Rice growing in the Rice – Legume (lentil) production system at the demonstration site of ICARDA in Odisha (Reena Mehra)

Legumes in rice-based cropping systems (India)

Description

In India, 29 percent of the area cropped with rice remains fallow during the dry "rabi" season. This offers the opportunity to improve farm income and soil health by introducing legumes especially lentils. Diversifying the cropping system in such a way results in higher farm income due to additional crop produce and reduced carbon and water footprints.

In India, monsoon-season “kharif” rice is usually grown between June and November, while in the dry winter “rabi” season (from November to February), farmers keep these lands fallow due to lack of irrigation. Another constraint is a suitable crop with available seed for such a short window. Given the World Health Organization’s recommended pulse (legume grain) consumption of 50 g per capita per day, Odisha state needs to produce more. Here, legumes are grown on approximately 2.1 million hectares and total pulse production is 1.06 million tonnes. This results in an annual deficit of 0.22 million tonnes of pulses and a per capita per day consumption of only 11-23 grams. Odisha is exploring the vast potential for fallow cultivation of legumes.
The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) recognised this challenge and tested the introduction of lentils during the fallow rabi period. This resulted in a diversified cropping system as demonstrated in the following case study from the interior of Odisha, which is hilly with a cool winter season. Rice is the most commonly cultivated crop. The climate (1000-1500 mm of annual rainfall) and loamy-silty soil is suitable for lentils (Lens culinaris) - especially short duration varieties that can grow residual moisture of the rice.
During the 2018-2021 seasons, the lentil-rice cropping system was demonstrated on 165 ha of farmers’ fields involving 1920 farmers. The average yield of lentils was 790 kg/ha which generates traditional net-farm income of around 200 USD/hectare. Lentils have proved to have good potential: rice yields are not reduced and hence, from a cost-benefits perspective, it is a very viable option. Therefore, the state government is now promoting lentils as a fallow crop in rice-based systems in hilly areas with a cool winter season.
Lentil cultivation is as follows. Firstly, lentils are seeded (40 kg/ha) in the second week of November at a spacing of 30 x 5 cm. 3.5 kilogram of biocides (fungicides, herbicides, and pesticides) per ha are required and 50 kilogram of NPK fertilizer per ha is applied. Manual weeding takes around 20 person-days per ha. The lentils are harvested in February, requiring around 15 person-days per ha. Family labour provides for just over half of the field operations and a quarter of the harvest.
To conclude, growing lentils in the fallow period of rice-based cropping systems offers an opportunity to formulate a more climate resilient cropping system that improves soil health and farm income. This also has positive impact on health due to the inclusion of more pulses in the diet.
Data presented is from the bilateral project on pulses development funded by the Department of Agriculture & Farmers Empowerment, Government of Odisha with financial support from RKVY during 2018-2021 and implemented in collaboration with ICARDA. The work acknowledges the contribution of all scientists and team members in the ICARDA India programme: in the field and at headquarters.

Location

Location: Odisha, India

No. of Technology sites analysed: 10-100 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 85.09982, 20.95265

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?: Nee

Date of implementation: 2018

Type of introduction
Farmer in an ICARDA demonstration field that is full of lentils (Reena Mehra)
A farmer applying biocides to lentils (Reena Mehra)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Nee

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - rice (wetland), legumes and pulses - lentils
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
    Is intercropping practiced? Nee
    Is crop rotation practiced? Ja
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • improved plant varieties/ animal breeds
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A5: Seed management, improved varieties, A6: Residue management

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Lentil:
The plant to plant distance within a row (A) = 10 centimeters
The row to row distance (B) = 30 centimeters
Author: Reena Mehra
Rice:
The plant to plant distance within a row (A) = 15 centimeters
The row to row distance (B) = 15 centimeters
Author: Reena Mehra

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 hectare of lentil cultivation)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Indian rupee
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 80.0 Indian rupee
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
n.a.
Maintenance activities
  1. Lentil: Seeding (Timing/ frequency: Second week November)
  2. Lentil: Fungicide (Timing/ frequency: First week January)
  3. Lentil: Herbicide (Timing/ frequency: Second week December)
  4. Lentil: Fertilizer (Timing/ frequency: January)
  5. Lentil: Weeding (Timing/ frequency: None)
  6. Lentil: Harvest (Timing/ frequency: February)
  7. Rice: Seeding (Timing/ frequency: First week of June)
  8. Rice: Irrigation (Timing/ frequency: June)
  9. Rice: Fertilizer 1 (Timing/ frequency: Directly after seeding)
  10. Rice: Fertilizer 2 (Timing/ frequency: 15 days after seeding)
  11. Rice: Fertilizer 3 (Timing/ frequency: 90 days after seeding)
  12. Rice: Weeding (Timing/ frequency: None)
  13. Rice: Harvest (Timing/ frequency: November)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 hectare of lentil cultivation)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Indian rupee) Total costs per input (Indian rupee) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Lentil: Weeding Person-hour 20.0 300.0 6000.0
Lentil: Harvest Person-hour 15.0 300.0 4500.0
Rice: Weeding Person-hour 6.0 300.0 1800.0
Rice: Harvest Person-hour 15.0 300.0 4500.0
Equipment
Lentil: Zero-Seeder Machine-hour 2.5 1200.0 3000.0
Lentil: Sprayer Machine-hour 1.0 300.0 300.0
Rice: Tractor for land preparation Machine-hour 1.0 1200.0 1200.0
Rice: Tractor for transplantation Machine-hour 5.0 1200.0 6000.0
Plant material
Lentil: Seed Kilogram 45.0 105.0 4725.0
Rice: Seed Kilogram 25.0 30.0 750.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Lentil: Fungicide Kilogram 0.5 600.0 300.0
Lentil: Herbicide Liter 1.5 367.0 550.5
Lentil: NPK-fertilizer Kilogram 0.5 150.0 75.0
Rice: Gromor (first application) Kilogram 5.0 40.0 200.0
Rice: DAP (first application) Kilogram 100.0 35.0 3500.0
Rice: Potash (2:1 -> first and third application) Kilogram 90.0 40.0 3600.0
Rice: Urea (2:1 -> second and third application) Kilogram 90.0 10.0 900.0
Other
Rice: Irrigation after seeding Liter 3.0 100.0 300.0
Rice: Irrigation in maturity (if needed) Liter 10.0 100.0 1000.0
Rice: Transplantation Person-hour 19.0 300.0 5700.0
Rice: Fertilizer Person-hour 6.0 300.0 1800.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 50'700.5
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 633.76

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to: ground water
Is salinity a problem?
  • Ja
  • Nee

Occurrence of flooding
  • Ja
  • Nee
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


Due to an additional crop

crop quality
decreased
x
increased

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased


Additional crops reduces overall failure

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

land management
hindered
x
simplified


The additional crop requires additional management

demand for irrigation water
increased
x
decreased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased


the additional inputs for lentil imply extra expenses

farm income
decreased
x
increased


lentil harvest increase overall farm income

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased


cultivation lentils requires more workload

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

health situation
worsened
x
improved


pulses are recommended for a healthy diet

Ecological impacts
soil cover
reduced
x
improved


lentils provide prolonged soil cover

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased


legumes fix nitrogen in the soil

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
x
increased


lentils use the residual water, preventing it from going to the groundwater

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Ja
  • Nee
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Increased farm income and cropping intensity
  • Improved soil health due to crop rotation
  • Better utilization of residual moisture
  • Cultivation of new pulse crop
  • Improved resilience
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Improved resilience due to diversified crops
  • Reduces fallow period which help to improve soil quality
  • Improved diet that includes more pulses
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Lentils might require too long growing period More research in short duration lentils
  • Long duration rice makes it difficult to cultivate lentil variety on the correct time Experimenting with new rice varieties or alternative systems
  • Increased farmer workload The additional income justifies this
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Farmers have to learn this new cultivation method Investing in farm demonstrations and capacity building

References

Compiler
  • Joren Verbist
Editors
Reviewer
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Date of documentation: Nov. 10, 2022
Last update: Feb. 22, 2023
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
  • Nigamananda Swain, Ashutosh Sarker. (1/8/2021). Variety, Technology and Seed System Development for Pulses in Odisha Project Completion Report. Beirut, Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/67880
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International