Strip-till (Thomas Ritter)

Strip-till (Germany)

Streifenbearbeitung

Description

Strip-till is a form of precision farming and conservation agriculture that combines minimum tillage in strips with no-till on the remainder of the field. The soil over the whole field is protected by a growing crop or mulch from sunlight, and especially from the direct impact of raindrops by providing permanent soil cover.

Conservation agriculture includes cultivation systems with minimum tillage or without tillage (no-till). Minimum tillage uses machinery (cultivators, rotary tillers) that only loosen the topsoil layer without turning it, leaving a mixture of bare soil and crop residues from the previous crop/ cover crop on the surface. No-till refers to sowing and fertilizing directly into the plant residues. Strip-till is a hybrid, where only the strip around the seed furrow is minimum-tilled, leaving up to two-thirds of the area under no-till.
Strip-till increases surface roughness, which slows the flow of surface water after heavy rains, improving infiltration rates and particle deposition, thus preventing soil erosion, nutrient losses and degradation of water quality in downstream channels and rivers. The plant residues reduce soil crust formation and decrease evaporation rates (Gangan et al. 2022). The residues also improve biological activity and the build-up of soil organic matter (SOM) and clay-humus complexes. The increased SOM content improves water storage capacity and thus water use efficiency throughout the growing season (Stadler, 2014; Busari et al. 2015).
Strip-till seeding is a precision farming technology that requires a high precision GPS guidance system and specific machinery, such as seed drills to cut through crop residues. The distance beween the strips depends on the cultivated crop. For maize cultivation it is typically 75cm. Strip-till machinery is often heavier than conventional seeding drills because the undisturbed soil is denser and harder. Often a new tractor with more horsepower is needed to compensate for the heavy weights. If mulch seeding is used, grain harvesters equipped with well-designed straw/chaff spreading devices across the full cutting width are required (Corsi & Muminjanov, 2019).
Strip-till also has negative side effects, which are related to the disadvantages of no-till: delayed soil warming, soil compaction, increased disease pressure, and increased weed pressure. Without ploughing, other measures such as selecting fast-growing and effective ground cover species, early high-density seeding, and/or using herbicides are needed to control weeds, especially in the transition period (first 2-3 years) when the seed bank in the soil is well-filled.
In our documented example, the farmer used strip-till on sandy soils (lacking nutrients, with poor water-holding capacity) and combined it with the application of organic fertilizer. Specifically the strip-till seeding of maize was chosen to make efficient use of digestate from a biogas plant. The digestate is applied in the tilled strips (seed bed) providing organic fertilizer for the whole growing season. A winter-killed catch crop was sown before drilling maize. The technology required expensive machinery and equipment, such as a Volmer Strip-Till Culex ML, RTK station and GPS guidance system. However, the costs were recouped through savings in fuel and fertilizer.

Location

Location: Uhsmannsdorf (Nieder Horka), Saxony, Germany

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 14.90753, 51.31698

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?: Nee

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Volmer liquid manure strip-till on mustard as cover crop - failure grain is already sprouting (Herr Ritter)
Volmer liquid manure strip-till on winter-killed cover crop mustard (Mona Pauer)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • To effectively incorporate biogas residues.
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Nee

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, cereals - rye, Winter-killed cover crop (e.g. mustard) before maize
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? Nee
    Is crop rotation practiced? Ja

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil, Ed: deflation and deposition
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Pk: slaking and crusting, Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bh: loss of habitats, Bl: loss of soil life
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification, Hs: change in quantity of surface water, Hp: decline of surface water quality
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • minimal soil disturbance
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment (A 3.2: Reduced tillage (> 30% soil cover)), A6: Residue management (A 6.4: retained)

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
*1: Direct seeding is quite similar to strip-till
Author: Schmidt et al. (2001)
The distance between the strips depends on the cultivated crop. For maize cultivation it is typically 75cm. For other row-crops (e.g. sugar beet) or rapeseed the distance between the tilled strips can be lower.
Author: Felix Witing

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation:
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.91 €
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 18.70€ per hour
Most important factors affecting the costs
If the work is done by a contracting company, the costs are 10-20% higher.
Establishment activities
  1. Equipment purchase (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Installation of precision farming technology (RTK station, GPS guidance system) (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (€) Total costs per input (€) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
GPS-guidance system GPS-guidance system 1.0 25000.0 25000.0 100.0
Volmer Strip-till Culex ML Vomer Strip-till Culex ML 1.0 25000.0 25000.0 100.0
RTK-station RTK-station 1.0 17500.0 17500.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 67'500.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 74'175.82
Maintenance activities
  1. Spreading biogas digestate (Timing/ frequency: March/April)
  2. Combined strip-till (Timing/ frequency: April/May)
  3. Weed bonitour (Timing/ frequency: June)
  4. Crop protection measure (Timing/ frequency: June)
  5. Silage (Timing/ frequency: September/October)
  6. Transport to biogas plant (Timing/ frequency: September/October)
Total maintenance costs (estimation)
-73.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 739.0
Name of the meteorological station: https://whh-kliwes.de/mapview
Length of growing period (LGP): 209
(https://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/dauer-der-vegetationsperiode-30631.html)
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: surface water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


Effective use of the organic fertilizer (biogas digestate) and improvement of soil quality (sandy soils).

crop quality
decreased
increased

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


Increased water holding capacity on the long term.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Can efficiently use organic fertilizer (biogas digestate).

farm income
decreased
increased


Increase due to savings of diesel and labor.

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

workload
increased
decreased


Fewer working operations.

Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
surface runoff
increased
decreased


Increased infiltration rates

soil moisture
decreased
increased


Improved soil moisture due to increased infiltration and less transpiration (improved soil cover)

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil compaction
increased
reduced

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased


Due to combination with winter-freezing cover crops.

drought impacts
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced


Reduced due to less surface runoff.

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced


Reduced due to less surface runoff and efficient application of fertilizers.

wind transported sediments
increased
reduced


Reduced due to improves soil cover.

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
Changing weather conditions increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
heatwave

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Economically beneficial.
  • Savings of operations in sowing and tillage.
  • Higher soil moisture, improved water-use-efficiency through the whole growing season.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Less erosion (less bare soil).
  • Higher water infiltration rates (more macro- and mesopores due to roots and improved biological activities).
  • Improved soil health and quality. Plant residues/cover crops increase biological activity, such as the presence of earthworms that digest plant residues into clay-humus-complexes, improving soil structure.
  • Greater planting time flexibility. The new crop can be sown as soon as the previous crop is harvested and weather conditions are suitable.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Component failure of the technology: it is quite susceptible to interference during data transmission. Thus, in Germany, for example, better grid development is needed.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Increased weed pressure. However, this often occurs only in the first few years. Planting of cover crops can suppress weeds.
  • Increased disease pressure. Can be overcome by diverse crop rotation without direct repetitions (e.g. wheat-wheat, or maize-maize). Grinding of residues for faster decomposition.
  • Delayed soil warming- Adjustment can include underfoot fertilization as well as injection fertilization.

References

Compiler
  • Felix Witing
Editors
  • Michael Strauch
  • Mona Pauer
Reviewer
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Date of documentation: Mei 2, 2022
Last update: Aug. 14, 2023
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Corsi, S. and Muminjanov, H. (2019): Conservation Agriculture: Training guide for extension agents and farmers in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Rome, FAO.: https://www.fao.org/sustainable-agricultural-mechanization/resources/publications/details/ar/c/1195731/
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International