Rehabilitation of Fallow Land Through Agroforestry [Bhutan]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Nima Dolma Tamang
- Editor: Tashi Wangdi
- Reviewers: William Critchley, Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Sa Tong Lar Log
technologies_6839 - Bhutan
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
Key resource person(s)
land user:
Zangpo Dawa
Khengrig Namsum Cooperative
Bhutan
land user:
Wangmo Tashi
Khenrig Namsum Cooperative
Bhutan
land user:
Wangmo Pema
Khenrig Namsum Cooperative
Bhutan
land user:
Dolkar Tshering
Khenrig Namsum Cooperative
Bhutan
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Strengthening national-level institutional and professional capacities of country Parties towards enhanced UNCCD monitoring and reporting – GEF 7 EA Umbrella II (GEF 7 UNCCD Enabling Activities_Umbrella II)Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
National Soil Services Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock (NSSC) - Bhutan1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Ja
1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology
Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?
Nee
Comments:
As per the responses made by the land users (cooperative representatives), the rehabilitation of fallow land through agroforestry has been a successful SLM indicator towards mitigating and adapting land degradation, securing food, and ultimate livelihood enhancement.
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Fallow is arable land deliberately set aside due to challenges faced in cultivation. The rehabilitation of lands left fallow for decades through the adoption of agroforestry has been one success story of the Khengrig Namsum Cooperative in the central region of Bhutan. The integration of perennial trees (fruit and high-value trees) and seasonal crops creates environmental, economic, and social benefits.
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
Fallow land is the term for arable fields either partially or completely left unused and unproductive, owing to reasons such as labour shortages, lack of irrigation, human-wildlife conflict and/or the plots being far away from the settlements. Land rehabilitation is a promising approach towards mitigating the fallow land issue. Thus, the Khengrig Namsum Cooperative (KNC), a registered firm under the Department of Agriculture Marketing and Cooperatives, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MoAL), Bhutan has ventured into rehabilitating 235 acres (94 ha) of fallow lands since 2016, through the adoption of agroforestry. The KNC was founded by Mr. Thinley Wangdi (the current chairman), with the motive of improving the livelihoods of the people of Zhemgang Dzongkhag through locally grown farm produce.
The KNC with funds from the Global Environment Facility - Small Grant Program (GEF–SGP) through the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Bhutan, revived the fallow through agroforestry (intercropping of banana and bamboo plants). The KNC intervened in three strategic locations, benefitting 36 households. This particular agroforestry approach was not only aimed towards enhancing livelihoods but also to diversify production: through banana chips production and bamboo product development.
Upon securing the funds, implementation started with the procurement of planting and fencing materials, hands-on training, and then planting and fencing activities. Installation of electric fencing was done to reduce human-wildlife conflict. There was specific training on product development. Moreover, the KNC was able to link up with nearby schools for the school feeding programme, to supply fruits and vegetables. The cooperative demonstrates skills in processing its own products and enabling better access to renewable natural resources in the locality. On the contrary, not having proper cold storage facilities has negative impacts on processing units and has resulted in unreliable market coupling.
2.3 Photos of the Technology
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Bhutan
Region/ State/ Province:
Zhemgang Dzongkhag
Further specification of location:
Rebati Chiwog under Ngangla Gewog, Brumbi and Jiwongolia Chiwog under Trong Gewog
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, specify area covered (in km2):
0.95
Is/are the technology site(s) located in a permanently protected area?
Nee
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
Indicate year of implementation:
2015
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through projects/ external interventions
Comments (type of project, etc.):
The implementation of activity in Rebati and Brumbi started in 2016, whereas for Jiwongolia, it started in the year 2019. The Global Environment Facility - Small Grant Program (GEF-SGP) under the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has funded the program in the Rebati and Brumbi communities. Likewise, the Bhutan Foundation and the HELVETAS have funded the programme in Jiwongolia. The fallow land rehabilitation program was the initiative of Khengrig Namsum Cooperative.
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
- reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
- preserve/ improve biodiversity
- create beneficial economic impact
- create beneficial social impact
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Land use mixed within the same land unit:
Ja
Specify mixed land use (crops/ grazing/ trees):
- Agroforestry
Cropland
- Annual cropping
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
- Tree and shrub cropping
Annual cropping - Specify crops:
- cereals - maize
- root/tuber crops - potatoes
- vegetables - melon, pumpkin, squash or gourd
- Ginger, turmeric
Perennial (non-woody) cropping - Specify crops:
- banana/plantain/abaca
Tree and shrub cropping - Specify crops:
- avocado
- citrus
- tree nuts (brazil nuts, pistachio, walnuts, almonds, etc.)
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 2
Is intercropping practiced?
Ja
If yes, specify which crops are intercropped:
Bananas and bamboo are intercropped as an agroforestry measure.
Is crop rotation practiced?
Ja
If yes, specify:
Ginger followed by trumeric
Forest/ woodlands
- (Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands
(Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands: Specify management type:
- Selective felling
- Non-wood forest use
Type of (semi-)natural forest:
- subtropical humid forest natural vegetation
Are the trees specified above deciduous or evergreen?
- mixed deciduous/ evergreen
Products and services:
- Timber
- Other forest products
3.3 Has land use changed due to the implementation of the Technology?
Has land use changed due to the implementation of the Technology?
- Yes (Please fill out the questions below with regard to the land use before implementation of the Technology)
Land use mixed within the same land unit:
Nee
Grazing land
Extensive grazing:
- Semi-nomadic pastoralism
Animal type:
- cattle - dairy
Is integrated crop-livestock management practiced?
Nee
Products and services:
- milk
Forest/ woodlands
- (Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands
(Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands: Specify management type:
- Selective felling
- Non-wood forest use
Type of (semi-)natural forest:
- subtropical humid forest natural vegetation
Are the trees specified above deciduous or evergreen?
- mixed deciduous/ evergreen
Products and services:
- Timber
- Other forest products
Comments:
The land use has changed in the case of Brumbi and Jiwongolia, where these places were fallow (forest) earlier. A few pockets of Jiwongolia were used as pastureland by the nearby communities. With the intervention from Khengrig Namsum Cooperative (KNC), these areas were brought under cultivation through an agroforestry approach. The land use system in Rebati however has remained the same. The KNC intervened in this community through the facilitation of banana seedlings, mainly intending to ensure the supply of bananas for their banana chip production.
3.4 Water supply
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- rainfed
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- agroforestry
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
agronomic measures
- A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
vegetative measures
- V1: Tree and shrub cover
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by water
- Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
- Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
soil erosion by wind
- Et: loss of topsoil
biological degradation
- Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
- Bh: loss of habitats
Comments:
The land users have noted that the implementation of agroforestry technology has proven highly effective in mitigating surface runoff and gully erosion, especially in the area of Jiwongolia. This issue was exacerbated by the drainage outlet from the nearby highway motor road.
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- prevent land degradation
- reduce land degradation
Comments:
Agroforestry plays a crucial role in both preventing and alleviating land degradation. Lands that are incorporated into agroforestry practices are effectively managed and optimized for various uses, resulting in increased ground coverage throughout the year and appropriate nutrient management. The stewardship of these productive lands through agroforestry not only mitigates land degradation in areas already affected by it but also serves as a preventive measure in potential sites susceptible to land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):
The technical drawing shows the banana plant and bamboo intercropped.
Author:
Ongpo Lepcha
Date:
11/12/2023
4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
- per Technology area
Indicate size and area unit:
235 acres
other/ national currency (specify):
Ngultrum (Nu.)
If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:
80.0
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
Nu. 450
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | Explored funds from UNDP through development of project proposal, led by the chairman | 2016 |
2. | Forest clearing and development using tractor at Brumbi and Rebati | December 2016 - November 2018 |
3. | Electric fencing | February 2017 - May 2017 |
4. | Procurement of fruit seedlings (local banana and bamboo) from Bhur nursery, Sarpang Dzongkhag | May 2017 - July 2018 |
5. | Hands-on-training on fruit tree plantations (KNC members and other farmers) and product development from bamboo | May 2017 - November 2018 |
6. | Plantation of banana seedlings and bamboo | June 2018 |
Comments:
The plantation of bananas and bamboo in Rebati was done at the periphery of the community, not encroaching on the actual cultivated agricultural fields. Whereas, in Brumbi and Jiwongolia, mass plantation was carried out.
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labor | person days | 1440.0 | 451.0 | 649440.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Land preparation | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 725432.0 | 725432.0 | |
Plant material | Cost of seedlings (local banana and bamboo) | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 979170.0 | 979170.0 | |
Construction material | Electric fencing | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 267410.0 | 267410.0 | |
Construction material | Plantation of bamboo and banana | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 231594.0 | 231594.0 | |
Other | Project administration and participation | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 182042.0 | 182042.0 | |
Other | Project signboard and installation | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 19500.0 | 19500.0 | |
Other | Formulation of by-laws and agreements | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 72301.0 | 72301.0 | |
Other | Hands-on-training on plantations and product development | Lumpsum | 1.0 | 100781.0 | 100781.0 | |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 3227670.0 | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD | 40345.88 |
Comments:
The expenditure amounts are reflected as 'lumpsum' as the listed activity head comprises many sub-activities with different units of expression, which are not at all possible to mention completely.
4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|
1. | Replacement of electric fence poles | Every after three years (winter) |
2. | Replacement of solar batteries | replaced once (1 battery) |
3. | Replacement of fruit plants | Every season |
4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Comments:
The replacement of poles and fruit seedlings has not incurred any cost as these activities are carried out by the land users as an when required.
4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
The most important factors affecting the costs while implementing this technology is land preparation and plantation of seedlings.
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Specifications/ comments on rainfall:
The rainfall data of 2017 was used
Indicate the name of the reference meteorological station considered:
Station: Bhur, Type: Class A, Station ID: 23310046
Agro-climatic zone
- humid
The area falls under the warm and humid Subtropical zone among the six Agroecological zones of Bhutan.
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
- concave situations
Comments and further specifications on topography:
The slope of the area ranges from about 6 - 15%.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
Topsoil organic matter:
- high (>3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Moisture content 2.25%, organic matter 3.27%, Organic carbon 1.90%, pH 6.42, electrical conductivity 213.47 µs/cm, nitrogen 0.10%, phosphorus 0.66 ppm, Potassium 138.73 mg/100ml, texture sand.
The soil analysis was conducted at the Science Laboratory of College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Lobesa, Punakha.
5.4 Water availability and quality
Availability of surface water:
good
Water quality (untreated):
good drinking water
Water quality refers to:
surface water
Is water salinity a problem?
Nee
Is flooding of the area occurring?
Nee
5.5 Biodiversity
Species diversity:
- high
Habitat diversity:
- high
Comments and further specifications on biodiversity:
The lush surroundings at the periphery, abundant vegetation cover, and the noticeable presence of agroforestry practices all point to a significant level of diversity in species and habitats
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Sedentary or nomadic:
- Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
- commercial/ market
Off-farm income:
- less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
Individuals or groups:
- cooperative
Level of mechanization:
- mechanized/ motorized
Gender:
- women
- men
Age of land users:
- youth
- middle-aged
5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
- large-scale
Comments:
The land area spreads over 235 acres, falling under the large-scale category referring to the local context. In general, the average household land holding in Bhutan is 3.4 acres.
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- state
- Family land ownership
Land use rights:
- leased
- individual
Water use rights:
- communal (organized)
Are land use rights based on a traditional legal system?
Ja
Specify:
The land use rights in Bhutan is traditional legal system guided by formal land act and land rules and regulations.
Comments:
The 230 acres land of Rebati (150) and Brumbi (80) have the the family ownership, whereas the 5 acres land of Jiwongolia is on lease (state land).
5.9 Access to services and infrastructure
health:
- poor
- moderate
- good
education:
- poor
- moderate
- good
technical assistance:
- poor
- moderate
- good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
- poor
- moderate
- good
markets:
- poor
- moderate
- good
energy:
- poor
- moderate
- good
roads and transport:
- poor
- moderate
- good
drinking water and sanitation:
- poor
- moderate
- good
financial services:
- poor
- moderate
- good
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
Comments/ specify:
Crop production increased exponentially in Rebati, where crop production prevailed before the introduction of the agroforestry system. For the reverted fallow land in Brumbi and Jiwongolia, crop production increased by 100%. The abundant availability of bananas from the rehabilitated areas has greatly facilitated the cooperative employees in procuring a sufficient quantity of bananas for banana chip production. Previously, they had to embark on time-consuming journeys to various locations to source bananas, which not only proved laborious but also led to an increase in production costs.
crop quality
Quantity before SLM:
Local varieties
Quantity after SLM:
Improved varieties
Comments/ specify:
The cultivation of enhanced banana varieties, including G9, Jaji, and Dosari, has resulted in a noticeable enhancement in quality
fodder production
Comments/ specify:
Following the harvest of banana fruit, the stems and leaves are utilized as fodder for livestock
risk of production failure
Comments/ specify:
The risk of production failure is minimized as the land users engage in agroforestry, diversifying their income sources. Their earnings do not rely solely on one crop; instead, they come from a variety of sources, including bamboo products, bananas, vegetables, and spices. Consequently, if one crop encounters difficulties or fails, the other crops can continue to generate income for the cooperative
product diversity
Comments/ specify:
Agroforestry promotes the diverse cultivation of both forest and agricultural plants, resulting in a wide range of products. As an example, the land users are able to produce bamboo products, spices, and banana chips due to the diversity of their cultivation practices
production area
Comments/ specify:
The technology is implemented in the previously uncultivated land (fallow) leading to the increased production area.
land management
Comments/ specify:
The conversion of fallow land into cultivated land has enhanced land management and stewardship. This transformation involves the addition of manure and timely interventions, effectively reducing soil erosion and improving the overall care of the land
Income and costs
expenses on agricultural inputs
Comments/ specify:
There are increased expenses on agricultural inputs. However, the increased expenses are compensated by the income generated from the farm.
farm income
Quantity before SLM:
Nu. 23,00,000/- annual income
Quantity after SLM:
Nu. 55,00,000/- annual income
Comments/ specify:
The ready availability of bananas as a raw material has significantly boosted the production of banana chips and led to a substantial increase in the annual revenue of the cooperative. Furthermore, land users supplying bananas to the cooperatives have also experienced a rise in their annual income
diversity of income sources
Comments/ specify:
The KNC has diverse value-added products and natural products such as watermelon, bamboo products, and homemade pickles diversifying their income sources.
workload
Comments/ specify:
Reduced workload due to increased availability of raw materials for banana chip processing.
Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
Comments/ specify:
The staff of the KNC is food secure due to increased income generated from the cooperative. Likewise, the land users supplying raw materials are also meeting the food security from the income generated by supplying raw materials to the KNC. The land users are self-sufficient in bananas, bamboo and some spices.
health situation
Comments/ specify:
The land users shared that the improved annual income is directly related to improved health and well-being of the family/community.
cultural opportunities
Comments/ specify:
Their venture into such activity has added value to the community, where the community has been recognized as one of the successful pilot sites for rehabilitating fallow lands. Moreover, external visitors are attracted to witness the success of the community.
Also, the community bond has been strengthened, through an approach like labour sharing practised during the implementation of the technology.
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
Comments/ specify:
Before, the land users' knowledge about SLM technologies was confined to a few technologies. Now they have realized that SLM is a holistic approach involving different technologies. Therefore, the understanding and knowledge of agroforestry as one of the SLM measures has been enhanced.
situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups
Comments/ specify:
Disadvantaged families constrained by poor market access benefited from this technology.
Ecological impacts
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals
Vegetation cover
Comments/ specify:
The plantation of banana plants and bamboo has covered a wide range of land, leading to better vegetation cover.
biomass/ above ground C
Comments/ specify:
The increased vegetation cover by different fruit, bamboo, and vegetables leads to increased above-ground biomass.
beneficial species
Comments/ specify:
Agroforestry harbours various plant species attracting diverse beneficial insects that feed on these plants.
habitat diversity
Comments/ specify:
The destruction of natural habitats has been decreased due reduced dependency of land users on wild bamboo products.
Climate and disaster risk reduction
landslides/ debris flows
Comments/ specify:
The risk of surface erosion has been mitigated due to improved ground cover.
wind velocity
Comments/ specify:
Cultivation of bamboo species reduces wind velocity reducing surface erosion.
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
Biological diversity conservation
Comments/ specify:
Biological diversity increased due to the cultivation of different plant species which also act as a habitat for different insects and birds.
6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)
Gradual climate change
Gradual climate change
Season | increase or decrease | How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|---|---|
annual temperature | increase | very well | |
annual rainfall | decrease | very well |
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
Meteorological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
local rainstorm | very well |
local thunderstorm | very well |
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
heatwave | very well |
extreme winter conditions | very well |
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
very positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
very positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
Comments:
The agroforestry with banana and bamboo plantations has been advantageous with both short-term and long-term benefits. For instance, banana gives fruiting in less than a year (9 months) after plantation.
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
- > 50%
If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):
36 households and one cooperative (KNC)
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 0-10%
6.6 Adaptation
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
Nee
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
Increased production area. The reversion of fallow land through agroforestry significantly increased the production area for the land users. |
Increased income. The easy access to the raw materials for KNC and easy market access for the land users leads to improved income for the KNC staff and land users supplying bananas to the cooperative. |
The technology is easy to implement as bananas and bamboo are perennial providing continuous income to the land users with little maintenance required. The land users need not be involved in agronomic practices such as land preparation and sowing every year. |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Restoration of cultivable land lost to forest encroachment. |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
Loss of cooperative members due to better opportunities, which ultimately would affect sustainability. | Provide timely incentives and adequate facilities. |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
Youths do not prefer to work in agriculture as it is viewed as laborious. | Introduce fully mechanized and smart farming systems to attract youth. |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
- field visits, field surveys
Visited all the three different locations under KNC (Rebati, Brumbi, and Jiwongolia)
- interviews with land users
Four employees of KNC
- compilation from reports and other existing documentation
UNDP documents, and archived documents of KNC
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
10/07/2023
7.3 Links to relevant online information
Title/ description:
Rehabilitation of fallow land through agroforestry, UNDP, 2020
URL:
https://www.undp.org/bhutan/stories/rehabilitation-fallow-land-through-agroforestry
Title/ description:
Background on Fallow Land Bank, NLCS, n.d.
URL:
https://flb.nlcs.gov.bt/index.php/background-on-fallow-land-bank/
Title/ description:
Khenrig Namsum Cooperative, HELVETAS Bhutan, 2019
URL:
http://csogrant.bt/khenrig-namsum-cooperative/
Title/ description:
WFP Bhutan Country Brief, OCHA services, 2023
URL:
https://reliefweb.int/report/bhutan/wfp-bhutan-country-brief-february-2023
Title/ description:
KNC-Zhemgang, Bhutan, n.d.
URL:
https://www.bhutan-network.org/portfolio/knc-zhemgang-bhutan/
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules