Desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum) and multipurpose trees established to increase productivity of grazing lands. (Daniel Danano)

Improved grazing land management (Ethiopia)

Gitosh masheshal

Description

Rehabilitation of communal grazing lands, through planting of improved grass and fodder trees and land subdivision, to improve fodder and consequently livestock production.

This case study focuses on the highly populated, humid highland regions of Ethiopia that experience serious shortages of pasture. Due to rapid population growth, communal grazing areas are increasingly being converted into cropland. This has led to enormous pressure on the little remaining grazing land, through overstocking of dairy cows and oxen, and thus overgrazing, resulting in considerably decreased productivity.
Improved grazing land management is vital to increase food security and alleviate poverty, as well as to bring environmental rewards. To address these problems, the national SWC programme in Ethiopia initiated a grazing land management project over a decade ago. Implementation of the technology includes the initial delineating of the grazing land, and then fencing to exclude open access. This is followed by land preparation, application of compost (and, if necessary, inorganic fertilizers) to improve soil fertility, then planting of improved local and exotic fodder species, including multipurpose shrubs/trees such as Leucaena sp. and Sesbania sp. and the local desho grass (Pennisetum sp.). Desho has a high nutritive value and regular cuts are ensured. It is planted by splits, which have high survival rates and establish better than grasses which are seeded. Other grass seeds, as well as legumes, including alfalfa (lucerne: Medicago sativa) and clovers in some cases, are mixed with fodder tree seeds and then broadcast.
Maintenance activities such as weeding, manuring and replanting ensure proper establishment and persistence. Fodder is cut and carried to stall-fed livestock. Once a year, grass is cut for hay, which is stored to feed animals during the dry season. Experience shows that such grazing land is best managed when individually owned and used. In the study area, the community has distributed small plots (<0.5 ha) of communal grazing land to individual users to develop, manage and use.
The overall purpose of the intervention is to improve the productivity of grazing land and control land degradation through the introduction of productive techniques and improved fodder species, which consequently improve livestock production. Commercialisation of animals and marketing of their products increases the income of farmers. The government provides technical assistance, close follow-up, and some inputs for initial establishment. Land users are trained in compost/ manure application, planting of seeds, splits and seedlings, and general maintenance.

Location

Location: Chencha, Ethiopia

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 37.6166, 6.2691

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation:

Type of introduction
Cut and carry of grass for stall-feeding from improved pasture. (Daniel Danano)
-

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Ja - Silvo-pastoralism

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: legumes and pulses - other, fodder crops - other, fodder crops - alfalfa, lucerne: Medicago sativa
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
  • Grazing land
    • Cut-and-carry/ zero grazing
    • Improved pastures
    Animal type: cattle - dairy, oxen

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
SLM group
  • area closure (stop use, support restoration)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • improved plant varieties/ animal breeds
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Splits of desho grass (Pennisetum pedecillatum) are plantet in lines, using a hand hoe, after good seedbed preparation. Spacing between grass splits is 10 x 10 cm. The white line is a boundary between two households' plots (width of plot: 15-20 m). Trees are planted at rirregular spacing (around 5 m apart), layout is not specified.

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, control of dispersed runoff, increase in soil fertility

Secondary technical functions: increase of infiltration, improvement of soil structure, control of concentrated runoff

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: animal manure, leaf litter, wood ash, soil

Scattered / dispersed
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs, G : grass

Trees/ shrubs species: Leucaena sp., Sesbania sp.

Grass species: Desho grass (Pennisetumsp.), alfalfa (lucerne: Medicago sativa)

Other type of management: change of intensity level
Author: Daniel Danano

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: n.a.
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. Delineation of the area to be conserved and establishment of a fence (Timing/ frequency: before the onset of rain)
  2. Subdivision of communal land into individual plots of 0.3–0.5 ha. (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Planting material preparation in nurseries: grass splits (desho) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Good seedbed preparation (Timing/ frequency: (at the onset of the rains).)
  5. Planting of grass splits and tree/shrub species in lines; sowing of grass (Timing/ frequency: (early in the rainy season).)
  6. Weeding. (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 320.0 320.0 100.0
Equipment
Animal traction ha 1.0 17.0 17.0 100.0
Tools ha 1.0 5.0 5.0 50.0
Plant material
Seedlings ha 1.0 5.0 5.0
Grass splits (tillers) ha 1.0 450.0 450.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer ha 1.0 60.0 60.0 100.0
Compost/manure ha 1.0 140.0 140.0 100.0
Construction material
Deadwood for fencing ha 1.0 55.0 55.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'052.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1'052.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Compost/manure preparation. Material used includes animal manure, (Timing/ frequency: / initial establishment)
  2. Compost application (Timing/ frequency: / one month after planting, initial establishment)
  3. Cut-and-carry, to stall-fed animals, begins when fodder is ready. (Timing/ frequency: (after 2–3 months growth) /2 -4 times)
  4. A final cut for hay is taken early in the dry season when the grass has matured well. (Timing/ frequency: (end of October) /)
  5. Weeding (Timing/ frequency: /each year.)
  6. Compost/manure application, mixed with soil, during seedbed preparation (only where plants have died and need replacement and fertilisation). (Timing/ frequency: None)
  7. Enrichment planting and gap filling (Timing/ frequency: after a year / repeated each year.)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Labour ha 1.0 35.0 35.0 100.0
Equipment
Tools ha 1.0 4.0 4.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds ha 1.0 30.0 30.0 100.0
Seedlings ha 1.0 2.0 2.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer ha 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
Compost/manure ha 1.0 35.0 35.0 100.0
Construction material
Deadwood for fencing ha 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 126.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 126.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Local term: wett dega
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

animal production
decreased
increased


Increase in livestock production

wood production
decreased
increased

product diversity
decreased
increased


Increase in the availability of livestock products on the market

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased


Decrease in size of grazing plots due to land fragmentation

farm income
decreased
increased


Selling animals and their products

workload
increased
decreased

Dependence on incentives
high
low


Initially high. Incentives such as free seeds, seedlings, tools

Socio-cultural impacts
health situation
worsened
improved


Improvement in household diets (milk)

community institutions
weakened
strengthened

national institutions
weakened
strengthened


Increased willingness

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

Biodiversity
decreased
increased

Soil fertility
decreased
increased

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
decreased

Sediment transport
improved
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Increased national income due to export of animals and their products.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Availability of fodder (grass, hay, shrubs) in sufficient quantities, and all year round

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Increase the area under such development.
  • Reduction in soil loss and land degradation

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Maintain adequate cover by planting more grass.
  • Introduction of high yielding species as well as increase in land productivity and livestock production

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? ntroduce bigger variability of quality
    species and improve maintenance activities such as weeding and cultivation.
  • Improved diet: livestock by-products such as milk, butter and cheese are
    essential food items required by the households

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Keep on increasing/improving quantity/quality of livestock feed.
  • Increased income through commercialisation and marketing of animals
    and their by-products. Meets financial needs for paying taxes, school fees, clothes etc.
  • Rehabilitation of communal grazing lands is both a technical and social challenge. Here is a promising example from Ethiopia that is spreading quickly. The key is subdivision of land into individual plots where cut-and-carry of grass and stall-feeding of livestock is practiced. This is only a possible option, however, where rainfall is favourable. land use rights: individual for cropland, open access (unorganised/communally used) for grazing land, except for the case study area where the rights to rehabilitated grazing land are given to individuals
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • At the initial stage of establishment it is very labour intensive Use of improved land preparation methods such as oxen ploughing.
  • Substantial cash for inputs, particularly seedlings, is required Produce seedlings of improved species and making compost in backyards.
  • Needs high fertilizer application Focus more on organic fertilizers.
  • High pressure on remaining grazing areas Keep animals in stall (stable) or park, at least part of the day and during the night, and introduce cut-and-carry more widely.

References

Compiler
  • Daniel Danano
Editors
Reviewer
  • Donia Mühlematter
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Fabian Ottiger
Date of documentation: Mei 29, 2011
Last update: Sept. 10, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Adane Dinku, Chencha Wereda, Natural Resources Management Annual Report,. 2001 and 2002.:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International