Plantation with young Acacia trees on a 3m x 3m grid (Maarten De Boever)

Area closure and reforestation with Acacia (Tunisia)

Description

Protection and reforestation of degraded arid lands in pre-Saharan Tunisia.

Protection and reforestation of degraded arid lands in central and southern Tunisia (Bled Talah region) with tree species Acacia tortilis subsp. raddiana. A. raddiana is a native trees species which is able to tolerate extreme droughts and to persist on the edge of the Sahara desert. Acacia plantations are set up following a 3m x 3m grid using seedlings of A. raddiana. Seedlings are planted in the bottom of infiltration pits which are constructed for rainwater harvesting. Protection of the plantation area is established by means of a fence.

Purpose of the Technology: The purpose of afforestation is the rehabilitation of degraded drylands and restoration of the original forest-steppe ecosystem in the Bled Talah region, which suffered for over a century from overexploitation of natural resources and intensification of agricultural activities. Focus is put on the synergy between the protection of the natural resources with the involvement of local people and the improvement of their livelihoods.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The protection of the Bled Talah region was initiated in 1936 and from then on several actions were undertaken such as the construction of a tree nursery and the creation of Integral Protection Zones through complete fencing. The Bled Talah area was designated as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in 1977. Bou Hedma National Park was officially created by the Ministry of Forests in 1980 covering an area of approximately 16.000 ha. The park consists of three Integral Protection Zones or core areas which are completely fenced, two agricultural zones and two buffer zones. Since the 1970s, several reforestation campaigns with A. raddiana are conducted in the Integral Protection Zones.

Natural / human environment: Arid Tunisia, i.e. the central and southern part of Tunisia, is characterized by an extremely irregular spatiotemporal rainfall pattern, a limited amount of rain (350 mm maximum per year), a limited number of days of rain (15 to 40 days a year) and a high average annual temperature (18 to 21 °C).

Location

Location: Sidi Bouzid/Gafsa, Tunisia

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 9.64766, 34.47503

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Forest-steppe ecosystem of Acacia trees with shrubs and grasses (Maarten De Boever)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Grazing land
    • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
  • Forest/ woodlands
    • (Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands. Management: Selective felling
    Products and services: Timber, Fuelwood, Grazing/ browsing
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pk: slaking and crusting
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline, Bl: loss of soil life
  • water degradation - Hg: change in groundwater/aquifer level
SLM group
  • area closure (stop use, support restoration)
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover, V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S6: Walls, barriers, palisades, fences

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Fenced plantation with Acacia trees on a 3m x 3m grid with cross section of infiltration pit (length given in cm)

Location: National Park Bou Hedma. Sidi Bouzid

Date: 2014-02-04

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, improvement of ground cover, improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil, increase of biomass (quantity), promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Secondary technical functions: control of raindrop splash, control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, increase of surface roughness, improvement of water quality, buffering / filtering water, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting, reduction in wind speed

Aligned: -linear
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 1000
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 3
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 3

Trees/ shrubs species: Acacia raddiana

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 0%

Gradient along the rows / strips: 0%

Construction material (other): wire fence
Author: Maarten De Boever

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Tunisian Dinar
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 1.65 Tunisian Dinar
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 6.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
The most determinate factor affecting the costs is tree nursing. This factor is not only labour intersive but also high in water demand.
Establishment activities
  1. seed collection (Timing/ frequency: June/July/August)
  2. tree nursery (Timing/ frequency: July/August)
  3. plantation (Timing/ frequency: rainy season (sept-->dec))
  4. installation fence (Timing/ frequency: 1 day)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tunisian Dinar) Total costs per input (Tunisian Dinar) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 330.0 330.0
Construction material
Iron wire fence ha 1.0 1600.0 1600.0
iron poles ha 1.0 800.0 800.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 2'730.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1'654.55
Maintenance activities
  1. follow up plantation (irrigation) (Timing/ frequency: weekly 1 day by 2 workers for 1 year)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tunisian Dinar) Total costs per input (Tunisian Dinar) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 30.0 30.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 30.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 18.18

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Rainy season September-December
Thermal climate class: subtropics
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
x
increased

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased

wood production
decreased
x
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved

Improved livelihoods and human well-being
decreased
x
increased


The technology improves the livelihoods of local people directly through income generation from employment in the park and indirectly by the improvement of climatological conditions in the neighbourhood of the park.

Ecological impacts
harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
x
improved

surface runoff
increased
x
decreased

excess water drainage
reduced
x
improved

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
x
recharge

evaporation
increased
x
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
x
increased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased

Off-site impacts
buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
x
improved

wind transported sediments
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local windstorm

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • protection (less soil degradation) and rehabilitation of the natural ecosystem

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? involvement of local people
  • direct and indirect improvement of the livelihoods of local people

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? awareness raising
  • improved soil carbon stocks

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? maintenance of existing and establishment of new plantations
  • increased biodiversity (trees act as fertility islands facilitating the growth of ground cover plants)

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? maintenance of existing and establishment of new plantations
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • no tree planting initiatives undertaken by local people incentives/subsidies from government
  • no public awareness of importance to conserve natural resources set up of a large educational program with regular activities in the park and further elaboration of the small ecological museum

References

Compiler
  • Maarten De Boever
Editors
Reviewer
  • Fabian Ottiger
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: April 23, 2013
Last update: Aug. 7, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International