Double legume cropping consisting of lentils (yellow rows) intercropped with chickpeas (green rows) (Mina Devkota)

Diversified Cropping System: Relay Intercropping of Lentils with Chickpeas (Morocco)

Description

A Diversified Cropping System (DCS) results in a more resilient and productive cropping system. In this case, chickpeas were introduced as a relay intercrop between established lines of lentils. This not only had no negative effect on lentil yields, but also enabled the harvest of an extra crop: chickpeas.

In the semi-arid regions of Morocco, agricultural production varies from year to year, but yields are generally declining because of climate change. Climate change is leading to more irregular rainfall and frequent extreme weather events. Wherever possible, there is a need to intensify agricultural systems to ensure food security while simultaneously increasing resilience.
Cultivating lentils (Lens culinaris) as a sole crop is common practice in rural Morocco. To intensify this cropping system, the International Centre for Agricultural Research Dry Areas (ICARDA) introduced chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) as a relay intercrop into the common lentil production system. Because chickpeas are planted within an already growing crop of lentils, this form of intercropping is termed "relay planting". Importantly, chickpeas do not affect the yields of lentils (0.837 + 0.19 t ha-1 yield in sole vs. 0.808 + 0.159 t ha-1 in intercrop) because they do not significantly compete for water and nutrients. With two crops harvested from the same piece of land, overall farm profits increase. Furthermore, this creates a more resilient production system because the farmer is not dependent on a single crop. Additionally, including chickpeas as a relay-intercrop extends the cropping season and prolongs the period where the soil is covered, consequently protecting it from degradation. An added advantage is that both chickpeas and lentils are leguminous, nitrogen-fixing crops that can improve soil fertility. Also, both crops have high cultural and culinary value locally. However, the technology has potential drawbacks as in years of extreme droughts, chickpeas require supplementary irrigation, especially during establishment. This is often unavailable to local farmers and may result in poor crop establishment and low yields.
In 2020-2022, ICARDA tested this Diversified Cropping System (DCS) on a trial field of half a hectare, in an area with average annual precipitation of 390 mm (based on 40 years of data). The system is implemented as follows. First, the field is prepared by ploughing. In December, lentils are mechanically seeded. Two rows of lentils are planted 15 cm apart. The spacing between each two-row pair is roughly 90 cm. Compound fertilizer is applied during seeding. In January, an herbicide is sprayed to control grassy weeds. The field is mechanically weeded twice, in mid-January and then again in February. Chickpeas are sown at the end of February also in paired lines (two rows 20 cm apart) also with compound fertilizer. Each pair of chickpea lines is planted between pairs of lentils. In March, the plots are manually weeded, and in April, the lentils are manually harvested and mechanically threshed. A single spray of insecticide is applied in April-May. Finally, in June, the chickpeas are mechanically harvested and have an average yield of 1.1 + 0.146 t ha-1.
This documentation illustrates an ICARDA innovation that is accessible since there are no establishment events and costs. This Diversified Cropping System improves a traditional system by introducing an additional crop, resulting in higher farm income and resilience to variable weather.

Location

Location: Merchouch, Khémisset Province, Morocco

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -6.69021, 33.5607

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: Nee

Date of implementation: 2021

Type of introduction
Lentils established and chickpeas seeded as a relay crop (Mina Devkota)
Moroccan farmer holding a chickpea plant (Mina Devkota)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Nee

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: legumes and pulses - lentils, chickpeas
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? Ja
    Is crop rotation practiced? Nee

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level, M4: Major change in timing of activities

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The symbols correspond to the following technical specifications:

A: Spacing between a row of lentil and a row of chickpea= 35 centimetres
B: Spacing between two rows of lentil in the same pair = 15 centimetres
C: Spacing between two rows of chickpea in the same pair = 20 centimetres
D: Spacing between two rows of lentil bordering a pair of chickpea= 90 - 95 centimetres
Author: Fatma Rekik

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 Hectare)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Moroccan Dirham
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 10.63 Moroccan Dirham
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 75
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
n.a.
Maintenance activities
  1. Field Ploughing (Timing/ frequency: Prior to seeding)
  2. Lentil Seeding (Timing/ frequency: December)
  3. Fertilizer Application (Lentil) (Timing/ frequency: During seeding)
  4. Herbicide Application (Lentil) (Timing/ frequency: January)
  5. First Mechanical Weeding (Lentil) (Timing/ frequency: Mid January)
  6. Second Mechanical Weeding (Lentil) (Timing/ frequency: Mid February)
  7. Chickpea Seeding (Timing/ frequency: End of February)
  8. Fertilizer Application (Chickpea) (Timing/ frequency: During seeding)
  9. Fungicide Application (Lentil) (Timing/ frequency: February-March)
  10. Manual Weeding (Chickpea) (Timing/ frequency: March)
  11. Lentil Harvesting (Timing/ frequency: April)
  12. Insecticide Application (Chickpea) (Timing/ frequency: April-May)
  13. Chickpea Harvesting (Timing/ frequency: June)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 Hectare)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Moroccan Dirham) Total costs per input (Moroccan Dirham) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Weeding (Lentil) Person-Days 10.0 75.0 750.0 100.0
Weeding (Chickpea) Person-Days 10.0 75.0 750.0 100.0
Lentil Harvesting Person-Days 10.0 75.0 750.0 100.0
Equipment
Plough Machine-Hours 3.0 150.0 450.0 100.0
Lentil Seeder Machine-Hours 1.0 150.0 150.0 100.0
Chickpea Seeder Machine-Hours 1.0 200.0 200.0 100.0
Sprayer Machine-Hours 3.0 60.0 180.0 100.0
Weeder Machine-Hours 2.0 100.0 200.0 100.0
Lentil Thresher Machine-Hours 2.0 150.0 300.0 100.0
Chickpea harvester Machine-Hours 2.5 300.0 750.0 100.0
Plant material
Lentil seeds Kilogram 45.0 8.0 360.0 100.0
Chickpea seeds Kilogram 80.0 15.0 1200.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Herbicide (for Lentil) Litre 1.0 170.0 170.0 100.0
Insecticide (for Chickpea) Litre 0.25 300.0 75.0 100.0
Fungicide (for Lentil) Litre 0.5 150.0 75.0 100.0
NPK 10:20:20 (for Lentil) Kilogram 100.0 3.0 300.0 100.0
NPK 10:20:20 (for Chickpea) Kilogram 100.0 3.0 300.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 6'960.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 654.75

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 390.0
typical Mediterranean climate with winter rains
Name of the meteorological station: INRA + ICARDA weather data
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: ground water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased


Overall crop production increased due to the introduction of an additional crop: chickpeas. No yield reduction was observed in lentils as a sole crop.

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


Due to the introduction of an additional crop: chickpeas, the risk to complete crop failure was reduced since if one crop fails another exists. This increases resilience.
If rainfall is evenly distributed throughout the growing season, farmers will get good harvests for both crops.
If rainfall occurs in the early season and the late season is dry, farmers will get good lentil harvests but not chickpeas.
Alternatively, if rainfall occurs in the late season with severe drought in the early season, farmers may get complete crop failure of lentils but a good harvest of chickpeas.

product diversity
decreased
increased


Through the introduction of an additional crop: chickpeas, the overall system was diversified.

land management
hindered
simplified


The introduction of additional crops increased the complexity of the system and its management. For example, planting in the standing lentil needs specialized machinery.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Additional planting material, labor and inputs are required for this cropping system. It may also require supplementary irrigation in the case of late-season drought occurrence.

farm income
decreased
increased


Two crop harvests (both grains and straw) instead of one increases farm income.

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased


Two harvests of different crops: chickpeas and lentils instead of one diversified farming income streams. This system also allows employment opportunities outside of the main crop growing period.

workload
increased
decreased


The introduction of an additional crop complexifies the management and therefore increases the workload.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved


Having two crops, especially protein-rich legumes promoted food and nutrition security.

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


Soil coverage for longer times due to the introduction of a second crop later in the season highlights its role in reversing land degradation

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
increased


There was no significant difference in soil moisture between sole lentils and intercropped lentils (with chickpeas) at the time of lentil harvesting.

soil cover
reduced
improved


Having a second crop later in the season extends the period in which the soil is covered.

soil loss
increased
decreased


Soil coverage mediated by the second crop reduces soil loss due to erosion.

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased


Both crops are leguminous meaning that they contribute to the supply of nitrogen to the soil.

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
Season: winter
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
epidemic diseases

not well at all
very well
insect/ worm infestation

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Diversified farm income
  • Reduces fallow period which helps to improve soil quality
  • Reduced risk of complete crop failure
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Improved resilience due to diversified crops
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Competition for resources (nutrients, water, etc.) between the two crops. Providing supplementary irrigation/ fertilization.
  • Increased complexity and more labour demands of the system The use of machinery and implementing a seasonal farming plan to distribute the farming tasks throughout the season.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The overall system's higher susceptibility to legume-inflicting pests and diseases Using adequate pest control/ integrated pest management techniques

References

Compiler
  • Fatma Rekik
Editors
  • Joren Verbist
Reviewer
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Date of documentation: Sept. 5, 2022
Last update: Okt. 12, 2022
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International