This is an outdated, inactive version of this case. Go to the current version.
Technologies
Inactive

Multistorey Gardens [Kenya]

Multistorey Gardens

technologies_1322 - Kenya

Completeness: 80%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:

Gathenya Mwangi

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

P.O.Box, 62000-00200, Nairobi, Juja, Kenya

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Home Patrick

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

P.O.Box, 62000-00200, Nairobi, Juja, Kenya

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Chege Timothy

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

P.O.Box, 62000-00200, Nairobi, Juja, Kenya

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Adamba Omwange

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

P.O.Box, 62000-00200, Nairobi, Juja, Kenya

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Baobab Kimengich

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

P.O.Box, 62000-00200, Nairobi, Juja, Kenya

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Wamuongo Jane

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute

Nairobi

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Karanja Andrew

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute

Nairobi

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Namirembe Sara

+254 20 7224000

World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)

United Nations Avenue, P. O. Box 30677, Nairobi

Kenya

Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Jomo Kenyatta University (Jomo Kenyatta University) - Kenya
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
KARI Headquarters (KARI Headquarters) - Kenya
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) - Kenya

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

19/09/2012

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Ja

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

Nee

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

Multistory gardens refer to upright polythene sack filled with soil, in which food crops like vegetables, kales, carrots or onions grow on its sides.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

Multistory gardening is an innovative and exciting technology for year round vegetable gardening. Multi-storey farming not only makes efficient use of water but it is also safe from droughts and floods

Purpose of the Technology: This micro-gardening concept being a low input activity is ideal where labor and other resources are scarce. Multi-storey gardens lead to development of self reliance in vegetables for nutrition and food security in the vulnerable households.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Materials required for multi-storey gardening include empty cereal bag or animal feed bag, one empty oil can or 6”PVC pipe with holes, 2buckets small stones, 6 buckets soil, 6 buckets manure, seeds, adequate water to irrigate the bag garden and gardening tools. The following procedure is used to set up the garden. 1) Mix the soil and well decomposed manure thoroughly. 2) Cut out the bottom of the oil can and make holes on the sides. 3) Fold back the bag and fill the bottom 15cm with small stones. 4) Place the can on top of the small stones in the center of the bag. 5) Fill the oil can with small stones 6) Fill the area between the oil can and the bag with the soil-manure mixture up to the can level. 7) Pull up the can to the level of the soil compost mixture with a tilting motion. Repeat steps 5, 6 and 7 until the bag is full and a central core of stones is formed leaving the tin at the top of the bag garden. Pour water into the tin through the central core till the soil is soaked.

Natural / human environment: Multistory gardens technology is suitable for urban gardening in Kenya where land for farming has greatly reduced due to urbanization.These bag gardens are also suitable for dry, non fertile areas where soils are not suitable for conventional gardening, areas with water scarcity..

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Kenya

Region/ State/ Province:

Eastern Province

Further specification of location:

Embu

2.6 Date of implementation

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
  • less than 10 years ago (recently)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • through projects/ external interventions

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • improve production
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

Cropland

  • Annual cropping
Comments:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Effects of strong moving wind causes great soil erosion, but the presence of multistorey crops alternates the wind energy, hence lowering its effects.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Greatest soil erosion and also bending of crops in the farms

Constraints of settlement / urban

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 1
Specify:

Longest growing period in days: 180, Second longest growing period in days: 180

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • home gardens

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
  • < 0.1 km2 (10 ha)

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

agronomic measures

agronomic measures

  • A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
vegetative measures

vegetative measures

  • V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
Comments:

Type of agronomic measures: better crop cover

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

soil erosion by wind

soil erosion by wind

  • Et: loss of topsoil
Comments:

Main causes of degradation: soil management, urbanisation and infrastructure development, land tenure

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • prevent land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

Author:

Paul Kahiga, 62000-00200 Nairobi

Date:

28/10/2012

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

This is a technical drawing showing a typical multi-storey garden technology for vegetable production. It comprises of a perforated polythene bag with a central Perforated PVC pipe (for water application) and vegetables planted on the outer surfaces.

Location: Mbeere South District. Eastern Province

Main technical functions: spatial arrangement and diversification of land use

Better crop cover
Material/ species: vegetables (kales and spinach)
Quantity/ density: 8
Remarks: per line

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

other/ national currency (specify):

Kshs

Indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (if relevant): 1 USD =:

100.0

Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:

500.00

4.4 Establishment activities

Activity Type of measure Timing
1. Purchase polythene bag Agronomic
2. Purchase manure (FYM) Agronomic
3. Purchase seedlings Agronomic
Comments:

Lifespan of the polythene bag: 5 years
Lifespan of the manure: 1 year
Lifespan of the seedlings: 1 year

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Labour Labour per 10 bags 2.0 2.5 5.0 100.0
Equipment Tools ha 1.0 20.0 20.0 100.0
Plant material Seedlings Seedlings 320.0 0.00156 0.5 92.0
Fertilizers and biocides Manure 20.0 0.05 1.0 100.0
Construction material Polythene bag Bags 10.0 0.25 2.5 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 29.0
Comments:

Duration of establishment phase: 1 month(s)

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Type of measure Timing/ frequency
1. weeding Agronomic 2
2. harvesting Agronomic 3 per week

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Weeding Mandyas 3.0 0.8333 2.5 100.0
Labour Harvesting Mandays 1.0 2.5 2.5 100.0
Equipment Tools Ha 1.0 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 7.0

4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

Labor is the most determinate factor affecting the costs.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • semi-arid

Thermal climate class: tropics

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.

Soil fertility: Medium
Soil drainage/infiltration: Medium
Soil water storage capacity: Medium

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

5-50 m

Availability of surface water:

medium

Water quality (untreated):

for agricultural use only (irrigation)

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • medium

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation of production system:
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
  • less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users
Population density: 10-50 persons/km2
Annual population growth: < 0.5%

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • small-scale

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land use rights:
  • individual
Water use rights:
  • individual

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased

risk of production failure

increased
decreased
Water availability and quality

demand for irrigation water

increased
decreased
Income and costs

diversity of income sources

decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts

food security/ self-sufficiency

reduced
improved

Improved livelihoods and human well-being

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Improves dietary diversification

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Meteorological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
local rainstorm well

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

Comments:

There is a little trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology

Comments on adoption trend: It is a new technology

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Growing of vegetables all year round and less water is used for irrigation
Labour efficient means of increasing food security
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Multi-storey gardens contributes to dietary diversification among the practicing communities.
Contributes to income generation.
Encourages self reliance and empowers women in rural areas.

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys
  • interviews with land users

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules