Practical work with community regarding plantation techniques for reforestation (Mohammad Aslam Hasand)

Community based reforestation initiatives to restore degraded forest and rangeland (Afghanistan)

د ټولنې پر مټ د بيا رغنيز نوښت له لارې د تخريب شوي ځنګل او څړځای رغول

Description

Community-driven reforestation initiative that involves awareness-raising, capacity building, feasibility analysis, and collaboration among various stakeholders to address land degradation and promote sustainable forest and rangeland management

The main aim of this approach is to contribute to ecosystem restoration, biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration through community awareness-raising, consultation and capacity building, feasibility analysis, site selection as well as resources mobilization for reforestation initiatives in Khost, Afghanistan.

This community driven initiative emerged, bringing together land users, forest and rangeland management associations, environmental experts, specialists and policymakers from various departments like Provincial Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock, National Environment Projection Agency, District Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock to heal the land, restore the forests, and rebuild the connection between people and nature.

The first step was to understand the root causes of degradation, followed by a detailed assessment to identify areas most in need of intervention. Priority was given to barren land stripped by erosion, degraded forests areas, and nutrient-depleted soils. The community incorporated traditional ecological knowledge shared by local elders, who recalled periods when the valley supported dense vegetation and thriving ecosystems. This was combined with modern ecological practices to develop a comprehensive restoration plan that balanced traditional knowledge with scientific innovation. The approach ensures awareness raising of the rural community, and knowledge and information enhancement on restoration of degraded forest and rangeland through reforestation initiatives in Khost, Afghanistan.

Specific objectives of the approach are:
1. To enhance the knowledge and awareness of rural communities in Khost, Afghanistan on restoring degraded forests and rangelands, including through public awareness, campaigns, community mobilization, consultations, and feasibility assessments, and mobilizing resources.
2. Involve key stakeholders actively in restoration, including Provincial Agriculture Irrigation and Livestock (PAIL), Provincial National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA), District Agriculture Irrigation and Livestock department (DAIL), Forest and Rangeland Management Association (FM/RM Association).
3. To enhance the capacity of Forest and Rangeland Management Association (FM/RM Associations) and local communities for effective restoration of degraded forests and rangelands through reforestation initiatives in Khost, Afghanistan.
4. To restore degraded forests and rangelands by enhancing knowledge, skills, and resources for sustainable management. This includes empowering the FM/RM Associations by improving its members’ understanding, skills, capacity, and active participation in conservation and restoration efforts.
5. To restore habitat for strengthening biodiversity conservation.

Location

Location: Sapari forest, Sabari district, Khost, Afghanistan, Khost, Afghanistan

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 69.8514, 33.50293

Initiation date: 2023

Year of termination: 2026

Type of Approach
Public awareness and community mobilization – engaging local communities, tribal elders, and stakeholders in decision-making, social participation, consultation and facilitation for implementation of the project (Mohammad Aslam Hasand)
Capacity building – training communities on sustainable practices and policy enforcement (Mohammad Aslam Hasand)

Approach aims and enabling environment

Main aims / objectives of the approach
To enhance the capacity of FM/RM Associations and local communities for adopting the technology on restoration of degraded forests and rangelands through reforestation initiatives in Khost.

-To restore habitat for strengthening biodiversity conservation.
-To promote the conversion of unproductive lands to productive lands.
-To empower local communities to replicate and scale up similar initiatives.
Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Social gathering, social participation for sapling plantation, information sharing among community members.
  • Availability/ access to financial resources and services: There is availability and access to financial resource and services, because all the financial support is directly transferred to community.
  • Institutional setting: FM/RM Associations are established to improve forest and rangeland management.
  • Collaboration/ coordination of actors: Other projects are collaborating with FM/RM Associations due to their status as a legal entity
  • Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: Community members have access to SLM knowledge through awareness raising, training and workshops offered
  • Workload, availability of manpower: Workload of FM/RM Associations during plantation campaign, protection and general management.
Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): The legal framework for land tenure and land and water use rights exists; they are, however, not properly implemented.

Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
What stakeholders / implementing bodies were involved in the Approach? Specify stakeholders Describe roles of stakeholders
local land users/ local communities Local community and farmers Land users, local community members: Mobilizations, awareness, social participation as well as self-contribution.
community-based organizations Forest and Rangeland Management Associations (FM/RM Associations) FM/RM Associations: decision making, awareness, mobilization, capacity building and social structure for self and in kind contribution.
SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers FAO specialist Technical assistance
private sector Construction company Construction, mechanical work and installation of system in including facilitation
local government Provincial Agriculture and Livestock (PAIL), District Agriculture Irrigation and Livestock (DAIL), National Environment Protection Agency (NEPA) Facilitation for the implementation of project
international organization FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Implementation of the GEF-funded project and technical assistance
Lead agency
UNFAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)
Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
none
passive
external support
interactive
self-mobilization
initiation/ motivation
x
FM/RM Association: mobilization, awareness raising and general management through social participation.
planning
x
FM/RM Association: jointly with community by developing of Community Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM) plan.
implementation
x
FM/RM Association: jointly with community provided labour, facilitation, coordination and consultation as well as supporting all the activities during implementation period as self and community in kind contribution.
monitoring/ evaluation
x
FM/RM Association: members are key stakeholders of the participatory monitoring and evaluation process.
Flow chart

"The Restoration of Degraded Forest and Rangeland Approach" focuses on reviving degraded forest, rangeland and generally ecosystems through sustainable reforestation initiatives. This approach involves: Identifying degraded areas and developing restoration initiatives, involving local communities in decision-making and capacity-building, planting native species, improving soil health, and adopting sustainable land management techniques, regularly assessing progress, addressing challenges, and ensuring long-term sustainability.
This integrated approach helps restore forest and rangeland, biodiversity, improve water retention, prevent soil erosion, and enhance local livelihoods.

Acronyms and Key Concepts:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Provincial Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (PAIL)
District Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (DAIL)
Forest and Rangeland Management Association (FM/RM Association)
Service providers are referred to different construction and logistics’ companies and contractors.

Author: Mohammad Aslam Hasand
Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology

Decisions were taken by

  • land users alone (self-initiative)
  • mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
  • mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users
  • SLM specialists alone
  • politicians/ leaders

Decisions were made based on

  • evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)
  • research findings
  • personal experience and opinions (undocumented)

Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

The following activities or services have been part of the approach
Capacity building/ training
Training was provided to the following stakeholders
  • land users
  • field staff/ advisers
Form of training
  • on-the-job
  • farmer-to-farmer
  • demonstration areas
  • public meetings
  • courses
Subjects covered

SLM/SFM practices, awareness, mobilization, quarantine, rotational grazing, biodiversity conservation, climate change, CBNRM plan, participatory moinotoring, operation of the system and general management of natural resources.

Advisory service
Advisory service was provided
  • on land users' fields
  • at permanent centres
Operating the irrigation system, sapling transplantation, quarantine, rotational grazing and general management.
Institution strengthening
Institutions have been strengthened / established
  • no
  • yes, a little
  • yes, moderately
  • yes, greatly
at the following level
  • local
  • regional
  • national
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.
FM/RM Association
Type of support
  • financial
  • capacity building/ training
  • equipment
Further details
Signed LoA for implementation and cost contribution, on site awareness raising, social mobilization, holding gathering and workshops and provided construction materials and tools for nursery establishment.
Monitoring and evaluation
FM/RM Association has the responsibility to perform monitoring of all activities in Sapari forest of Sabari district of Khost province.

Financing and external material support

Annual budget in USD for the SLM component
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.a.
Financial support is provided by the FAO-GEF project and in-kind contributions are from the community. In-kind contribution covers providing physical space or facilities to support the project, coordination, consultation and general facilitation, and human resources for restoration, patrolling, quarantine, and other community relevant activities. Hence, 80 percent of the financial support is provided by the FAO-GEF project and 20 percent by the community (as in-kind support).
The following services or incentives have been provided to land users
  • Financial/ material support provided to land users
  • Subsidies for specific inputs
  • Credit
  • Other incentives or instruments
Financial/ material support provided to land users
Technical support and livelihood packages including solar cooker, chopper machine, dairy toolkit, walnut cracker, construction material for reservoirs (cement, sand, stone, pipes), material for nursery establishment and saplings were provided.
Other incentives or instruments

Training workshops and other capacity building programmes, field day tour, social gathering as well as site visits by communities.

Impact analysis and concluding statements

Impacts of the Approach
No
Yes, little
Yes, moderately
Yes, greatly
Did the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation?

Capacity building, empowering of Forest and rangeland management associations (FM/RM Associations)

x
Did the Approach enable evidence-based decision-making?

Monitoring and participatory assessment skills were improved under the approach allowing to assess results and impacts and collecting evidence for decision-making

x
Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?

Consultation meetings, workshops, training, on job practical work and capacity building for better implementation of the technology.

x
Did the Approach improve coordination and cost-effective implementation of SLM?

FM/RM Associations and local community contribution, particularly providing of labour during plantation campaigns, protection and maintenance.

x
Did the Approach mobilize/ improve access to financial resources for SLM implementation?

Financial resources accessed according to the terms specified in the LoA.

x
Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM?

FAO technical staff conducted various trainings, workshop as well as awareness raising session regarding improving of land users’ capacity for better implementation of the SLM.

x
Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of other stakeholders?

Local governmental institutions like provicial and district Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (PAIL/DAIL) departements,FM/RM Associations and local community knowledge has been improved on SLM/SFM.

x
Did the Approach build/ strengthen institutions, collaboration between stakeholders?

Collaboration among FM/RM Associations, local community, governmental institutions and other stakeholders has been strengthened.

x
Did the Approach mitigate conflicts?

FM/RM Associations and local community facilitated implementation of the project on communal land as well as mitigated all sort of conflicts regarding protection, quarantine, rotational grazing and other sections.

x
Did the Approach improve gender equality and empower women and girls?

Women were actively involved in all project activities; some livelihood programs have been targeted at women and girls.

x
Did the Approach encourage young people/ the next generation of land users to engage in SLM?

Through awareness raising, workshop, training, farmer field schools, brochures and other visibility materials encouraged young people or next generation to engage in SLM.

x
Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters?

Improved water harvesting, controlled land degradation, planted saplings, prevented flood splash and water erosion which improved land users’ resilience to climatic changes/extremes and disaster.

x
Did the Approach lead to employment, income opportunities?

Short employment created for local community.

x
Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what hat been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?

Land users can sustain these efforts because their capacity has been strengthened, they have a sense of local ownership, and adaptive tribal management systems are in place, ensuring the long-term benefits of restoration for future generations.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Awareness, consciousness and knowledge on natural resources management of communities enhanced through workshops and trainings.
  • Increased availability of natural resources for better livelihoods of communities.
  • With increased community contribution, local efforts will support the protection and sustainable management of resources even after external support ends.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • This approach revives ecosystems by reintroducing native plant and animal species, supporting increased biodiversity and creating habitats for wildlife.
  • This approach improves ecosystem resilience, supports sustainable livelihoods, and promotes climate change adaptation. Restoration ensures long-term sustainability while addressing environmental, economic, and cultural needs.
  • The established FM/RM Associations have become the recognized legal bodies for managing forests, rangelands, and other natural resources. They will be responsible for ensuring sustainability and long-term protection after the project.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • FM/RM Associations established, but they need to be better organized and recognized. The Ministry of Agriculture Irrigation and Livestock of Afghanistan may connect and empower these local institutions.
  • Some components of the project were intended for women’s participation; however, due to government restrictions on women's employment, this remains a sensitive issue and can be considered a limitation in project implementation. Government should consider mainstreaming gender in such projects where gender is a key aspect.
  • This approach has been implemented in faraway forests with little management personnel to enforce law on the ground; unless communities manage these lands well, protection of natural resources could get weak. Community should take more responsibility for protecting natural resources.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • This approach often requires significant initial investment in terms of funding, materials, labor, and technical expertise. This includes costs for site preparation, planting, irrigation, and ongoing maintenance, which can be limiting for many communities. Adequate budget and community contribution can overcome or reduce this weakness.
  • This approach can take many years, even decades, to show significant ecological improvements, which can lead to frustration, reduced enthusiasm, or a loss of community and donor support. Strong mobilization and raising of the ownership sense in the community can overcome this weakness.
  • If local communities are not adequately involved, they may not feel a sense of ownership or responsibility for the project, leading to poor long-term maintenance and protection of the restored areas. This should be a community-based project, ensuring that, after donor support ends, the community takes responsibility for its ongoing maintenance and sustainability.
  • Insecure land tenure and unclear property rights can lead to conflicts over land use and limit the ability of communities to manage and protect restored areas. Solving conflict over property rights must be facilitated by the communities themselves; government agencies can empower them on conflict resolution.

References

Compiler
  • Mohammad Aslam Hasand
Editors
  • Megha bajaj
  • Afghanistan Safi
  • Mohammad Arif
Reviewer
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Illias Animon
  • Muhammad Ishaq Safi
Date of documentation: Jan. 12, 2025
Last update: Mei 7, 2025
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International