Gully plug (Mira Haddad)

Gully plug (Jordan)

السدات

Description

Gully plugs aim at rehabilitating active gullies in dryland watersheds, which are prone to erosion through concentrated surface runoff. Multiple gullies plugged in succession dissipate runoff energy, foster local water retention and infiltration, encourage sedimentation, assist in the stabilization of gully bed and side banks, and stimulate revegetation of flow paths; the channel measures must be combined with proper SLM in the catchments upstream.

Characteristics: Multiple gully plugs positioned sequentially within a gully system interrupt concentrated surface runoff and reduce its erosive power. The plugs are each made of multiple cobbles/stones mostly ranging between 10 and 30 cm diameter and constructed to ensure a stable structure. The plugs started at the head of the gully (upstream) and ranges from 1.5 - 3.7 m in width with an average of 2.5 m. For heavily eroded and very unstable sections, gabions can be used also. The structures are around 1.0 to 1.5-m high, anchored into the sidewalls, and around 0.20 to 0.35 m deep into the gully bed, built up to around 1/3 to max. 1/2 of the gully depth - ensuring the concentrated flow stays within the channel and does not overflow the side banks. The top of the plug is U-shaped, with the sides built higher than the centre. Upslope, the plugs are packed with soil to trap sediments (stopping it flowing through the structure), and downslope the plugs have an apron to dissipate the energy of overflowing water, into a micro stilling basin. The downslope side of the gully plug is sloped rather than vertical. The large stones add roughness to the slope, creating a rough spillway that dissipates erosive energy. In the direction of gully flow, several gully plugs are placed such that the upper gully apron is set at approximately the height of the following downstream gully crest.

Environment: The technology is used in a watershed close to Al Majeddyeh village, located in the Middle Badia zone, approximately 30 km south-east of Amman. The climate is arid and warm (Palmer, 2013). The average annual rainfall is around 130 mm. The natural environment is labelled as steppe, “BSh” in the köppen classification. The human environment is characterized by agropastoralists. They are semi-nomadic and live in villages around the watershed, for example, Al Majeddyeh village.

Purpose: The measure interrupts the concentrated flow, reduces velocity, and dissipates energy. Multiple structures along the gully decrease the erosive power of runoff, retaining a fraction of the runoff, inducing sedimentation (upstream of the plug), thus protecting the gully bed from further deep-scouring, and strengthening the gully side banks, especially when this is linked with re-vegetation. Over time, the establishing vegetation (roots and surface cover) stabilizes the soil and protects it from concentrated flow erosion. To be effective, gully plug emplacement requires SLM in upland areas. These measures then jointly mitigate peak runoff generation and accordingly reduce downstream flooding.

Major activities: Upland SLM is essential. In the specific watershed rehabilitation context, upland SLM was achieved through micro water harvesting and re-vegetation through native shrubs (the “VALLERANI” method). Gully morphology assessment is required for gully plug design, and positioning and earthwork excavation is necessary for foundation preparation in the gully bed and wall anchors. Proper layering of various size stones and shaping of gully plugs is necessary as is the addition of a packed soil pack upstream of the stone structure, to semi-seal the surface and to pond water. Then gully walls are revegetated through native seedlings: these benefit from the water ponding upstream prior to sedimentation upstream of the gully and enhanced soil water storage in the sediments once the gully is filled.

Benefits: Stops ongoing land degradation and gully deepening, and achieves a certain degree of rehabilitation; retains a fraction of runoff water and sediments in the watershed – water mainly infiltrates and provides moisture to the gully vegetation; gully vegetation serves various purposes including livestock fodder, reduction of flow velocities in the gully, and retention of further sediment.

Land user's opinion: Land users benefit from the vegetation (e.g. fruit trees can potentially be out-planted), as well as ponded water for livestock; however, the technology is labor-intensive, and therefore costly, and landowners (at the local target site) require incentives to carry out the work.

Location

Location: Amman governorate/Al Jizza/Al Majeddyeh village, Jordan

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 36.12826, 31.71933

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: Nee

Date of implementation: 2017

Type of introduction
Gully plug construction (Mira Haddad)
Gully plugs during the first rainy season 2017/2018. Photo looking downstream at the top of a gully plug with water ponded and sediment trapped upstream. (Mira Haddad)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Ja - Agro-pastoralism (incl. integrated crop-livestock)

  • Grazing land
    • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
  • Waterways, waterbodies, wetlands - Drainage lines, waterways
    Main products/ services: To convey and drain: Wd

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wg: gully erosion/ gullying, Wo: offsite degradation effects
  • physical soil deterioration - Pk: slaking and crusting, Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
  • water degradation - Hs: change in quantity of surface water, Hw: reduction of the buffering capacity of wetland areas
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • minimal soil disturbance
  • cross-slope measure
  • water harvesting; surface water management (spring, river, lakes, sea, riparian zone, riverbanks, seashore, lakeshore, spring shed); ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
  • structural measures - S6: Walls, barriers, palisades, fences
  • other measures - Specify tillage system: no tillage Specify residue management: grazed and retained

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Emplacement in gully morphological system and watershed context: Determine the downstream starting point for the gully plugs and then extend upstream. The basic design is to keep the structure height maximum half the gully depth regardless of structure type. The spacing between structures is set as a gully depth function, structure crest height above the gully bed, and slope of the gully bed between structures. Additionally, the structure's final location will be shifted either upstream or downstream of the calculated gully bed level to place the structure in a more stable point if required. Following this methodology ensures variable spacing between structures to cope with both slope and depth of gully to ensure the sediment filling in between these structures occurs. In the case of distinct gully morphology and side banks that are very unstable, gabion structures can also be used/instead of a single stone pack.

Design of the Structure: Gully plugs must be anchored strong enough to resist water flow and prevent bypass from the side banks. A foundation is also required for all structures, depending on their dimensions and the bed's nature. At the specific site, the foundation depth for the planned structures ranges between 0.2 to 0.35 meters. The anchoring of gully plugs ranges between 1 and 1.5 meters. This depends on the existing condition of the banks at each structure location. Gully plugs have a downstream apron with a length of around 3 to 4 times the height of structures. The apron starts from below the bottom level of the foundation and gradually level halfway down. All gully plugs were designed to have a height maximum of 0.5 the depth of the gully. So each structure will pass water flow downward but keeping it inside the gully. Gabion structures have a sort of spillway from the top but at the same time protecting the banks. The configuration slightly differs from the normal stone structure, but the idea is to protect the sides and a spillway in the middle. The upstream front of each gully plug has a side slope of 1:1, while the downstream front of the plug has a side slope of 2:1 (not counting the apron). The slopes at the two sides greatly increase the base width of the plug and improve their stability. The gully plugs are provided with an amount of soil resulting from the foundation to form a triangle of soil fill against the structure at the upstream side; this improves the function of the gully plugin holding more water and trapping sediments. On the other side of each structure, the downstream side's slope is meant to tackle the overflow of water along the drop to safely return to the gully bed level without causing additional erosion. The rock-filled apron catches the flow and acts to dissipate erosive energy.
Author: Steve Evett

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: Gully plug)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
The most distinct cost factor is labor – which is especially significant when using local (community) labor; some technical training is required.
Establishment activities
  1. Implement upland watershed SLM (reference VALLERANI) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Gully system/morphological assessment (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Determine plug design and implementation in the watershed (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Excavation earthworks for anchors and foundation (Timing/ frequency: At least 2 months prior rainy season onset)
  5. Stone made construction of gully plugs (occasionally with gabions) (Timing/ frequency: At least 1 month prior rainy season onset)
  6. Soil pack at upstream front (Timing/ frequency: At least 1 month prior rainy season onset)
  7. Revegetation of gully side banks (Timing/ frequency: At the onset of the rainy season)
Establishment inputs and costs (per Gully plug)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Field technician (design and oversight) Labour Day (LD) per structure 0.2 50.0 10.0
Workers (excavation/earthworks) LD 4.0 35.0 140.0
Workers (stone layering/construction) LD 4.0 35.0 140.0
Worker (out-planting of seedlings) LD 1.0 35.0 35.0
Equipment
Shovel, Pickaxe, buckets, ruler Lump sum 1.0 10.0 10.0
Plant material
Seedlings per item 10.0 0.5 5.0
Construction material
Stones m3 4.0 10.0 40.0
Other
Logistics (seedling transport, local stone transport) lump sum 1.0 10.0 10.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 390.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 390.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Inspect damage/status (Timing/ frequency: After severe storms and runoff events)
  2. Maintain/repair/improve (Timing/ frequency: After inspection)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per Gully plug)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Expert (investigation) LD 0.1 50.0 5.0
LD 0.5 35.0 17.5
LD 1.0 35.0 35.0
Construction material
stones m3 0.5 10.0 5.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 62.5
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 62.5

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 130.0
Jordan has a rainy season from September to May – but locally, the effective rainy season sets on later (November or December) and lasts until April.
Name of the meteorological station: Queen Alia international airport reference station reports long term average annual rainfall of about 150 mm A rainfall tipping bucket installed in the site in 2016.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

water availability for livestock
decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved


Some herbs (and fruits (trees) in the future)

recreational opportunities
reduced
improved


enhanced biodiversity, shade and shelter

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Through training/community participation

Ecological impacts
water quality
decreased
increased


Certain degree purification through infiltration in the sediment accumulation zone

harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved

surface runoff
increased
decreased


Effect on hydrology (distinctness of runoff peak)

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
recharge


Certain deep-infiltration

evaporation
increased
decreased


more open water ponding – but also deep-infiltration and beneficial use for vegetation (transpiration)

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased


Side banks stabilized

soil accumulation
decreased
increased


sediments trapped

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced


sediment crust increased in the ponding area – but better soil structure at the side banks (revegetation) – overall positive impact.

vegetation cover
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

animal diversity
decreased
increased

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased

flood impacts
increased
decreased

landslides/ debris flows
increased
decreased


Through side bank stabilization.

micro-climate
worsened
improved

Off-site impacts
downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
decreased


especially when combined with upland measure: reference VALLERANI

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
reduced


Less tributary channel development (connectivity of upland areas); less downstream siltation

damage on public/ private infrastructure
increased
reduced


less runoff peakiness and siltation

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

During the initial stage potential benefits through vegetation do not materialize; main effects are on water and sediment retention. Long-term, the technology fosters the rehabilitation nature-based retention functions (very limited long-term maintenance required).

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
flash flood

not well at all
very well
epidemic diseases

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
extended growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
1
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Gully side bank vegetation useable as (livestock) fodder source; some herbs (later fruit tree benefits) for human consumption.
  • Gully is stable and does not expand e.g. tributaries. Uplands remain connected and productive.
  • Ponded water for livestock watering (during the rainy season).
  • Shelter and shade through vegetation.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Sediments from the uplands are trapped; relatively fertile soil remains in the watershed.
  • Increased local soil moisture and consequential vegetation quantity and bio-diversity enhancement; increase carbon storage and other ecosystem services such as pollination.
  • Smoothened watershed hydrology is beneficial for downstream agriculture – especially when applied in a watershed context with downstream flood irrigation (MARAB)
  • Protection of downstream infrastructure (flooding and sediments).
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • implementation costs Incentives (e.g. governmental) for communities to implement SLM; regulations and enforcement on environmental management – especially connected with entitlements of natural resources facilitation
  • Tensions between upstream and downstream watershed users (watershed hydrology) – especially affected through wrong design and failure (e.g. gully breakage) Community-based and holistic watershed management – the share of benefits and commitment for maintenance.
  • Additional fodder supply might attract other foreign herders (overgrazing) Community-based and holistic watershed management – and protection.
  • Technical skills needed for implementation Rural communities’ capacity building programs
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Expert design and implementation support required Governmental and environmental organizations in control of design and support to local communities (training).
  • Requires upland SLM Integrated watershed management and empowerment of local communities to manage and facilitate – provision of support (e.g. government and/or international projects).
  • Increased vegetation in a fragile ecosystem can lead to local pressure Integrated watershed management and empowerment of local communities – especially sustainable grazing plans
  • Risk of wrong lessons learned: large water harvesting in gully systems (dams) created by locals Capacity development programs; regulations and enforcement on environmental management.

References

Compiler
  • Mira Haddad
Editors
Reviewer
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Date of documentation: Maart 9, 2021
Last update: Maart 29, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Steven, E. (2017). Report on Majiddya Watershed Rehabilitation Project - Gully Plugs Plan /August 2017.:
  • Strohmeier, S. (2017). Dimensioning of Marab in Majidyya.:
  • SEA. 1974. Les ouvrages en gabions – techniques rurales en Afrique. Secretariat d’Etat aux Affaires Etrangeres, Republique Francaise, 20, rue Monsieur, 75007 Paris.:
  • FAO. 1977. Guidelines for watershed management. FAO Conservation Guide 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, 1977:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International