Soil testing lab established by the Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) in Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India (Santosh Gupta)

Dissemination of Soil Test Results to Farmers through a Participatory Approach (India)

Mitti ki namuna

Description

A systematic approach has been developed under the project for collecting soil samples, conducting the soil test results, issuing soil health cards, building the capacity of farmers to interpret the soil health card and apply the required nutrients to the soil based on the soil test result

Soil testing is a pre-cultivation activity that gives a good idea about soil structure and mineral composition ratios. The essential nutrients required for various crop growths can be estimated during soil testing. The Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) has established a state-of-the-art soil testing laboratory for testing soil samples in India's Mandla District of Madhya Pradesh. The soil test lab was established in 2016 with a capacity to test 1500-2000 soil samples every year. Based on a soil sampling process, it takes around 2 days to generate the soil test results for 20 soil samples. Collected soil samples are tested for 12 parameters. These parameters include Soil Ph, Soil organic carbon (SoC), electrical conductivity (EC), major nutrients like nitrogen(N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), secondary nutrients like sulphur, magnesium, iron, boron, zinc, manganese, and copper. Based on the soil test report, farmers are issued a soil health card with crop-specific recommendations for additional chemical and organic inputs into the soil.

To ensure the accuracy of the sampling process and proper dissemination of generated results among the farmers, FES has developed a very systematic process which consists of:

•the collection of soil samples
•the analysis of collected soil samples in an FES lab
•the issuance of soil health cards
•the interpretation of soil test results
•noticing of test results to farmers
•farmers are able to implement practices, recommended by the test result

The entire process, from soil sampling to dissemination, is briefly mentioned below:

•Developing the grids for a random collection of soil samples: The first step is to develop a geographical grid for collecting random samples based on predefined parameters. In the irrigated areas, samples are drawn in a grid of 2.5 ha, while in rainfed areas, samples are drawn from a grid of 10 ha. While developing the grid, farmers' fields are categorized into the following parameters. Each of the parameters is assigned a specific score, and based on the obtained score, each farmer’s land is given a specific number for easy identification on soil maps. These include the a) type of soil, b) type of field, e.g., upland, medium land, or low land, c) crop cycle (Single crop, multiple crops) d) The slope of the field. This entire exercise is a soil survey exercise used to develop soil maps for each geographical unit village, block, district.
•Collection of soil samples: From each classified grid, soil samples are collected from 5 different locations between the harvest of one crop and the sowing/planting of another crop when fields are vacant. The soil samples are collected at a depth of 5 to 15 cm. All the collected soil samples are mixed repeatedly, and a portion of the collected soil is kept aside each time. The mixing process is followed 5-6 times to ensure collected soil samples represent the entire area. Finally, around 500 gm of soil is packed in plastic polythene based on the above grid parameters.
•Soil sample analysis: Collected soil samples are transported to the centralized soil test lab in Mandla (MP) for testing and analysis. The samples are analyzed by qualified lab personnel. The analysis process for the above mentioned 12 parameters takes around 2 days (considering 8-9 working hours in a day).
•Issuance of soil health card: Based on the results obtained from the analysis, soil health cards are issued to farmers. The soil health card contains the following information in the local language (Hindi) so that farmers understand the test results and their implications:

a.Basic details of the farmer: name, address, soil grid, GPS coordinates, field identification number, etc.
b.Soil test results for above mentioned 12 parameters: results of the soil test in their respective units, standard numbers, grading of the obtained result (acidic/saline for PH., high, medium, low for other parameters)
c.Crop-wise soil correction recommendations for major crops: recommendations for synthetic fertilizers, biofertilizers, and compost
d.Pre-printed information with photos for identification of nutrient deficiency in the crops.

•Dissemination of soil health card to farmers: To ensure that farmers understand the results and implement the practices at their field, local community resource persons reach out to every farmer to make them understand the soil test results and closely monitor their farmers’ practices across the crop stages. Farmers are also encouraged to maintain farm diaries for their practices. They are also trained in the preparation of various bio-inputs and compost for application in their field.

Location

Location: Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 80.37213, 22.59756
  • 80.37213, 22.59756

Initiation date: 2018

Year of termination: n.a.

Type of Approach
Sample of the soil health card (Santosh Gupta)
Soil health card with recommendations (Santosh Gupta)

Approach aims and enabling environment

Main aims / objectives of the approach
1. Ensure judicious usage of fertilizers and micronutrients based on the requirement of the soil
2. Ensure quality soil testing and dissemination of results
3. Build farmers' capacity for interpretation of soil health cards
4. Develop soil maps based on the in-house results from the soil test lab
Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Institutional setting: The entire dissemination methodology is done through community-based organizations
  • Collaboration/ coordination of actors: Several stakeholders, such as FES, farmers, equipment suppliers, the scientific community, and soil scientists, are involved in the project
  • Policies: Soil test results are an excellent input for the agricultural policies around fertilizers, farming practices, and soil health-related policies
  • Land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement): A soil health card is an excellent tool for farmers to decide on the usage of fertilizers and the kind of farming practices to implement
  • Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Soil health cards inform the farmers and the project management team so to decide on required interventions and farming practices
  • Markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices: Very much relevant as soil test results quantify the number of farm inputs to be applied to the farm
Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach

Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
What stakeholders / implementing bodies were involved in the Approach? Specify stakeholders Describe roles of stakeholders
local land users/ local communities Farmers from the project area Soil samples were collected from the field of farmers. They have actively participated in the projects for managing the soil samples, participating in the capacity building programs, and implementing the recommended practices.
community-based organizations FES, the implementing NGO, have formed the Villages Environment Committee (VEC) in their project villages as community-based organizations VECs facilitated the implanting of a project by mobilizing the communities as and when needed. FES reached farmers through the VECs, to collect the soil samples or disseminate the information. VECs also facilitated community-level implementation activities.
SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers SLM Specialist Documentation of the activities
NGO Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) is a well-known NGO registered in India. It focuses on ecology-related issues and works closely with farmers and forest-based communities. FES played an essential role in the project. Primary activities were as follows: 1. Establishment of soil testing laboratory and hiring the technical team to conduct the soil test lab 2. Collection of soil test samples and building the capacity of farmers on soil sample collection 3. Conducting soil test results and issuance of soil health cards to farmers 4. Developing a soil health map for the project areas 5. Capacity building of farmers for the interpretation of soil health cards and ensuring the implementation of recommended practices
international organization GIZ, India Funding of the project
Lead agency
Foundation for Ecological Security
Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
none
passive
external support
interactive
self-mobilization
initiation/ motivation
x
The FES led the initiation of discussions with its donor organizations. Discussions with communities to understand the challenges and opportunities.
planning
x
Local community institutions played a significant role in the entire process of planning and execution
implementation
x
Farmers and community-based institutions were actively involved in implementing multiple activities under the project, such as collecting soil samples, supplying them to the soil test labs, and Implementing the recommended practices.
monitoring/ evaluation
x
Community-based institutions played an important role in monitoring individual farmers for implementing the recommendations provided to farmers. They also monitored the results regarding crop progress, crop productivity, and improvement in soil health status.
Flow chart

Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology

Decisions were taken by

  • land users alone (self-initiative)
  • mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
  • mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users
  • SLM specialists alone
  • politicians/ leaders

Decisions were made based on

  • evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)
  • research findings
  • personal experience and opinions (undocumented)

Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

The following activities or services have been part of the approach
Capacity building/ training
Training was provided to the following stakeholders
  • land users
  • field staff/ advisers
Form of training
  • on-the-job
  • farmer-to-farmer
  • demonstration areas
  • public meetings
  • courses
Subjects covered

1. Importance of soil testing for the judicious use of fertilizers
2. Methods for soil sample collection
3. Interpretation of soil health card
4. Dissemination of soil test results and ways and means for implementing the recommended practices following organic and non-organic implementation practices

Advisory service
Advisory service was provided
  • on land users' fields
  • at permanent centres
FES has a team of community-based resource persons from the local community and villages to provide advisory services to farmers
Institution strengthening
Institutions have been strengthened / established
  • no
  • yes, a little
  • yes, moderately
  • yes, greatly
at the following level
  • local
  • regional
  • national
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.
Village-level environment committees were formed to discuss the issues related to environmental concerns, livelihoods, and other social problems at the village level. These committees consist of male and female members representing the entire village.
Type of support
  • financial
  • capacity building/ training
  • equipment
Further details
These committees were provided financial support to implement the identified activities based on the provision under the project and proposals submitted by the local committees. FES regularly provides training and handholding support to these committees.
Monitoring and evaluation
The soil health report card is very useful in monitoring of the status of soil health and measuring the impact of various practices and intervention
Research
Research treated the following topics
  • sociology
  • economics / marketing
  • ecology
  • technology

Financing and external material support

Annual budget in USD for the SLM component
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.a.
Externally funded projects (GIZ)
The following services or incentives have been provided to land users
  • Financial/ material support provided to land users
  • Subsidies for specific inputs
  • Credit
  • Other incentives or instruments
partly financed
fully financed
equipment: machinery

Different equipment used for testing the soils

x
equipment: machinery: tools

Different tools are used for collecting soil samples and for soil testing

x

Labour by land users was

Impact analysis and concluding statements

Impacts of the Approach
No
Yes, little
Yes, moderately
Yes, greatly
Did the Approach enable evidence-based decision-making?

Soil health card-based changes in soil management and developing the evidence for soil health monitoring

x
Did the Approach improve coordination and cost-effective implementation of SLM?

Reduced the cost of applying fertilizers and other inputs through a result-based application

x
Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM?

Training and handholding by the team of implementing partners have helped land users to interpret the result of soil health card, collection of soil samples and following the recommended practices

x
Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of other stakeholders?

Other stakeholders such as implementing team got information about the outcome of their practices. More importantly, the soil health card was helpful in providing precise information on the application of fertilisers and bio-inputs.

x
Did the Approach encourage young people/ the next generation of land users to engage in SLM?

Youths were greatly involved in collection of soil samples

x
Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what hat been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?

Yes. The benefit in both reduced cost and improved soil health are the triggers to sustaining the practices. Also, the involvement of local community institutions will also ensure the sustainability of interventions.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Judicious use of fertilizers and pesticides based on the nutrient requirement of soil, as mentioned under the soil health report
  • Separate recommendations for both chemical and organic (bio-inputs) are a good way for land users to make informed decisions
  • Tracing the improvement in soil health status based on the land users' agricultural practices
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Developing the soil maps for the entire area to design appropriate interventions for the project
  • Instead of general recommendations for input application, the soil health card helped develop farmer/village-centric extension services for the farmers
  • Understand the impact of various interventions through periodic soil testing to document what has worked and what has not. Even this evidence can be used to monitor the soil organic carbon content for designing carbon-based projects and/or to access national or international carbon reduction credits.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Farmers are still unaware of the soil test facility and its benefits Regular awareness programs along with a demonstration of soil sample collection
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Farmers' strong belief in the application of a certain quantity of fertilizers to ensure better production This requires specific behavior change campaigns through local demonstration and documentation
  • Government authorities also conduct the soil test and issue the soil health card. However the farmers' experience with such system has not been outstanding. Put efforts into conveying the difference between both approaches by promptly issuing the soil health card
  • The soil test lab is in the District capital, so farmers in far-away areas may face difficulties in accessing the facility Explore the option of establishing soil test labs near farmers' locations

References

Compiler
  • Santosh Gupta
Editors
  • Noel Templer
  • Stephanie Katsir
  • Tabitha Nekesa
  • Ahmadou Gaye
  • Siagbé Golli
Reviewer
  • Udo Höggel
  • Joana Eichenberger
  • Sally Bunning
Date of documentation: Maart 18, 2023
Last update: April 11, 2024
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International