This is an outdated, inactive version of this case. Go to the current version.
Technologies
Inactive

Выращивание картофеля в лунке [Tajikistan]

technologies_1038 - Tajikistan

Completeness: 73%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Youth Ecological Center, Tajikistan (Youth Ecological Center, Tajikistan) - Tajikistan
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
NCCR North-South (NCCR North-South) - Kyrgyzstan

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

03/05/2011

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Ja

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

Технология выращивание картошки в лунке

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

Это технология используется для получения продукции в зонах дефицита воды и экстремальных условиях. Технология очень проста: капают яму размером 50 х 50 х50 см. на дно ямы засыпают компост или обогащенную почву, и сажают одну или две семенные картошки. По мере роста ботва закапывается, полив осуществляется регулярно.

Purpose of the Technology: Цель технологии: улучшение производства картофеля, и тем самым, повышение дохода фермера в таких климатических условиях. Технология показывает хорошие адаптационные возможности в засушливых районах. Метод улучшает доступ к воде.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Технология очень простая и не требует больших затрат. Основным вкладом для фермеров является приготовление компоста и покупка высококачественных семян. Физическая работа требуется для приготовления ямы и для дальнейшего ухода за картофелем.

Natural / human environment: Данная технология может быть внедрена, как и в дехканских фермах, так и в приусадебных участках

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Tajikistan

Region/ State/ Province:

Таджикистан

Further specification of location:

Хатлонский район, Н.Хусравский район

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • improve production

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

Cropland

  • Annual cropping
Comments:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Основная проблема связана с оптимальным использованием земли

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • full irrigation
Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 2
Specify:

Longest growing period in days: 150

Longest growing period from month to month: январь- май

Second longest growing period in days: 180

Second longest growing period from month to month: июнь- ноябрь

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • irrigation management (incl. water supply, drainage)

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
  • < 0.1 km2 (10 ha)
Comments:

Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 1га m2.

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

agronomic measures

agronomic measures

  • A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
Comments:

Main measures: agronomic measures

Type of agronomic measures: ранняя посадка, сменное возделывание культур, мульчирование, навоз / компост / остатки, борозды (дренаж, ирригация)

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

chemical soil deterioration

chemical soil deterioration

  • Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
physical soil deterioration

physical soil deterioration

  • Pk: slaking and crusting
  • Pi: soil sealing
Comments:

Main type of degradation addressed: Ха (Cn): снижение плодородия почвы и органических веществ в почве (не вызванные эрозией), Фк (Pk): уплотнение и образование коры

Main causes of degradation: управление с/х культурами (однолетние, многолетние, деревья/кустарники), землепользование

Secondary causes of degradation: управление землеи, изменение температуры, изменение сезонных дождей, засуха, бедность / богатство

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
Comments:

Main goals: prevention of land degradation, mitigation / reduction of land degradation

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

Author:

Каландаров Р., г.Душанбе. ул.Герцина 3.

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

Схема показывает нижнею часть ямы заполняемую компостом и почвой по мера роста побегов Постепенно до поверхности лунка засыпается обогащенной почвой.

Location: Юг Таджикистана. Н.Хусравский Район, Хатлонская область

Date: 11.05.2011

Technical knowledge required for land users: средний

Main technical functions: улучшение поверхностной структуры (покрытие коркой, уплотнение)

Relay cropping
Material/ species: семена картошки
Remarks: лункавания

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: компост

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify currency used for cost calculations:
  • US Dollars
other/ national currency (specify):

450

4.4 Establishment activities

Activity Type of measure Timing
1. None Structural

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour None None 1.0 8.0 8.0 100.0
Equipment None None 1.0 5.0 5.0 100.0
Plant material None None 200.0 0.45 90.0 1.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 103.0

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Type of measure Timing/ frequency
1. копка ям Agronomic человек ден
2. заполнения лунки почвой человек/день

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour None None 0.1 5.0 0.5 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 0.5

4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

основной фактор - копка лунки

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • arid

Thermal climate class: subtropics

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • low (<1%)

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

< 5 m

Availability of surface water:

medium

Water quality (untreated):

good drinking water

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • medium

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation of production system:
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
  • 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
  • animal traction
Gender:
  • women
  • men
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users

Population density: 10-50 persons/km2

Annual population growth: 0.5% - 1%

Market orientation of production system: subsistence (self-supply), subsistence (self-supply), mixed (subsistence/ commercial

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • medium-scale

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • state
Water use rights:
  • open access (unorganized)

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
markets:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
energy:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
roads and transport:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
drinking water and sanitation:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
financial services:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased
Water availability and quality

demand for irrigation water

increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts

food security/ self-sufficiency

reduced
improved

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

surface runoff

increased
decreased
Climate and disaster risk reduction

drought impacts

increased
decreased

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Gradual climate change

Gradual climate change
Season Type of climatic change/ extreme How does the Technology cope with it?
annual temperature increase well

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Meteorological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
local rainstorm not known
local windstorm well
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
drought well
Hydrological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
general (river) flood not well

Other climate-related consequences

Other climate-related consequences
How does the Technology cope with it?
reduced growing period not known

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

very positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

very positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

Comments:

15% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

50 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

Comments on spontaneous adoption: Технология постепенно улучшается и развивается

Comments on adoption trend: Постепенное внедрение

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Технология новая

How can they be sustained / enhanced? по мере возможности
при выращивании в лунках урожайность повышается

How can they be sustained / enhanced? при соблюдении агротехники можно получить хороший урожай
водосберегательная технология

How can they be sustained / enhanced? полив воды производиться индивидуально
технологию можно использовать даже на небольших земельных участках (на приусадебных участках)

How can they be sustained / enhanced? при использовании этой технологии, можно обеспечить картофелем одну семью

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
все что указано выше
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
технология применима только на малых участках

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules