Topsoil layer under mulch till during growing period (Gleysol) - incorporating organic residues in top-soil layer to increase organic matter (Matjaž Glavan)

Conservation tillage with incorporated mulched plant residues (mulch-till) (Slovenia)

Ohranitvena obdelava tal z vdelavo mulčenih rastlinskih ostankov

Description

Conservation tillage with incorporated mulched plant residues (mulch-till) of harvested crop or a green manure that are part of the rotation). Crop residues are partially incorporated/mixed in topsoil layer (down to 10 cm) using a disc harrow, chisel plough, sweeps, field cultivators, that leave more than 30% of the soil surface covered with crop residue. Technology contributes to less soil disturbance, increase of soil organic matter, better soil structure and better water holding capacity of soils.

1. The technology of conservational tillage with incorporated mulched plant residues (mulch-till) is applied in flatlands around the Municipality of Vrhnika with an average altitude of 290 m.a.s.l. Average annual precipitation is 1400 mm. The area is characterized with often stormy precipitation events and occasional summer droughts. A farmer applies this technology on various soil types from silty loam to silty clay Gleysol to organic Histosol soils (peat). Soils in the area are generally moderately deep to deep with medium soil organic matter (Gleysol) of 3-7% or with a high share of organic matter (Histosol) of >20% (Ljubljana moors). The area has good availability of surface water and groundwater of good drinking quality. Gleysol areas are drained (drainage systems) to prevent floods to enable cultivation. Histosol areas are drained (open-channel drainage systems) to enable arable crop production. However, due to high groundwater and many surface water sources, certain areas are regularly flooded during flood events mostly in late autumn, winter and spring. Salinity is not a problem due to high precipitation and leaching. Farmer practices rotational agriculture. Less than 5% of income coming from off-farm activities. The examined farm household has an average wealth and is fully mechanized/motorized. the farm has good access to services and infrastructure. The examined farm is medium in scale with land partly owned by the land user and partly leased from other private owners.The general biodiversity of the area is medium on Gleysols to high on Histosol where nature protection Landscape Park of Ljubljansko Barje (The Ljubljana Moors Landscape Park) is located.

Part of the farmers land parcels is located inside boundaries of Krajinski park Ljubljansko barje /Ljubljana Moor Landscape park. Park takes a lot of actions to secure peat soils. This almost 16,000 hectares large lowland marshy plain is marked by an interminable mosaic of grasslands, broadleaf woodlands, fields, ditches and hedges.

The farmer decided to abandon conventional ploughing technology and to start with conservational tillage technology when he noticed that the organic layer of peat soils in these areas started to become thinner. Farmer introduced this technology to preserve peat soils of Ljubljana Moors on his parcels in 2015. With ploughing, peat was mixed and decomposing - mineralise. In 18th-century peat layers of up to 2m depth were exploited for the same use as firewood. Only shallow layers of peat soil (up to 1 m) are still covering agricultural areas. As peat is a source of fertility farmers are seeking ways of preserving it. Farmer Anton Mrzlikar took a lead and started with conservational tillage with incorporated mulched plant residues (mulch-till).

Video https://vimeo.com/97415985 presents the effects of conservational tillage with incorporated mulched plant residues (mulch-till) on soil stability. This is a simulation of abundant summer rain and its impact on the tilled soils in terms of water infiltration capacity and erodibility. The result of this simulation is presented very clearly. It shows the difference between long-term conventional versus conservation tillage (mulch-till). Conventional tillage ploughs the top 25-28 cm of the soil at least once or twice a year. The soil is inverted, its structure breaks down and the surface is left bare. The first raindrops break the structural aggregates causing soil surface siltation and blockage of the soil pores. Thus vertical water flow is blocked and redirected as surface runoff, causing distinct erosion. If fertilizers and pesticides are used, the water flow will transport them, along with the soil particles, to surface waters where they cause pollution or surface ponding on the fields. This leads to an uneven distribution of substances across the field surface.
In conservation tillage (mulch-till), a shallow, 10 cm layer of topsoil is mixed with organic residues which are thus retained near and on the surface. In this way, soil structure is reinforced with good soil water infiltration and absorption. Despite heavy rainfall, the soils do not show any signs of erosion. There is no surface flow. Water drains into the soil vertical flow where it is available to the plants.

2. The farmer usees of 4-row-disk harrow tillage machinery (vario-disc) on arable fields for all crop types. When cultivating fields he crosses fields 1 - 2 times (depends on soil moisture). Every few years he uses chisels to break and shatters (aerate) the soils (depends on crop type - cereals and drought years). After main/first crop he seeds various cover crops (if fodder is needed they harvested it otherwise is used for green manure). He uses manure 30-40 t/ha. He applies typical dairy cow farm rotation (cereals/maize/soya/grass-clover mix). Cover crops are classified as rapes, cereals, oats, grass-clover, grass.

3. The main function is an increase of organic matter, retain water, increase soil biodiversity, stabilise soil structure in the soils and reduce water erosion, as well as reduce energy consumption and costs. This leads to better (1) productivity due to nutrients slow-release, (2) better water holding capacity and (3) decreased soil compaction threat. The technology was introduced to prevent decomposition of organic matter on Ljubljana moor peat soils.

4. Major inputs needed to establish is to change machinery and to gain new knowledge and experiences. They had to buy 4-row disc harrows, chisels plough and new seeders (maize). Seeding machines for cereals and oilseed rape are hired from other farmers. It is important that soils are covered all year round. Soils must be dry when cultivated.

5. The benefits are (1) increase in soil organic matter, (2) increase soil water holding capacity, (3) to maintain soil productivity, (4) increase in yields quantity and quality, (5) reduce energy consumption, (6) reduce workload - 3-4 times less time used for cultivation, (7) reduce costs.

6. Land users like (1) reduced workload and energy consumption, (2) positive impact on soil fertility and stability, (3) preserves organic matter - decrease peat soils decomposition, (4) as soils need to be covered all the time they produce more feed for cows, (5) smooths surface fields, (6) with disc harrow is easy to till soils even when residues are present on fields, (7) less soil compaction
Land users dislike: (1) investment cost for new machinery are high, (2) time to change in doing things and practice, (3) on clay soils (Gleysol) surface ponding is occurring, (4) soils need to be drier for tilling in comparison to ploughing.

Location

Location: Podlipa, Vrhnika. This specific farmer applies this technology on Ljubljansko barje, othewise is applied all over Slovenia, Central Slovenia, Slovenia

No. of Technology sites analysed: 10-100 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 14.29676, 45.99015
  • 14.33642, 45.99025
  • 14.34412, 45.99765
  • 14.35474, 45.99541
  • 14.35255, 45.99666
  • 14.32627, 45.97273
  • 14.2964, 45.98341
  • 14.30633, 45.98599
  • 14.29346, 45.98589
  • 14.26451, 45.98554
  • 14.32458, 45.9848

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: Ja

Date of implementation: 2015; less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Soil surface after direct seeding of the field using conservation tillage and the incorporation of mulched residues (mulch-till) (Rok Mihelič)
4-row disc harrow in conservation tillage (mulch-till) (Rok Mihelič)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Nee

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - maize - legumes - grass-clover mix. Cropping system: Maize or similar rotation with hay/pasture
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? Nee
    Is crop rotation practiced? Ja

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Ps: subsidence of organic soils, settling of soil
SLM group
  • minimal soil disturbance
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment (A 3.2: Reduced tillage (> 30% soil cover))

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
None
Author: Matjaž Glavan, Rok Mihelič

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 30 ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: EUR
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.9 EUR
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 50 EUR
Most important factors affecting the costs
The starting cost - The type of machinery is needed that has to be robust and heavy to much-till and seed into the soil. The machinery must be in use to return a profit. Working hours are reduced now (no ploughing). Machine operators with more competences can reduce costs.
Establishment activities
  1. Preparation of fields: Leveling depressions, reconstruction of drainage channels, using chisels to loose, break and aerate soil in deeper layers (Timing/ frequency: two year before implemenation, dry soil.)
  2. Purchase of 4-row disc harrow (Timing/ frequency: 1st year)
  3. Purchase of seeder for maize (Timing/ frequency: 1st year)
  4. Purchase of seeder for cover crops (Timing/ frequency: 1st year)
  5. Hire seeder for cereals (wheat, barley) (Timing/ frequency: 1st year)
  6. Home made chisel plow for loosening the soil (Timing/ frequency: 2nd year)
  7. Purchase of spraying machine (Timing/ frequency: 3rd year)
  8. Purchase of GPS navigation system (Timing/ frequency: 3rd year)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 30 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (EUR) Total costs per input (EUR) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
chisel plow material (home made) EUR/piece 1.0 6500.0 6500.0 100.0
seeder fo cover crops EUR/piece 1.0 2500.0 2500.0 50.0
seeder for maize EUR/piece 1.0 7500.0 7500.0 50.0
4-row disk harrow EUR/piece 1.0 23000.0 23000.0 50.0
sprayer EUR/piece 1.0 12.5 12.5 25.0
GPS navigation EUR/piece 1.0 2500.0 2500.0 100.0
hire seeder for cereals EUR/ha 15.0 50.0 750.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 42'762.5
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 47'513.89
Maintenance activities
  1. Maintenance of 4-disc harrow (Timing/ frequency: 6 time per year, before or after use of equipment)
  2. Maintenance of Spayer (Timing/ frequency: before use nozzels check, after use cleaning)
  3. Maintenance of seeder for maize (Timing/ frequency: before and after use)
  4. Maintenance of seeder for cover crops (Timing/ frequency: before and after use)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 30 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (EUR) Total costs per input (EUR) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Maintenance of 4-disc harrow hour 6.0 6.25 37.5 100.0
Maintenance of Spayer hour 6.0 6.25 37.5 100.0
Maintenance of seeder for maize hour 4.0 6.25 25.0 100.0
Maintenance of seeder for cover crops hour 1.0 6.25 6.25 100.0
Equipment
Lubricant cartridge for4-disc harrow cartridge 18.0 5.0 90.0 100.0
Nozzels for Spayer nozzel 20.0 4.0 80.0 100.0
Lubricant cartridge for seeder for maize cartridge 4.0 5.0 20.0 100.0
Lubricant cartridge for seeder for cover crops cartridge 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 301.25
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 334.72

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Heavy summer thunderstorms and showers. Local precipitation.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

crop quality
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased


It increased due to the fact that soil has to be covered at all times (grass, clover, cover crops) to retain soil moisture and prevent soil erosion and to provide an optimal living condition for soil life (fauna, flora). Previously the land was left bare after harvesting cereals until autumn or even spring.

fodder quality
decreased
increased

animal production
decreased
increased


Due to more fodder, the farmer managed to increase the number of livestock (dairy cows).

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


Due to the fact that soils are not ploughed anymore, a farmer has in wet years (more precipitation in a short period of time, especially in the springtime) problems on organic marshland and clay gley soils being fully saturated. This causes a reduction in the germination of seeds and weaker growth of plants due to hypoxia.

product diversity
decreased
increased


More different types of cover crops in production. Some are used as nitrogen fixators or for loosening the soils with deep rots.

land management
hindered
simplified


The land management simplified due to fewer machines needed and less time need for land cultivation and soil preparation.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Less petrol nedeed for land cultivation.

farm income
decreased
increased


More livestock means more income.

workload
increased
decreased


Workload decreased due to abandoning of ploughing.

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


The farmer observed positive impacts and seeks for more knowledge on this topic to improve its practice.

Ecological impacts
surface runoff
increased
decreased

evaporation
increased
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced

soil compaction
increased
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

vegetation cover
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

drought impacts
increased
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
decreased


Difficult to quantify. An increase in soil organic matter has an impact on CO2 sequestration.

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits are on short term slightly negative due to investment costs, but in the long term they are positive - they pay off. Maintenance benefits are positive for short as well as on long-term returns as less machinery and less land management activities is needed.

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Season: summer
annual rainfall

not well at all
very well
seasonal rainfall increase

not well at all
very well
Season: spring
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
heatwave

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
Only one farmer in the area that uses this technology. On the map you can observe his fields. In the last year many of his collegues observed advantages of this technology and hires his machinery as agriculture service of tillage. In majority of times before cover crops seeding.
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Reduction of workload (no ploughing, less time spent on the field)
  • Change in farmers mindset is longlasting; they are forced to gain new knowledge on technology impact on soil condition
    With more knowledge and better handling of technology, the cost of maintenance and time spent in the field can reduce significantly.
  • Increase in green mass yield (clover, grass) - it can be used as feed for livestock or green manure.
    Soil covered all year round + residues impact increase in soil organic matter, soil water content, biological activity, soil structure, less soil compaction.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Cost and time reductions are substantial - 3-4 times less in comparsio to conventional - ploughing.
  • Farmers became aware of the importance of conservation soil management and its impact on soil properties and finally on the process of production-chain (soil-feed-milk).
    With proper shaping of knowledge (advising, education) - Conservational tillage has the potential to develop into the direction of organic farming.
  • Soil structure and fertility improve
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • On heavy soils (Glaysoils) surface ponding can occur if the farmer is not experienced with using technology. Observe weather regularly and follow meteorological forecasts. Try to avoid wet periods.
  • Weed may be a problem in the warmer part of the year, mainly after cereals are harvested. They use herbicide and adapt or improve crop types in rotation.
  • Peatland on Ljubljana moor. There are small parcels and soil in springtime is wet prohibiting to cultivate at any time (high water table). Observe weather regularly and follow meteorological forecasts. They have to observe soil water content conditions periodically at peatland parcels.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Farmers still need to use herbicides as weeds are a problem especially in the early stage of crop growing (narrow-leaf) and in the last stage when crops go into senescence and light gets to the ground (broad-leaf). As this is a conventional type of farm, they use herbicides. However, with the promotion of organic agriculture, the expansion of vegetable production, and innovations in GPS and sensors technology hoeing/weeding machines/equipment is getting popular.
    This problem is even more problematic in light/alluvial soils.
  • Surface ponding on heavy soils is a problem in case of longlasting rain periods in spring, which are due to climate change more often in the described area. It is crucial to use chisel plow in this soils to break soil layers deeper and provide drainage potential of this soils.
    In light alluvial soils, this problem is not observed.
  • When a farmer in under Slovenian agricultural conditions decides to change from conventional to conservation tillage, it has to change all machinery. Farmers need to get as much as possible information on technology. Farmers have to make a business plan. EU funds can help with subsidy payments for investments on the farm (approx. 50-60%).

References

Compiler
  • Matjaz Glavan
Editors
Reviewer
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Date of documentation: Sept. 4, 2019
Last update: Feb. 6, 2020
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International