1.2 تفاصيل الاتصال بالأشخاص الرئيسيين لمصدر المعلومات والمؤسسات المعنية بتقييم وتوثيق النهج

اسم المشروع الذي سهّل توثيق/تقييم النهج (إذا كان ذلك على صلة)

Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods (ELMAR)

اسم المؤسسة (المؤسسات) التي سهلت توثيق/تقييم النهج (إذا كان ذلك على صلة)

Committee for Environment Protection of Tajikistan (Committee for Environment Protection of Tajikistan) - طاجيكستان

1.3 الشروط المتعلقة باستخدام البيانات الموثقة من خلال WOCAT

متى تم تجميع البيانات (ميدانيا)؟:

24/06/2018

يوافق جامع المعلومات والشخص (لاشخاص) الرئيسي لمصدر المعلومات على الشروط المتعلقة باستخدام البيانات الموثقة من خلال WOCAT:

نعم

2.1 وصف موجز للنهج

Improvement of the level of care and breeding cattle by opening a veterinary drugstore by this way to support livestock keepers somehow control pastures lands and livestock quantity

2.2 وصف تفصيلي للنهج

وصف تفصيلي للنهج:

Animal diseases would not mention by livestock keepers as a problem. Likely because they themselves perceive the present losses as unavoidable. The veterinary staff, however, estimates the annual losses of livestock due to diseases at 5-10%. Reasons given for this is that vaccines are often not made available for entire herd populations, but are only sufficient for around 70% of the total number of animals. Furthermore are some vaccination only carried out in case of an outbreak of disease (ring vaccination) and not as a routine. It was also noted that the privatization of veterinary services is problematic as the taxation of services is making it difficult for the vets in the rural areas to make a living out of their service provision. According to data infections diseases, such as gangrene, foot and mouth disease, brucellosis and other infectious diseases were registered in this rural area so depending on the season monitoring is conducted. Except for infectious diseases, there are other parasites infections are met in this rural area. In the case of not carrying out vaccination in a timely manner they will be spread, as well as failure to timely prevent other diseases leads to the loss of livestock, which will also reduce the economic level of the population and their living. This was the first problem, the second and the main is the balancing of fodder and livestock, and only villagers need to discuss how either the production of fodder can be increased or the number of animals can be reduced in order to achieve the potential production level of the animals, for which balancing fodder and number of livestock is a precondition. There are several options for how the balance between fodder and animals can be restored. The villagers need to have a plan and it would stipulate controlled grazing measures, this group does not have a plan but they some of the prevention activities. As the result of the approach, they opened livestock registered book that they regularly monitored the number of the livestock, calendar with the type of disease season, breeding process, mortality of the livestock, artificial insemination of animals at the clinic is planned to open, and species of birds. Additionally, vet clinic group specialists have been trained a different type of the training on; pasture assessment practical, how to develop and implement a scheme for rotational grazing, how to monitor potential pasture yields, determining the quality of fodder and feeds, housing process and so on. On behalf of the project for the representatives all the groups been provided composting, mulching, managing salinization, intercropping on slopes, drip irrigation, low-cost watering techniques, solar greenhouses, drought-resistant crops, bee-keeping, mixed fruit orchards, local varieties nurseries, rotational grazing, livestock breeding and maintaining, strategic watering points, use of perennial forage, solar energy technologies, marketing options and opportunities trainings through the facilitation organisation

2.3 صور عن النهج

2.5 البلد/المنطقة/المواقع التي تم تطبيق النهج فيها

2.6 تواريخ بدء وإنهاء تنفيذ النهج

2.7 نوع النهج

• قائم على مشروع/برنامج

2.8 الغايات/الأهداف الرئيسية للنهج

The main goal of approach is to prevent infectious diseases of animals in a timely manner and infection of domestic animals, as well as to provide treatment and preventive measures for infectious diseases, such as immunization of cattle and small cattle and improving pasture lands through prevention activities

2.9 الظروف التي تمكن أو تعيق تنفيذ التقنية/التقنيات المطبقة بموجب النهج

3.1 أصحاب المصلحة المعنيون بالنهج وأدوارهم

3.2 انخراط مستخدمي الأراضي المحليين/المجتمعات المحلية في المراحل المختلفة للنهج

	انخراط مستخدمي الأراضي المحليين/المجتمعات المحلية	حدد من شارك وصف الأنشطة
المبادرة/التحفيز	تفاعلي	There are 274 households residing in the village with the total number of 2225 people. The CIG head is Isroil Nazarov. He is as the specialist responsible for the subproject/approach activities implementation, make all their efforts and put their enthusiasm for the successful implementation
التخطيط	سلبي	The local land users prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment determined by the number of households and on behalf of the CAP participants decided on the allocation of investments to groups of households (Common Interest Groups, CIGs) using rules that limit the funding for any one household. At least 50% of the village households should participate in either farm production or land resource management investments.
التنفيذ	تفاعلي	Villagers made grant allocation decisions. CIGs managed grant funds and purchased needed materials and products.
الرصد/التقييم	سلبي	Local land users have activelly participated during the monitoring

3.3 مخطط التدفق (إذا كان متاحًا)

3.4 اتخاذ القرار بشأن اختيار تقنية/تقنيات الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي

حدد من الذي قرر اختيار التقنية/التقنيات التي سيتم تنفيذها:

• مستخدمو الأراضي بشكل أساسي، بدعم من متخصصي الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي

اشرح:

The local land users prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment determined by the number of households and on behalf of the CAP participants decided on the allocation of investments to groups of households (Common Interest Groups, CIGs) using rules that limit the funding for any one household

حدد على أي أساس تم اتخاذ القرارات:

• تقييم المعرفة الموثقة جيدًا بشأن الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي(اتخاذ القرارات القائمة على الأدلة)

• Project initial phases

4.1 بناء القدرات/التدريب

هل تم تقديم التدريب لمستخدمي الأراضي / الأطراف المعنيين الآخرين؟:

نعم

حدد من تم تدريبه:

• مستخدمو الأراضي
• موظفون ميدانيون/ مستشارون

إذا كان ذلك على صلة، حدد الجنس والعمر والوضع والعرق وما إلى ذلك.

Provided participation of the male and female during the training process

شكل التدريب:

• في العمل
• من مزارع إلى مزارع
• اجتماعات عامة

المواضيع المغطاة:

Grant allocation mechanisms. Fund flow arrangements, management and technical

التعليقات:

Trainings included such king themes; composting, mulching, managing salinization, intercropping on slopes, drip irrigation, low-cost watering techniques, solar greenhouses, drought-resistant crops, bee-keeping, mixed fruit orchards, local varieties nurseries, rotational grazing, Livestock breeding and maintaining, strategic watering points, use of perennial forage, solar energy technologies, marketing options and opportunities,

4.2 خدمة استشارية

هل يملك مستخدمو الأراضي وصولا إلى خدمة استشارية؟:

نعم

حدد ما إذا كانت الخدمة الاستشارية متوفرة:

• في حقول مستخدمي الأراضي
• في مراكز دائمة

وصف/تعليقات:

Jamoat representatives and also local vet specialists from the district advise them

4.3 تعزيز المؤسسات (التطوير التنظيمي)

هل تم إنشاء أو تعزيز مؤسسات من خلال هذا النهج؟:

• نعم، قليلا

حدد المستوى (المستويات) التي تم فيها تعزيز أو إنشاء المؤسسات:

• محلي

صف المؤسسة والأدوار والمسؤوليات والأعضاء وما إلى ذلك.

The Common Interest Groups formed in the villages on behalf households and enhanced their knowledge. And the project provides small-scale grants at the village level for groups of households (CIG) to implement rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale infrastructure investments. Villages will prioritize investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment, determined by the number of households.

حدد نوع الدعم:

• مالي
• بناء القدرات/التدريب

اعط مزيدا من التفاصيل:

Project-financed grants to CIGs for each investment under categories of rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale infrastructure investments that will not exceed US$7,000 and will require a match of 25% in beneficiary contributions which may be in cash or in-kind

4.4 الرصد والتقييم

هل يشكل الرصد والتقييم جزءا من النهج؟:

كلا

4.5 البحوث

هل كانت البحوث جزءًا من النهج؟:

كلا

5.1 الميزانية السنوية لمكون الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي في النهج المذكور

إذا لم تكن الميزانية السنوية الدقيقة معروفة، قم بالإشارة إلى نطاقها:

• ‏ 10,0000-2,000

التعليقات (على سبيل المثال المصادر الرئيسية للتمويل/الجهات المانحة الرئيسية):

GEF/PPCR through the WB

5.2 الدعم المالي/المادي المقدم لمستخدمي الأراضي

هل حصل مستخدمو الأراضي على دعم مالي/ مادي لتنفيذ التقنية/ التقنيات؟:

نعم

إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم، حدد نوع (أنواع) الدعم والشروط والمزودين:

The project will finance investments in three categories that are expected to improve household assets and sustainable land management, and build climate resilience, examples ofwhich are listed below: (i) Farm Production: field and horticultural crop productivity and diversity (e.g., crop rotations, drought resistant varieties, diversified cropping regimes, community seed funds, low-cost greenhouses), livestock production efficiency (e.g., breed choice, veterinary services), agro-processing and market access;(ii) Land Resource Management: pasture management (e.g., fodder productivity through appropriate species, rotational grazing, watering holes, growing perennials on slopes), watermanagement (e.g., drip irrigation and similar measures, water harvesting), soil fertility (e.g.,composting, mulch crops) integrated pest management (e.g., use of pheromone traps,biological controls) and sustainable sloping lands cultivation (including terracing, inter cropped orchards and woodlots, shelter-belts); and (iii) Small-scale Rural Production Infrastructure: irrigation/drainage system rehabilitation, minor transport infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g., repair of bridges), renewable energy (e.g.,low cost solar energy, and energy efficiency measures (e.g., improved stoves, insulation).Project-financed grants to CIGs for each investment under categories (i), (ii), and (iii) will not exceed US$7,000 and will require a match of 25% in beneficiary contributions which may be in cash or in-kind. Beneficiaries of rural infrastructure investments (category iii above) will have to contribute at least 5% of the total cost in cash at inception. Grants under this subcomponent will be disbursed in tranches directly to beneficiaries or groups to their own bank account with Amonatbank that has branches in most districts.

5.3 إعانات لمدخلات محددة (بما في ذلك العمالة)

• غير موجود

إذا كان العمل من قبل مستخدمي الأراضي مدخلاً جوهريًا، فهل كان:

• تطوعي

التعليقات:

The CIG group contributed more then 25 % from the total subproject/approach

5.4 الائتمان

هل تم توفير ائتمان في إطار نهج أنشطة الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي؟:

كلا

5.5 حوافز أو وسائل أخرى

هل تم استخدام حوافز أو أدوات أخرى لتشجيع تنفيذ تقنيات الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي؟:

كلا

6.1 آثار النهج

6.2 المحفز الرئيسي لقيام مستخدمي الأراضي بتنفيذ الإدارة المستدامة للأراضي

6.3 استدامة أنشطة النهج

هل يمكن لمستخدمي الأراضي المحافظة على استدامة ما تم تنفيذه من خلال النهج (بدون دعم خارجي)؟:

• نعم

إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم، صف كيف:

The CIG head is Isroil Nazarov and an accountant is Hussein Abdurahmonov. They are responsible for the subproject activities implementation, make all their efforts and put their enthusiasm for the successful implementation. While carrying out preventive measures and treatment of farm animals rural people spend their service fees for the purchase of medicines and equipment. In the future, the head of the group is responsible to care of and make the veterinary clinic operation more sustainable.

6.4 نقاط قوة/مزايا النهج

نقاط القوة/ المزايا/ الفرص من وجهة نظر جامع المعلومات أو غيره من الاشخاص الرئيسيين لمصدر المعلومات
High-qualified specialists in the group
Office speace, where they will be able to conduct meetings with the farmers
Required knowledge

6.5 نقاط الضعف/ العيوب في المنهج وطرق التغلب عليها

نقاط الضعف/ المساوىء/ المخاطر من وجهة نظر جامع المعلومات أو غيره من الاشخاص الرئيسيين لمصدر المعلومات	كيف يمكن التغلب عليها؟
Knowledge on the market analysis, fundraising, business planning	They need additional support on capacity building
Support on behalf of the district local government	They need to work more closely with the district and local government
New sources to go ahead	The group needs to come up with the requested letters to the sufficient donors or government funds

7.1 طرق جمع/مصادر المعلومات

7.2 المراجع للمنشورات المتاحة

العنوان، المؤلف، السنة، النظام القياسي الدولي لترقيم الكتب ISBN:

ELMARL Annual Report 2017

متاح من أين؟كم التكلفة؟:

Committee of Environment Protection of RT.

7.3 روابط للمعلومات ذات الصلة المتوفرة على الإنترنت

العنوان/الوصف:

ELMARL documents on SLM Knowledge Management platform

عنوان الرابط URL:

https://slmtj.net