Banana manure pits and mulching [Rwanda]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Desire Kagabo
- Editor: –
- Reviewer: David Streiff
Gusasira no gutera urutoki mu myobo irimo ifumbire mborera
technologies_1160 - Rwanda
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
The Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera River Basin (GEF-FAO / Kagera TAMP )Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Rwanda Agriculture Board (Rwanda Agriculture Board) - RwandaName of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Italy1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
22/01/2014
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Ja
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Banana planted in a regularly spaced manured pits and in combination with grass and banana mulch application to enhance soil fertility and moisture and improve crop production.
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
Banana is planted in a manure pit and the soil surface is carefully covered by banana or grass mulch. The manured pit is 0.6m deep and 2.0-2.0m wide. During establishment activities pits are filled with a mixture of soil and organic manure. Attention should be made when adding the mixed soil to the pits as a radius of 20 cm starting from the center of the pit where the banana is planted must not be filled with the mixture but filled merely with soil.This will assure that banana roots grow deeper in search for the nutrients. Recommended parallel and perpendicular spacing between the banana planting pits is 5m.
Purpose of the Technology: Banana manured pits and mulch application is a combination of an agronomic and structural technique. This method allows nutrients to be concentrated around the roots zone and keeps longer the available soil water content and controls the soil erosion.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The banana manure pits and mulching provides easy crop management options. The high demand of water and nutrients by banana can be easily met to maximize the fruiting potential. To achieve this potential, farmers are required to maintain a minimum of 3 plants per pit, one mature (grand) banana plant fruiting, a second half grown (mother), and one sucker (child) growing in the same pit. Every four months a farmer is expected to harvest a bunch of banana of around 80 kg per pit.
Natural / human environment: The constituted layer of mulch prevents rainwater from eroding the top soil, improves soil organic carbon, provides shade to plant roots, and most importantly keeps longer soil moisture in dry seasons.
2.3 Photos of the Technology
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Rwanda
Region/ State/ Province:
Rwanda
Further specification of location:
Kirehe District (Eastern province)
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- 10-50 years ago
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through land users' innovation
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
Main crops (cash and food crops):
major cash crop and major food crop: Banana
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Banana plantation is sensitive to dry season where evapotranspiration is high, and high erosion impact in rainy season.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Surface runoff
Future (final) land use (after implementation of SLM Technology): Cropland: Cp: Perennial (non-woody) cropping
If land use has changed due to the implementation of the Technology, indicate land use before implementation of the Technology:
Grazing land: Ge: Extensive grazing land
3.3 Further information about land use
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- rainfed
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 2
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 180; Longest growing period from month to month: Sept to mid Febr; Second longest growing period in days: 150; Second longest growing period from month to month: mid March to mid Jun
3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- improved ground/ vegetation cover
- integrated soil fertility management
3.5 Spread of the Technology
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
- 10-100 km2
Comments:
The area covered by this technology has been estimated
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
agronomic measures
- A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
structural measures
- S4: Level ditches, pits
Comments:
Main measures: agronomic measures, structural measures
Type of agronomic measures: mulching, manure / compost / residues, pits
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by water
- Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
Comments:
Main causes of degradation: soil management (Lack of knowledge in soil conservation practices.), droughts (it tend to happen due to the unpredictable rainfed changes), population pressure (as the population increases the soil exploitation increases as well)
Secondary causes of degradation: poverty / wealth
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- reduce land degradation
Comments:
Secondary goals: prevention of land degradation, rehabilitation / reclamation of denuded land
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing
This technology consists of a pit of 0.6x2x2m respectively, for depth, length and width. Banana is planted in center of each pit in which organic manure from different sources is added and mixed with the soil. The spacing along the row and between rows is 5 m. The top soil is taken back and only 15-30 kg of organic manure are added and mixed with soil. Attention should be made when adding the mixed soil to the pits as a radius of 20 cm starting from the center of the pit where the banana is planted must not be filled with the mixture but filled merely with soil.
Location: Kayonza. Kayonza/South/Rwanda
Date: 2013
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate
Technical knowledge required for land users: low
Main technical functions: increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil, water harvesting / increase water supply
Secondary technical functions: control of raindrop splash, improvement of ground cover, improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), increase of groundwater level / recharge of groundwater, increase of biomass (quantity)
Mulching
Material/ species: grasses, crop residues and strow of banana
Quantity/ density: 50,000 m3
Remarks: in bananas field the thickness of mulch is about 5 cm, which including a total quantity of 50,000 m3
Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: farmyard manure
Quantity/ density: 12t/ha
Remarks: According to the spacing only 400 banana can be grown per ha and a pits may receive 30 kg of FYM
Pits
Material/ species: A pit have a distance of 2m x 2m with 60cm deep
Quantity/ density: 400pitsha
Remarks: The distance between two pits is 1 m which means 5m between 2 consecutive banana
4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
Specify currency used for cost calculations:
- US Dollars
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
1.70
4.4 Establishment activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Establishment of pits | ||
2. | Seedling plantation | ||
3. | Seedling transportation |
4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Land preparation, planting, thinning weeding | persons/day/ha | 221.7647 | 1.7 | 377.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Acquisition of suckers | ha | 1.0 | 937.5 | 937.5 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | Compost manure | ha | 1.0 | 650.0 | 650.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 1994.5 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 1 month(s)
4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Thinning banana field | Agronomic | dry season |
2. | Weeding | Agronomic | rainy season |
3. | Planting seedlings | Agronomic | rainy season |
4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | Thinning and weeding | ha | 1.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 67.0 |
4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
The labor affects most the cost of this technology. However, suckers or planting materials could increase the cost if not readily available at farm gate or in the neighborhood.
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- sub-humid
Thermal climate class: tropics
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
- concave situations
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil fertility is medium
Soil drainage / infiltration is medium
Soil water storage capacity is medium - low
5.4 Water availability and quality
Ground water table:
5-50 m
Availability of surface water:
poor/ none
Water quality (untreated):
poor drinking water (treatment required)
5.5 Biodiversity
Species diversity:
- medium
Comments and further specifications on biodiversity:
The mulched land become a suitable niche of many kind of lizard and rat
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
- 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- poor
- average
Individuals or groups:
- individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
- manual work
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users
Population density: 200-500 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 2% - 3%
20% of the land users are average wealthy and own 70% of the land.
78% of the land users are poor and own 20% of the land.
2% of the land users are poor and own 5% of the land.
5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
- medium-scale
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, titled
Land use rights:
- individual
Water use rights:
- open access (unorganized)
5.9 Access to services and infrastructure
health:
- poor
- moderate
- good
education:
- poor
- moderate
- good
technical assistance:
- poor
- moderate
- good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
- poor
- moderate
- good
markets:
- poor
- moderate
- good
energy:
- poor
- moderate
- good
roads and transport:
- poor
- moderate
- good
drinking water and sanitation:
- poor
- moderate
- good
financial services:
- poor
- moderate
- good
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
Quantity before SLM:
50 tons
Quantity after SLM:
190 tons
Comments/ specify:
Because of the new technology the yield is 4 fold
risk of production failure
Income and costs
expenses on agricultural inputs
farm income
Quantity before SLM:
1233
Quantity after SLM:
4687
Comments/ specify:
The net family income has improved by 4 fold
Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
Quantity before SLM:
125
Quantity after SLM:
258
health situation
Quantity before SLM:
70%
Quantity after SLM:
90%
livelihood and human well-being
Comments/ specify:
The technology increases banana production and the net farm income
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
surface runoff
evaporation
Soil
soil moisture
soil cover
soil loss
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
groundwater/ river pollution
6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
drought | not well |
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly negative
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
- more than 50%
If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):
43000 housheolds covering 80 percent of stated area
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 90-100%
Comments:
43000 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
There is a strong trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
Increase production How can they be sustained / enhanced? Regular maintenance |
Reduce surface runoff by enhancing the retention soil moisture How can they be sustained / enhanced? Regular maintenance |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Increased food security and income of land users How can they be sustained / enhanced? Scaling up the technology |
Increased water holding capacity How can they be sustained / enhanced? Good maintenance by regularly replacing mulch |
Increased soil moisture How can they be sustained / enhanced? Good maintenance by adding very often organic manure |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
This technology maybe expensive at establishment phase, maybe not affordable by every smallholder farmer | Allow farmers to access credits through farmer saving schemes or cooperatives |
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules