Typical examples of apple trees intercropped with wheat. Alignment of the trees is often a compromise between wind direction, slope and shape of plot. (Hanspeter Liniger (Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) Uneversity of Bern.))

Orchard-based agroforestry (Tajikistan)

Description

An agroforestry system where legumes and cereals are planted in fruit orchards, giving simultaneous production and conservation benefits.

In the Faizabad region, Tajikistan, an area which is characterised by hilly topography, and deep but highly erodible loess soils, farmers traditionally cultivate beans and wheat in combination with fruit trees. This was a rather unsystematic agroforestry system, and during Soviet times (in the 1980s) fruit production was intensified. Pure-stand orchards were established: the land was levelled and on slopes exceeding 20%, terraces were constructed mechanically. The density of trees was increased, and the little space remaining between was used for hay production. Annual cropping was stopped.

Purpose of the Technology: After the Soviet era, farmers reduced the number of trees, allowing room for inter-cropping. They also established new orchards according to this same pattern. Those who farm rented land merely inter crop wheat, whereas the few farmers who own their land, rotate crops with two years of wheat, followed by one of legumes (beans or lucern). Crops are grown both for home consumption and sale.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The density of apples was reduced by expanding the spacing from approx 5 m to 10 m between rows, and from 2 m to 4 m within rows. Along each row of trees a 2-3 m strip of grass was left to grow. The layout of fruit trees in lines is a compromise between being along the contour, and against the prevailing wind. After harvesting of the fruit, between August and October, farmers sow their annual crops.

Natural / human environment: This agroforestry system provides protection against strong winds, heavy rains and flooding. Soil erosion (by water) has been reduced due to improved soil cover by the inter cropping, and through leaf litter, which is left to decompose on the ground. Furthermore, after harvesting, about three quarters of the crop residues are left on the field as mulch. The remainder is used as fodder. Soil organic matter within the current agroforestry system is considerably higher than in the surrounding grazing areas. Soil fertility has improved also: beans can fix 60-80 kg/ha/year of nitrogen. Compared with other crops, wheat provides the best erosion protection. Since the lateral rooting system of the apple trees reaches only 1-1.5 m from the trunk, competition for nutrients is not a major problem. Neither is there a problem with shade, since during the crop establishment period the trees have lose their leaves. In order to increase production, farmers plan to apply supplementary irrigation where possible.

Location

Location: Faizabad, Tajikistan, Faizabad, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 69.1931, 38.5282

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Typical examples of apple trees intercropped with wheat. Alignment of the trees is often a compromise between wind direction, slope and shape of plot. (Hanspeter Liniger (Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) Uneversity of Bern.))
-

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Ja - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: legumes and pulses - beans, cereals - wheat (spring), lucerne
    • Tree and shrub cropping: pome fruits (apples, pears, quinces, etc.)

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
SLM group
  • agroforestry
  • windbreak/ shelterbelt
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A7: Others
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover, V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S1: Terraces

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Fruit trees intercropped with wheat (or beans): note the fruit trees are aligned in a 'compromise' position between the direction of the prevailing wind and the slope.

Location: Faizabad. Faizabad, Tajikistan

Date: 25-07-2004

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), reduction in wind speed, improvement of soil fertility (with crop rotation incl. Beans+lucerne)

Secondary technical functions: control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, reduction of slope angle, improvement of subsoil structure (hardpan), water harvesting / increase water supply, retain/trap concentrated runoff (prevention of gully erosion)

Mulching
Material/ species: leaf litter, crop residues

Rotations / fallows
Material/ species: wheat, legumes

Aligned: -against wind
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs, G : grass
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 2-6
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 10
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 4
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 2-3

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 20-60%

terrace: forward sloping: earth
Author: Mats Gurtner, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. Planting of fruit orchard (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Thinning: doubling the spacing between trees (by farmers, after Soviet period) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Hand planting of fruit tree seedlings (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. planting fruit trees (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. 1. Levelling of steep land into terraces with graders (Timing/ frequency: None)
  6. Planting of fruit orchards (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Planting of fruit orchard ha 1.0 60.0 60.0 100.0
Thinning and hand lanting ha 2.0 10.0 20.0 100.0
Equipment
machine use ha 1.0 120.0 120.0 100.0
tools 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
Plant material
seedlings ha 1.0 250.0 250.0
Fertilizers and biocides
fertilizer ha 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
biocides ha 1.0 30.0 30.0 100.0
pesticides ha 1.0 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 570.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 570.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Applying organic manure for crops and trees (Timing/ frequency: (November to March))
  2. Ploughing to depth of 25–30 cm for annual crops (Timing/ frequency: (November to March))
  3. Disc ploughing and harrowing . (Timing/ frequency: (March))
  4. Chemical fertiliser application to crops (Timing/ frequency: (once during season).)
  5. Pest management with chemicals (Timing/ frequency: (two-three times where possible/affordable))
  6. harvesting: wheat is the only crop, which can be harverted if tractor and petrol is available (Timing/ frequency: None)
  7. mulching trees (humus cover) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  8. cutting trees (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
applying organic manure for crops and trees ha 1.0 45.0 45.0 100.0
ploughing ha 2.0 10.0 20.0 100.0
Equipment
labour animal traction ha 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
labour harvesting ha 1.0 100.0
labour mulching and cutting ha 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
Plant material
seeds ha 1.0 30.0 30.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
fertilizer ha 1.0 50.0 50.0 100.0
biocides ha 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
compost manure ha 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 220.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 220.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

wood production
decreased
increased

farm income
decreased
increased

trees hinder farm operations
increased
decreased


difficult to apply pesticides using machinery and pesticides are very expensive.
Pruning is important, but farmers are new to the system and don’t always have the skills required

Socio-cultural impacts
community institutions
weakened
strengthened

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved

Ecological impacts
excess water drainage
reduced
improved

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

wind velocity
increased
decreased

nutrient use efficiency
decreased
increased

water use efficiency
decreased
increased

soil fertility
decreased
increased


Also biodiversity enhancement is medium (20-50%)

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced

wind transported sediments
increased
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
3500 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support in an area of 45 km^2
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Easy to convert orchards

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Land reform from state to private ownership would assist the process and strengthen farmers' associations.
  • Helps provide employment (mainly self- employment, partial employment of additional labourers) and increased self-sufficiency. With the cultivation of wheat, some farmers can solve their food problems and do not need an off-farm income.
  • Improvement of soil fertility and soil organic matter content

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Use all the crop residue and leaves of trees as cover (mulch).
  • Considerable reduction of soil erosion

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Adopt cover crop and rotate with other legumes and minimum tillage system.
  • Wider spacing between the rows of trees (to 10 m) is best for the agroforestry

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Remaining orchards with the original Soviet spacing of 5m between the rows should be thinned.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The irrigation system established during Soviet times required high maintenance inputs due to siltation of the canals. During the period of the civil war systems ceased to function, the canals filled up with sediments and finally overflowed during rain storms causing gully formation Control of water flow within the orchard using cutoff drains and drainage ditches.
  • Lines of trees which are planted up and down the slope to provide wind. Compromise in layout design (see description).
  • Orchards managed by state farms are often not well looked after. Leasing of land and awarding landholder certificates leads to improved orchard management.

References

Compiler
  • Loes Masselink
Editors
Reviewer
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • David Streiff
  • Lisa Soloveva
  • Olga Andreeva
  • Laura Ebneter
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: Jan. 17, 2011
Last update: Nov. 2, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International