Biogas Digester for Biomass Energy [China]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Yaolin Wang
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Deborah Niggli, Alexandra Gavilano
technologies_1576 - China
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Best Practices for Land Degradation Control in Dryland Areas of China (Best Practices China)1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Ja
1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology
Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?
Nee
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
By established facilities and use organic matter of animal manure, human waste, plant straw for anaerobic fermentation to produce inflammable biogas for uses of lighting, cooking with the residue liquid and dreg for high quality organic fertilizer.
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
The demonstration site is located at Jingyuan County of central Gansu Province, an arid county with annual rainfall of 240 mm for rainfed agriculture. The vegetation cover of the county is 5.6% and the water and soil erosion affected area is 5359 square kilometers or 92.2% of the total land area. The fragile ecologie and serious land degradation made the locality a very poor place, short of fuel. Poverty and ecological degradation has formed a vicious circle. Energy scarcity problem that needs to be solved urgently is also a cutting point for curbing land degradation.
Since 2000, with the support of relevant departments, the biogas production technology has been introduced and extended in Jingyuan County. Due to its multiple functions in the kitchen, toilets, animal houses etc., it has obvious social, ecological and economic benefits. The technology is easy and the maintenance is simple, so the extension is quick.
The construction procedures include: location identification, digester type selection (e.g. rotational-flowed digester), determination of elevation, earthwork, and construction of digester base, digester wall, feed and discharge chutes, proof seal layer and digester cover etc..
Biogas digester operation preparation: inoculum input, raw material pretreatment and ratio, prohibition of input materials (poisonous farm chemicals, oil dregs, bones or bone powder etc).
The operational management: pH value must be kept at 6.8-7.5 and digester fermentation temperature maintained over 10 degrees Celsius; Replace desulfurizer every three months, stir frequently to ferment raw material, inspect often to ensure no leakage in the cover, pipeline etc.; frequent work in feeding and discharging, control the density of liquid material.
(1) Ecologically, the use of biogas can reduce vegetation damage and prevent land degradation. A biogas digester with a capacity of 10 m3 can economize 2 tons of firewood every year, which is equivalent to the annual increment of 3.5 mu firewood forest; The dregs and residue liquid are organic fertilizers, the liquid can also be used for the treatment of plant diseases and pests;
(2) Social benefits: The biogas digester may offer over 70% clean energy for the household while reducing the consumption of the conventional energies of firewood and coal; The life quality, sanitary condition are improved and the workload of women is decreased; The use of biogas digester promotes social progress by raising the awareness of science and technology of the farmers to promote the construction of new socialist countryside.
(3) Economically the biogas will increase the income of farmers. It can cut down the expenditure by 1500 Yuan for one year. Biogas use can promote livestock development and as an environmental-friendly agriculture development model.
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
China
Region/ State/ Province:
Gansu Province
Further specification of location:
Jingyuan
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 5809.4 km2.
Map
×3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- create beneficial economic impact
- create beneficial social impact
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Land use mixed within the same land unit:
Ja
Specify mixed land use (crops/ grazing/ trees):
- Agroforestry
Cropland
- Annual cropping
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 1
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 180, Longest growing period from month to month: April to September
Settlements, infrastructure
- Settlements, buildings
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): low vegetation cover, wind erosion, water erosion, barren soil, arid climate, fragile ecological condition.
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- energy efficiency technologies
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
other measures
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by wind
- Et: loss of topsoil
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):
Main technical functions: Protect vegetation, reduce water erosion, prevent wind erosions
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | Materials, cement, sand, cooker | |
2. | Labour 7.5 person days | |
3. | Other: Transport fee |
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | labour | person days | 7.5 | 5.333 | 40.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Cemet, sand, cooker | 1.0 | 267.0 | 267.0 | ||
Other | transport fee | 1.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 | |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 347.0 | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD | 347.0 |
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- arid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- medium (1-3%)
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- subsistence (self-supply)
Off-farm income:
- 10-50% of all income
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
- collectives
Land use rights:
- individual
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Income and costs
farm income
Socio-cultural impacts
Improve knowledge level and technology dissemination
Alliviate women’s labor burden
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
surface runoff
Soil
soil cover
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals
Vegetation cover
Climate and disaster risk reduction
wind velocity
Other ecological impacts
Save energies of coal, firewood etc
Improve living environment
Promote development of environmental friendly agriculture
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
downstream siltation
wind transported sediments
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
negative
Long-term returns:
positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
positive
Long-term returns:
positive
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Protect vegetation |
Prevent soil and water erosion |
Economical use of energy |
Serve the development of organic agriculture |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
high initial investment | get more project support |
low gas production | strengthen training for correct operation |
biogas can be dangerous | strengthen training |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
- field visits, field surveys
- interviews with land users
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
06/09/2007
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules