Negotiation between sellers and buyers (AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali)

Grain exchanges (Mali)

Bourses aux céréales (French)

Description

Link up production areas with the areas where grain is consumed in order to encourage the flow of cereals from one area to the other

The objective of grain exchanges is to link up production areas with the areas where grain is consumed in order to encourage the flow of cereals from one area to the other. In this way, the
exchanges contribute to stabilising market prices and informing cereal producers about how these markets function.
The support structure (AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali, a body devolved from the French NGO
Afrique Verte) invites producers and buyers to participate in a two to three-day grain exchange. This process of connecting up parties allows producers to assess grain production levels for the current season and buyers to get an idea of the grain stocks available. The two parties then negotiate grain quantities and prices. A good number of contracts are agreed during the exchange, and the agreement of further contracts after the exchange is likely. The exchange also serves to foster exchange among other actors involved in the sale and production of grain.
Organising exchanges involves several stages: First, supplies are identified in areas with high levels of dry cereal production (millet, sorghum and maize in the Sikasso, Koutiala, Ségou, Senon de Koro/Bankass plains) and rice production (in the Niono rice growing region in the Office du Niger). At the same time, the needs of consumption areas (supply cooperatives in Kayes Region and grain banks in the areas of Gao, Timbuktu and Kidal) and major consumption centres with processing plants, merchants and consumer cooperatives (such as Bamako) are identified. The supply cooperatives from rice-deficit areas (the Kayes area, for example) are identified and their needs recorded (bulk purchasing requests). Producers’ associations in the Niono region in the Office du Niger area are identified and their rice surpluses ascertained. Supplies for sale are then quantified and stockholders are encouraged to put together a bulk sales offer. Finally, a meet-and-greet workshop is held to foster exchange and discussion on grain supply and demand.
Role of stakeholders: AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali catalogues and groups offers (purchase or sale) and cereal requirements during the pre-exchanges, and promotes the exchange among relevant cereal operators (advertising). AMASSA also provides financial and technical support in organising the exchange (venue hire, refreshments). Supply cooperatives and private operators support the process of identifying cereal requirements prior to the exchange and then participate in the exchange itself. Their role is to buy stock. Producers’ associations communicate how much of their stock is available and trade this in bulk at the exchange. The legal advisor helps draw up the sales contracts and explains the content of sales contracts to operators. Others, such as technical partners in the sector (Planning and Statistical Unit of the Ministry of Agriculture, DNSI, OMA, OPAM, Customs Service, EWS, WFP, National Agency for Food Safety and Security, etc.), provide additional specific information.
The transactions carried out in the exchanges are fairly advantageous both for the sellers (producers and their organisations) and the buyers (merchants, supply cooperatives, consumer cooperatives, processing outfits). These advantages can be measured in terms of price and quality. The grain exchanges are prized by many actors and an increasingly large number of structures have built them into their support mechanisms. The farming profession is interested in this approach. For this reason, the exchanges are increasingly being jointly delivered by APCAM and often by the Association of Professional Farming Organisations (AOPP) and projects and/or NGOs. The fact that the farming profession is appropriating the exchange concept bodes well for its sustainability.

Location

Location: Niono, Koutiala, Sévaré-Mopti, Ségou, Kayes, Mali, Mali

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • n.a.

Initiation date: 1995

Year of termination: n.a.

Type of Approach
Cereal samples presentation (AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali)

Approach aims and enabling environment

Main aims / objectives of the approach
The objective of grain exchanges is to link up production areas with the areas where grain is consumed in order to encourage the flow of cereals from one area to the other. In this way, the exchanges contribute to stabilising market prices and informing cereal producers about how these markets function.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: weak link of production areas with the areas where grain is consumed, unstable market prices
Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Other: weak link of production areas with the areas where grain is consumed Treatment through the SLM Approach: The support structure AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali invites producers and buyers to participate in a two to three-day grain exchange. This process of connecting up parties allows producers to assess grain production levels for the current season and buyers to get an idea of the grain stocks available. The two parties then negotiate grain quantities and prices. A good number of contracts are agreed during the exchange, and the agreement of further contracts after the exchange is likely.

Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
What stakeholders / implementing bodies were involved in the Approach? Specify stakeholders Describe roles of stakeholders
local land users/ local communities
SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers
NGO
local government
national government (planners, decision-makers)
Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
none
passive
external support
interactive
self-mobilization
initiation/ motivation
planning
implementation
monitoring/ evaluation
Research
Flow chart

Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology

Decisions were taken by

  • land users alone (self-initiative)
  • mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
  • mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users
  • SLM specialists alone
  • politicians/ leaders

Decisions were made based on

  • evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)
  • research findings
  • personal experience and opinions (undocumented)

Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

The following activities or services have been part of the approach
Capacity building/ training
Training was provided to the following stakeholders
  • land users
  • field staff/ advisers
Form of training
  • on-the-job
  • farmer-to-farmer
  • demonstration areas
  • public meetings
  • courses
Subjects covered

Before each workshop, facilitators from AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali ascertain the grain needs of consumer regions in order to bulk together orders to the different supply cooperatives and grain banks. Likewise, producers’ available grain stocks are ascertained and bulked to build a substantial supply. To ascertain the needs of the parties involved, AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali organises forums in the main production areas called ‘pre-exchanges’. These pre-exchanges are, in effect, regional preparatory meetings where around 80 to 100 people come together to assess the offers available and the approaches for bulking supply and demand.
In addition, facilitators use the pre-exchanges to train organisations in market negotiation techniques, price setting and drawing up sales contracts. An area of particular focus is the content of contracts (delivery deadlines, quality and standards to be delivered, quantities, packaging requirements, etc.) and the consequences of failing to meet the terms of the contract. A series of pre-exchanges are rolled out in different locations.
In practice, the exchanges serve as platforms for information exchange that give operators the opportunity to get up to speed with certain key aspects of the trade. They provide information on the status of cereal production, areas facing food scarcity or economic difficulties, cereal price trends, legislative and regulatory procedures relating to cross-border trade, invitation to tender opportunities for replenishing the National Security Stock (SNS) and sales of intervention stocks. This range of information is essential and enables operators to better position themselves in the grain market.

Advisory service
Advisory service was provided
  • on land users' fields
  • at permanent centres
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities
Institution strengthening
Institutions have been strengthened / established
  • no
  • yes, a little
  • yes, moderately
  • yes, greatly
at the following level
  • local
  • regional
  • national
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.
Type of support
  • financial
  • capacity building/ training
  • equipment
Further details
Monitoring and evaluation
economic / production aspects were regular monitored by project staff, land users through measurements management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by project staff, land users through observations There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation
Research
Research treated the following topics
  • sociology
  • economics / marketing
  • ecology
  • technology

Financing and external material support

Annual budget in USD for the SLM component
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.a.
Approach costs were met by the following donors: national non-government: 100.0%
The following services or incentives have been provided to land users
  • Financial/ material support provided to land users
  • Subsidies for specific inputs
  • Credit
  • Other incentives or instruments

Impact analysis and concluding statements

Impacts of the Approach
No
Yes, little
Yes, moderately
Yes, greatly
Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?

Product quality improves and becomes more standardised

Did the Approach empower socially and economically disadvantaged groups?

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?

AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali began operations in Mali in 1994 and the first exchanges took place in 1995. AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali organises several exchanges each year in Mali: One exchange in Niono to supply Kayes Region and urban centres like Bamako with rice from the surplus area of Office du Niger. This exchange only involves parties interested in trading rice. One exchange in Koutiala in South Mali to supply regions in the north of Mali (Gao, Timbuktu and Mopti) and major consumption centres in Bamako with dry cereals (particularly maize, millet and sorghum derived from the surplus area of Sikasso). One exchange in Sévaré-Mopti to supply regions in the north of Mali (Gao, Timbuktu and Mopti) with dry cereals (particularly millet and sorghum derived from the surplus area of the Séno de Koro plains). One national exchange in Ségou involving all national cereal operators (producers, farmer organisations, cereal processing plants, cereal merchants, logistics companies, institutional market structures and technical partners). This exchange involves all tradable cereals (rice, millet, sorghum, maize, fonio and others). Two regional exchanges within the Kayes region (Kita and Diéma). These exchanges enable deficit areas to source dry cereals regionally in Kita and Diéma. Kita and Diéma are considered surplus areas in the Kayes region. One international exchange that involves several countries. The last international exchange was organised on 13 and 14 December 2011 in Bamako with nine ECOWAS countries participating. The exchange resulted in the sale of 50,000 tonnes of grain for more than 8 billion CFA francs. The international exchange involves 200 participants and the trading of 50,000 tonnes of grain between cereal operators from participating countries. The exchanges are increasingly being jointly delivered by APCAM and often by the Association of Professional Farming Organisations (AOPP) and projects and/or NGOs. Grain exchanges have attracted the interest of many actors in the cereals sector. Interest is so high that a host of organisations have expressed the desire to hold their own grain exchanges (e.g. chambers of agriculture, cereals sector support projects and programmes, decentralised authorities).

Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
  • increased production
  • increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio
  • reduced land degradation
  • reduced risk of disasters
  • reduced workload
  • payments/ subsidies
  • rules and regulations (fines)/ enforcement
  • prestige, social pressure/ social cohesion
  • affiliation to movement/ project/ group/ networks
  • environmental consciousness
  • customs and beliefs, morals
  • enhanced SLM knowledge and skills
  • aesthetic improvement
  • conflict mitigation
Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what hat been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
  • no
  • yes
  • uncertain

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • The exchanges help producers and consumers agree preferential prices without the need for intermediaries with the aim of reducing the cost of cereals in consumer areas and increasing it in production areas. Product quality improves and becomes more standardised, regular interaction increases client loyalty, and there is greater structuring of producers and consumers. For
    example, the apex organisations in Niono (20 rice grower organisations collectively called ‘Jèka Feeré’) and in Yalimenané (28 supply cooperatives collectively called ‘Supunu Kafô’) have been set up as a result of the exchange system. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Successful exchanges require: 1) the organisation of producers and buyers to increase supply and demand; 2) bulk purchasing approaches to secure lower prices; 3) the formalisation of purchase contracts and cereal logistics; 4) the origins of merchandise to be traceable; 5) contractual agreements to be respected in terms of quality, payment methods and deadlines, delivery deadlines and methods, etc.)
  • The exchanges enable people working in the sector get to know the main challenges in trading cereals. They therefore constitute a suitable framework for advocacy activities (advocacy platform) where actors involved in the sector have the opportunity to communicate directly with leading figures in the sector and to defend their interests in terms of the production and sale of cereals.
  • grain exchanges have attracted the interest of many actors in the cereals sector. Interest is so high that a host of organisations have expressed the desire to hold their own grain exchanges (e.g. chambers of agriculture, cereals sector support projects and programmes, decentralised authorities). Currently, exchanges – in particular, the national grain exchange –
    are jointly delivered by AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali and the Permanent Assembly of the Mali Chambers of Agriculture (APCAM). (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: The critical factor in making these exchanges genuinely successful is ensuring their sustainability, i.e. ensuring that their main beneficiaries (producer organisations, processing outfits, cooperatives, grain banks, merchants and animal food manufacturers) take financial and political ownership of the exchanges. Beneficiaries across the board recognise that the tool is useful and necessary. But how, with what means and when will these parties take over the organisation of exchanges and cover all the costs involved (organisation, facilitation, technical support)?
    It remains to be seen how these actors will be able to take on this responsibility in the short or medium term given the frequently low incomes among producer organisations, and particularly among those in rice-deficit areas. On the other hand, it is certainly possible over the medium term to maintain partial ownership and to foster a gradual shift towards ownership by producer organisations and operators through the progressive increase of their contributions. Setting up partnerships involving support for organisations and programmes operating in the sector is also a viable option. The sustainability of this approach depends on it being fully appropriated by the beneficiaries themselves, so that AMASSA – Afrique Verte Mali becomes merely a provider of technical know-how.)
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • a certain level of expertise is required to organise and run the exchanges in a way which ensures they deliver all their desired outcomes

References

Compiler
  • Dieter Nill
Editors
Reviewer
  • Laura Ebneter
Date of documentation: Sept. 24, 2014
Last update: June 21, 2017
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Manual of Good Practices in Small Scale Irrigation in the Sahel. Experiences from Mali. Published by GIZ in 2014.: http://star-www.giz.de/starweb/giz/pub/servlet.starweb
  • Afrique Verte activity reports:
  • Find out more at: www.afriqueverte.org:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International