Tree farming [Uganda]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Alex Lwakuba
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Fabian Ottiger, Alexandra Gavilano
technologies_988 - Uganda
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
SLM specialist:
Okotel William
Ministry of Agriculture, animal industry and fishery (MAAIF)
Uganda
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry, and Fisheries of Uganda (MAAIF) - Uganda1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Ja
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
the SWC technology entails growing of markhamia lutea trees like food crops involving application of manure and mulch.
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
Markhamia lutea are grown in lines in the homestead. They are mulched, prunned and organic manures applied. After 2-3 yrs, harvesting of poles can commerce.
Purpose of the Technology: for addition source of income, windbreak, poles for construction and firewood.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The trees are free seedlings. Wildlings are picked and planted in rows. They are raised in a nursery before transplanting.
Natural / human environment: technology is located in a semi arid area. It is vegetative involving trees. Soils are sandy loams and are shallow.
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Uganda
Region/ State/ Province:
Kumi
Further specification of location:
Kumi
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If precise area is not known, indicate approximate area covered:
- 1-10 km2
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 10 km2.
technology used by other farmers
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- more than 50 years ago (traditional)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- as part of a traditional system (> 50 years)
Comments (type of project, etc.):
farmers own intiative, bulding on traditional knowledge
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- create beneficial economic impact
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Annual cropping
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
- Tree and shrub cropping
- Markhamia lutea
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 2
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 90 Longest growing period from month to month: Mar - Jun Second longest growing period in days: 85 Second longest growing period from month to month: Sep - Nov
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): declining soil fertility, inadequate rainfall, wind erosion, small land sizes, pest and diseases
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): deforestation, decline in productivity, wind erosion
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- windbreak/ shelterbelt
- improved ground/ vegetation cover
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by wind
- Et: loss of topsoil
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
Comments:
Main type of degradation addressed: Et: loss of topsoil
Secondary types of degradation addressed: Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- reduce land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high
Technical knowledge required for land users: low
Main technical functions: increase of surface roughness
Secondary technical functions: increase in organic matter, wind-break
Vegetative measure: tree planting in rows
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 5000
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.1
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 2
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Trees/ shrubs species: markhamia lutes
Gradient along the rows / strips: 0.00%
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | clearing site, land preparation | dry season |
2. | planting of seedling, tending of seedling | rainy season |
3. | manuring | beginning of rainy season |
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Seedlings | ha | 1.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 230.0 | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD | 230.0 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 12 month(s)
4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|
1. | Application of manure from Kraal | beginning of rains / each cropping season |
2. | Beginning of rainy season | dry season/each cropping season |
3. | Application of manure | rainy season /each cropping season |
4. | Mulching | end of rainy season /each cropping season |
4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 1685.0 | 1685.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 1695.0 | |||||
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD | 1695.0 |
Comments:
Machinery/ tools: hoes, knives
area/size of the planted area
4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
labour especially for land preparation, hole digging and planting trees
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- semi-arid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- low (<1%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil fertility: Low
Soil drainage/infiltration: Good
Soil water storage capacity: Low
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Off-farm income:
- > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
- rich
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Population density: 100-200 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 3% - 4%
Off-farm income specification: the user is a civil servant
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
wood production
Income and costs
farm income
workload
Comments/ specify:
Hindered farm operations
Socio-cultural impacts
Aestethic value
Ecological impacts
Soil
soil cover
soil loss
Climate and disaster risk reduction
wind velocity
Other ecological impacts
Modification of the environment
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
wind transported sediments
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
very positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):
50 % of area stated
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 11-50%
Comments:
30% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
70 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
Comments on spontaneous adoption: estimates
There is a strong trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: national campaign, farmer to farmer interraction
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
multiple benefits How can they be sustained / enhanced? train them |
easy to establish and maintain |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
easy to establish How can they be sustained / enhanced? empowering landusers with technical skills of nursery establishment and management |
easy to maintain |
multiple benefits |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
land cannot be used for other puposes |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
not fit for small parcels of land | intergrate into cropping system |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules