Farmer comparing uncleaned and cleaned seed (Udo Rudiger)

Small-Scale Seed Cleaning Unit (Tunisia)

Description

The mobile seed cleaning machine improves the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Tunisia by significantly enhancing seed quality, increasing crop production, reducing workload and costs, and promoting local value chains and social cohesion.

In Tunisia and Algeria, the agricultural system is characterized by low levels of mechanization, particularly among small and medium-sized farmers who cannot afford expensive imported machines. As a result, a substantial amount of manual labour is required to carry out various agricultural operations, such as seed cleaning, which is traditionally done by women and children. While seed production is often done by large suppliers, this does not always satisfy the demand. Therefore, many smallholder farmers in Tunisia prefer to use their own seeds, despite the time-consuming manual cleaning process and the risk of lower quality.
To address these issues, the International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) collaborated with national partners to develop a mobile seed cleaning machine for small-scale farmers. The prototype, designed and tested with input from a local manufacturer, is suitable for the primary field crops (such as wheat, barley, vetch, and faba beans) in Tunisia. The machine sort out damaged or small seeds and rock or pebbles, while treating the remaining seeds by removing contamination or weeds, to ensuring quality and longer shelf-life.
The mobile seed cleaning machine, with a capacity of approximately 800 kilograms per hour depending on the seed type, was distributed to four farmer cooperatives, serving a total of 1,000 small-scale farmers. In order to promote ownership, the farmers contributed to a portion of the costs and received training on how to operate the machine effectively.
When using the mobile seed cleaning machine, farmers have the option to choose between two methods: solely cleaning the seeds or cleaning and treating them. The cost for cleaning alone is around 2 Tunisian Dinar per 100 kilograms, while the cost for both cleaning and treating, which includes the application of a fungicide, is 8 Tunisian Dinar per 100 kilograms. Life time is estimated between 5 and 10 years and worn out parts can easily be replaced.
The introduction of the mobile seed cleaning machine has several advantages, including a decrease in workload for women and children, improved production and quality of crops, higher productivity of the land, reduced dependence on imported seeds and machinery, and the promotion of local value chains and social cohesion through cooperative ownership and utilization of the machines.
However, there are still some challenges to overcome. For example, the initial prototype required heavy bags of seeds to be lifted to a height of two meters, leading to additional labour requirements and reduced efficiency. This challenge was addressed by equipping the machine with a conveyor screw, which can double its capacity at an additional cost. Additionally, the cost of purchasing the machine can be a significant investment for farmers, but this can be overcome through collective buying and organizing themselves in cooperatives.
In conclusion, the mobile seed cleaning machine represents an innovative solution that improves the (local) value chain and livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Tunisia by reducing workload and costs, particularly for women and children. This technology has the potential to be scaled up and benefit other regions and cooperatives.

ICARDA’s work on Small-Scale Seed Cleaning Unit is supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock, the IFAD-Funded CLCA Project, the GIZ SWC@Scale project as part of the ProSol global program, and the CGIAR initiative on Agroecology in Collaboration with National Partners in Tunisia and Algeria (OEP-Tunisia, IRESA-Tunisia, INRAT Tunisia, ITGC-Algeria, GIZ Tunisie, DGACTA-Tunisie)

Location

Location: Tunisia

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 9.53931, 33.88913
  • 4.0585, 34.86198

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: Nee

Date of implementation: 2019

Type of introduction
A woman cleaning seed using a traditional method (Udo Rudiger)
Farmers using and inspecting the seed cleaning machine (Udo Rudiger)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Nee

  • Grazing land
    • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
    • Cut-and-carry/ zero grazing
    Is integrated crop-livestock management practiced? Ja
    Products and services: meat, milk
      SpeciesCount
      sheepn.a.
      goatsn.a.

    Water supply
    • rainfed
    • mixed rainfed-irrigated
    • full irrigation

    Purpose related to land degradation
    • prevent land degradation
    • reduce land degradation
    • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
    • adapt to land degradation
    • not applicable
    Degradation addressed
    SLM group
    • energy efficiency technologies
    • post-harvest measures
    SLM measures
    • agronomic measures - A5: Seed management, improved varieties
    • structural measures - S10: Energy saving measures
    • management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level

    Technical drawing

    Technical specifications
    The seed cleaning machine has the following dimensions:
    -Length = 180cm
    -Width = 80cm
    -Height = 175cm.

    Equipped with a high-quality sieve measuring 140cm in length and 65cm in width, the seed cleaning machine ensures that even the smallest impurities are removed from the seeds. With a hopper capacity of 200kg, the machine can accommodate large batches of seeds, allowing for uninterrupted cleaning.

    The machine has a cleaning capacity of around 600 till 1000kg/h.

    Its lifetime is estimated to be between 5 and 10 years. Worn-out parts are easily replaceable and locally available.

    Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

    Calculation of inputs and costs
    • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: 100 kilogram cleaned and treated seed)
    • Currency used for cost calculation: Tunisian Dinar
    • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3.0 Tunisian Dinar
    • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 25
    Most important factors affecting the costs
    The costs of purchasing the machine is substantial. However, this should be shared among farmers within the cooperation.
    Establishment activities
    n.a.
    Establishment inputs and costs (per 100 kilogram cleaned and treated seed)
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tunisian Dinar) Total costs per input (Tunisian Dinar) % of costs borne by land users
    Equipment
    Seed cleaning machine with conveyor screw 1.0 12500.0 12500.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology 12'500.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 4'166.67
    Maintenance activities
    n.a.
    Maintenance inputs and costs (per 100 kilogram cleaned and treated seed)
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tunisian Dinar) Total costs per input (Tunisian Dinar) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Operating person-hour 0.1 10.0 1.0
    Equipment
    Electricity kWh 3.0 0.066 0.2
    Plant material
    Uncleaned seed kilogram 100.0
    Fertilizers and biocides
    Fungicide (for treating) litre 0.2 30.0 6.0
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 7.2
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 2.4

    Natural environment

    Average annual rainfall
    • < 250 mm
    • 251-500 mm
    • 501-750 mm
    • 751-1,000 mm
    • 1,001-1,500 mm
    • 1,501-2,000 mm
    • 2,001-3,000 mm
    • 3,001-4,000 mm
    • > 4,000 mm
    Agro-climatic zone
    • humid
    • sub-humid
    • semi-arid
    • arid
    Specifications on climate
    n.a.
    Slope
    • flat (0-2%)
    • gentle (3-5%)
    • moderate (6-10%)
    • rolling (11-15%)
    • hilly (16-30%)
    • steep (31-60%)
    • very steep (>60%)
    Landforms
    • plateau/plains
    • ridges
    • mountain slopes
    • hill slopes
    • footslopes
    • valley floors
    Altitude
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    Technology is applied in
    • convex situations
    • concave situations
    • not relevant
    Soil depth
    • very shallow (0-20 cm)
    • shallow (21-50 cm)
    • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
    • deep (81-120 cm)
    • very deep (> 120 cm)
    Soil texture (topsoil)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Topsoil organic matter content
    • high (>3%)
    • medium (1-3%)
    • low (<1%)
    Groundwater table
    • on surface
    • < 5 m
    • 5-50 m
    • > 50 m
    Availability of surface water
    • excess
    • good
    • medium
    • poor/ none
    Water quality (untreated)
    • good drinking water
    • poor drinking water (treatment required)
    • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
    • unusable
    Water quality refers to:
    Is salinity a problem?
    • Ja
    • Nee

    Occurrence of flooding
    • Ja
    • Nee
    Species diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low
    Habitat diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low

    Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

    Market orientation
    • subsistence (self-supply)
    • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
    • commercial/ market
    Off-farm income
    • less than 10% of all income
    • 10-50% of all income
    • > 50% of all income
    Relative level of wealth
    • very poor
    • poor
    • average
    • rich
    • very rich
    Level of mechanization
    • manual work
    • animal traction
    • mechanized/ motorized
    Sedentary or nomadic
    • Sedentary
    • Semi-nomadic
    • Nomadic
    Individuals or groups
    • individual/ household
    • groups/ community
    • cooperative
    • employee (company, government)
    Gender
    • women
    • men
    Age
    • children
    • youth
    • middle-aged
    • elderly
    Area used per household
    • < 0.5 ha
    • 0.5-1 ha
    • 1-2 ha
    • 2-5 ha
    • 5-15 ha
    • 15-50 ha
    • 50-100 ha
    • 100-500 ha
    • 500-1,000 ha
    • 1,000-10,000 ha
    • > 10,000 ha
    Scale
    • small-scale
    • medium-scale
    • large-scale
    Land ownership
    • state
    • company
    • communal/ village
    • group
    • individual, not titled
    • individual, titled
    Land use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Water use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Access to services and infrastructure
    health

    poor
    good
    education

    poor
    good
    technical assistance

    poor
    good
    employment (e.g. off-farm)

    poor
    good
    markets

    poor
    good
    energy

    poor
    good
    roads and transport

    poor
    good
    drinking water and sanitation

    poor
    good
    financial services

    poor
    good

    Impacts

    Socio-economic impacts
    farm income
    decreased
    increased


    Is improved due to better yields and no/less costs on purchased seeds

    diversity of income sources
    decreased
    increased


    Cleaned seeds could be sold

    workload
    increased
    decreased


    Mechanically cleaning substituted the manual cleaning (often done by women and children)

    Socio-cultural impacts
    food security/ self-sufficiency
    reduced
    improved

    situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
    worsened
    improved

    Ecological impacts
    Off-site impacts
    Dependency on seed distributors
    Increased
    Reduced

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Benefits compared with establishment costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Benefits compared with maintenance costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Climate change

    Climate-related extremes (disasters)
    epidemic diseases

    not well at all
    very well

    Adoption and adaptation

    Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
    • single cases/ experimental
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
    • Ja
    • Nee
    To which changing conditions?
    • climatic change/ extremes
    • changing markets
    • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

    Conclusions and lessons learnt

    Strengths: land user's view
    • Substantially reduced in workload.
    • Decreased costs, and decreased dependency on the seed market
    • Improved seed quality
    Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
    • Improved gender equality because women and children mostly did the seed cleaning.
    • The unit is mobile hence many farmers can use it.
    • The seed cleaner unit and produced seeds improve the value chain on a local level
    • The seed cleaner unit is used within a farmer organization, hence it improves the cohesion within this organization.
    • Using cleaned seeds increased the productivity of the land.
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
    • Entering uncleaned seeds (bags usually weigh between 30 and 50 kilograms) into the machine, which is a lift around 2 meters, is too difficult for one person so additional labour is required. The newer machines have a conveyor screw, to transport seeds from the ground to the entry. It is estimated that this will double the capacity.
    • Investment is required Organizing in cooperations so costs can shared
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome

    References

    Compiler
    • Joren Verbist
    Editors
    Reviewer
    • William Critchley
    • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
    Date of documentation: Maart 2, 2023
    Last update: Sept. 13, 2023
    Resource persons
    Full description in the WOCAT database
    Linked SLM data
    Documentation was faciliated by
    Institution Project
    Key references
    • Rudiger, U., Zaiem, A., Idoudi, Z., Frija, A., Rekik, M. and Taher, A. 2021. Mobile seed cleaning and treatment unit improves forage seed quality and quantity and presents a successful business model for farmer cooperatives. Business Model Brief. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/116748
    • Aymen, F., Idoudi, Z., Rudiger, U. and Rekik, M. 2020. Collaboration between ICARDA projects and linkages to IFAD investment portfolio for enhancing seeds quality and forage production through entrepreneurship and farmers associations. Some examples from ICARDA activities in Tunisia. Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA): https://repo.mel.cgiar.org/handle/20.500.11766/11134
    • Rudiger, U. 2020. Report on small mobile seed treatment units for cooperatives in Tunisia: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12323
    • Udo Rudiger. (15/12/2020). Workshop with beneficiaries.: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12556
    • Frija, A., et al. 2022. Soil Protection and Rehabilitation of Degraded Soil for Food Security – ProSol: Towards the Effective Scaling of Soil and Water Conservation Technologies under Different Agroecosystems in North and Central West Tunisia – SWC@Scale/ProSol: Technical Progress Report/ January – August 2022. Beirut, Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA): https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/67835
    • Idoudi, Z. 2020. Encouraging Entrepreneurship with Mobile Grinders and Seed Cleaning Machines: https://www.icarda.org/media/blog/encouraging-entrepreneurship-mobile-grinders-and-seed-cleaning-machines
    • Idoudi, Z., Najjar, D., Rekik, M., Frija, A. 2022. Integrating Gender in the Use of Conservation Agriculture for Crop and Livestock System (CLCA). Beirut, Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA): https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/67126
    • Rekik, M., Frija, A., Idoudi, Z. 2022. Overview of CLCA Main Achievements in NA and LAC Countries. Beirut, Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA): https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/68177
    • Rudiger, U., Zaiem, A., Idoudi, Z., Frija, A., Rekik, M. and Taher, A. 2021. Mobile seed cleaning and treatment unit improves forage seed quality and quantity and presents a successful business model for farmer cooperatives. Business Model Brief. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/116748
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International