaining soil fertility
  • For increasing the yield of tea leaves

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Inspecting the field during/after rain to see how efficient they are in conserving soil and water and repair as needed
  • For using as farm path
  • Compared with normal bench terraces, construction does not bring infertile subsoil to the surface.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Farmers have to pay for its construction. The government may be able to help in the future.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Does not lend itself to mechanisation: the terrace beds are narrow and only suited to hand hoeing. Teach farmers techniques of composting and/or mulching.
  • In this situation grasses and weeds are merely piled and burned rather
    than being used to improve soil fertility

References

Compiler
  • Samran Sombatpanit
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Maart 6, 2011
Last update: Aug. 7, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • No references:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International