Spekboom (Portulacaria afra) established in riplines to rehabilitate degraded areas in the Eastern Cape of South Africa (Japie Buckle)

Spekboom (Portulacaria afra) planting within riplines for thicket biome restoration (South Africa)

Spekboom planting on contours

Description

The restoration of the thicket biome in the Eastern Cape is assisted by planting ‘spekboom’ (elephant bush) (Portulacaria afra), an indigenous succulent plant within contour lines/riplines on degraded hillslopes. The increased vegetation cover reduces runoff and soil loss.

Due to severe land degradation over many decades of goat farming, the restoration of the so-called ‘thicket biome’ is taking place on a large scale in the Baviaanskloof Nature Reserve and Camdeboo National Park in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. The restoration projects have been introduced in parts of the thicket biome that receive 350 to 500 mm annual average rainfall. The main direct cause of degradation is overgrazing/browsing by goats (Boer and Angora) over the past 100 years. The overutilization of vegetation occurs mainly on valley bottoms and footslopes in mountainous areas where relatively fertile soils occur. This has resulted in large expanses of open vegetation canopy under which a high degree of runoff occurs - and subsequent soil loss leading to increased sediment loads in downstream drainage systems. The thicket biome vegetation (especially spekboom) is well known for its ability to sequester large amounts of carbon and therefore help towards mitigating climate change. The improved vegetation cover also contributes towards an increase in biodiversity, and therefore has a positive impact on tourism also. Establishment of spekboom in riplines can be used in combination with other technologies e.g. brush packing (laying cut bush on the soil surface), silt fences (low barriers across the slope) or fibre rolls. This technology can be employed in any similar semi-arid environment to restore degraded catchments - using locally appropriate plant species.
After identification of sites to be rehabilitated, this is followed by the identification of suitable sources of plant material for transplantation at the rehabilitation areas. In the case of the project in the Eastern Cape, spekboom cuttings of 30 to 50 cm in length were taken from existing stands, then left for one to two weeks in the sun to dry slightly before being transplanted in the rehabilitation sites. Care must be taken not to over-harvest healthy spekboom stands - not more than 30% should be removed.
Riplines need to be created along the contour by means of mechanisation or manual labour. Riplines should be between 3 and 10 meter apart - depending on the slope (closer on steep slopes) - 10 to 20 cm deep and just wide enough to plant the spekboom cuttings to a depth of at least 10 cm. Cuttings are planted between 15 to 20 cm apart within the ripline, so as to form a continuous barrier/sediment trap along the contour. The ripline promotes water infiltration into the rootzone of the cuttings. Cuttings need to be firmed-in with soil dug from the ripline. Watering the spekboom after planting is recommended – if possible. Brush packing (brush packing with thorny biomass to prevent grazing and provide a micro-climate for grass seed to germinate and establish) between riplines with local woody material (if available locally, and preferably thorny branches) is recommended to provide protection against grazing and to create a micro-climate for vegetation growth. In between riplines, silt fences or fibre rolls can be used to slow water runoff and to trap sediment. Maintenance includes the replanting of cuttings where mortality occurred.

Location

Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 24.59573, -32.29027
  • 24.02533, -33.57965

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2010; less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Established spekboom cuttings along riplines/contours (J Buckle)
Interplanting with spekboom cuttings between riplines. (J Buckle)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Grazing land
    • Wildlife in nature reserves
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying, Wo: offsite degradation effects
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Pk: slaking and crusting, Pi: soil sealing
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bh: loss of habitats, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
  • water degradation - Hs: change in quantity of surface water, Hg: change in groundwater/aquifer level, Hp: decline of surface water quality
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • water harvesting
  • surface water management (spring, river, lakes, sea)
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • structural measures - S6: Walls, barriers, palisades, fences

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Spekboom cuttings (30 - 50 cm in length and 1 to 3 cm diameter) are cut from existing stands. The riplines are created by labourer (soil on downhill side of line) on contours with the spacing between lines a function of the slope (3 metres apart on 10 - 15 degree slopes and 6 to 10 metres apart on 5 to 10 degree slopes). The cuttings are planted 15 to 20 cm apart in the riplines at a depth of around 10 cm.
Riplines 10cm deep – as long as the bare patches that need rehabilitation – labourers also use picks.
Author: J Buckle

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Rand
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 12.0 Rand
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 140
Most important factors affecting the costs
Soil hardness, labour cost and distance to rehabilitation site.
Establishment activities
  1. Creation of riplines (unskilled manual labour) (Timing/ frequency: during wet season)
  2. Collection of Spekboom cuttings (Timing/ frequency: during wet season)
  3. Transport of cuttings to planting site (Timing/ frequency: during wet season)
  4. Planting of cuttings in riplines (Timing/ frequency: during wet season)
  5. Watering of cuttings (Timing/ frequency: during wet season)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Rand) Total costs per input (Rand) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Unskilled labour (including transport) per day 20.0 240.0 4800.0 100.0
Equipment
Picks, spades, wheel barrow, bow saw and pruning shears (renting equipment) per day 20.0 20.0 400.0 100.0
Plant material
Planting material is free
Planting material is free
Other
Management (including transport) per day 2.0 600.0 1200.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 6'400.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 533.33
Maintenance activities
  1. Replant cuttings where mortality occurs (Timing/ frequency: 6 to 8 months after planting)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Rand) Total costs per input (Rand) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Replanting of cuttings (unskilled labour - including transport) per day 10.0 240.0 2400.0 100.0
Other
Management (including transport) per day 1.0 600.0 600.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 3'000.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 250.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 350.0
Summer thunderstorms
Harsh hot summers and very cold winters
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
  • Government conservation areas
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • Conservation areas
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • Conservation areas
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
x
increased

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
recreational opportunities
reduced
x
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

water quality
decreased
x
increased

harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
x
improved

surface runoff
increased
x
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
x
increased

flood impacts
increased
x
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased

micro-climate
worsened
x
improved

Off-site impacts
downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
x
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
x
decreased

impact of greenhouse gases
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local thunderstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local hailstorm

not well at all
x
very well
cold wave

not well at all
x
very well
flash flood

not well at all
x
very well
epidemic diseases

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
  • Improved planting techniques
Planting of cuttings with established roots from the mother plant and creation of small notches a the cutting to stimulate root growth.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • A long-term cost-effective technique to rehabilitate badly degraded thicket vegetation.
  • Creates temporary work for poor local communities.
  • Reduces sediment load in streams and rivers.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Spekboom sequesters large quantities of carbon and therefore contributes over the long term to climate change mitigation.
  • Downstream benefits on water quality.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Labour intensive - not viable if not subsidised by Government. Reduce manual labour - mechanise the creation of riplines.
  • Newly established spekboom stands vulnerable to browsing. Fence rehabilitated areas.
  • Newly established spekboom stands vulnerable to drought and frost. Timing of planting in wet/warm season
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome

References

Compiler
  • Dirk Pretorius
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Maximilian Knoll
  • Yacime Khadraoui
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: April 6, 2018
Last update: Nov. 2, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International