Arid environment around Shaartuz with interspersed Saxaul bushes (Julie Zähringer (PPCR Component A5, 131 Rudaki Avenue, Dushanbe))

Saxaul plantation for stabilisation of sandy soils (Tajikistan)

Description

Saxaul (Haloxylon ammodendron) bushes are planted on denuded sandy soils with the aim to reduce the rate of desertification.

On 15 ha of denuded land, prone to wind erosion the Saxaul bush (Haloxylon ammodendron) which is native to Central Asia was planted in order to stabilise the soils and halt desertification. Over two years 25 ha of Saxaul plantation was established through natural spreading of the plant. The idea came from UNDP who also funded the purchase of seeds, fuel and fertilisers. UNDP further conducted an awareness raising campaign among local land users and members of dekhkan farms about the role of Saxaul bushes in combating land degradation and techniques of planting Saxaul plantations.

Purpose of the Technology: The Shaartuz area has repeatedly suffered from droughts, and the natural vegetation cover is highly degraded due to overexploitation for firewood. This renders the sandy soils very susceptible to wind erosion. Saxaul plantations have been widely applied in other arid areas of Central Asia to combat desertification, and were selected as an appropriate method for soil fixation around Shaartuz.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Saxaul seeds have to be collected in November, and need to be planted immediately, as otherwise they lose their viability. A tractor was used to plough the land, and the seeds were planted manually. 15 ha of plantation were planted in one single day. As they are not irrigated in this area, the Saxaul bushes are entirely dependent on winter rain and dew for their water supply. The trees grow slowly and need protection from roaming cattle. As the forestry department (leskhoz) responsible for the protection of the plantation has no guards, the project employed a local forester from the Jamoat to protect the area. Meetings were held with surrounding villages to discuss the risk of wind erosion, and the need for the plantations. Also a mobile theatre was involved in order to raise the public awareness with regards to deforestation and desertification issues. An agreement was achieved with the local residents to help protect the newly planted trees from cattle.

Natural / human environment: Saxaul plantations improve vegetation cover, and therefore also increase water infiltration into the soil and improve soil structure. Once the soil has stabilised with the help of the Saxaul bushes, other herbs and bushes will regenerate in the area, and reinforce the vegetation cover. Moreover, different wild animals and birds are already nesting in the area as the vegetation increases.

Location

Location: Jura Nazarov Jamoat, Shaartuz, Khatlon, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 68.0655, 37.07

Spread of the Technology:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Saxaul bush (Julie Zähringer (PPCR Component A5, 131 Rudaki Avenue, Dushanbe))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Grazing land - Extensive grazing land: Semi-nomadism/ pastoralism
  • Forest/ woodlands - Products and services: Nature conservation/ protection

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Number of growing seasons per year: 1
Land use before implementation of the Technology: Grazing land: Ge: Extensive grazing land
Livestock density: n.a.

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil, Ed: deflation and deposition
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bh: loss of habitats, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
SLM group
  • windbreak/ shelterbelt
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • improved plant varieties/ animal breeds
SLM measures
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Author: Julie Zaehringer, Baumackerstr. 51, 8050 Zuerich
Saxaul seeds are planted in parallel rows, with 15 m spacing between each row. The interval between seeds within each row is 1m.

Location: Jura Nazarov Jamoat. Shaartuz, Khatlon

Date: 27.05.2011

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low

Technical knowledge required for land users: low

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides)

Secondary technical functions: increase of infiltration, reduction in wind speed, increase of biomass (quantity)

Aligned: -linear
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 667
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 15
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 1

Trees/ shrubs species: Saxaul (Haloxylon ammodendron)

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Somoni
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4.5 Somoni
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5.50
Most important factors affecting the costs
For this technology, costs are related to the use of a tractor for planting of seeds and for the purchase of seeds and fertiliser. As the plantation was implemented by the forestry agency, labour used was provided by current employees of the agency.
Establishment activities
  1. Collect Saxaul seeds (Timing/ frequency: November)
  2. Plant seeds using tractor with automated seed planter (Timing/ frequency: December)
  3. Application of carbamide fertiliser once after planting seeds (Timing/ frequency: December)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Collect Saxaul seeds Persons/day 16.0 20.0 320.0 100.0
Equipment
Tractor for seed planting Persons/day 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Fuel ha 15.0 6.666666 100.0
Plant material
Seeds kg 13.0 15.0 195.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer kg 3.3 2.42424242 8.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 723.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Protection of plantation from roaming cattle by local forestry employee (Timing/ frequency: ongoing)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Somoni) Total costs per input (Somoni) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Protection of plantation from cattle ha/month 15.0 16.666667 250.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 250.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 100.0
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased


Loss of grazing land due to restricted access, however, land was already degraded.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased


Fertilisers are needed during the establishment phase

workload
increased
decreased


A guard is needed to protect the plantation all day long from roaming cattle.

Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
evaporation
increased
decreased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil loss
increased
decreased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
increased


provides a habitat for a bird species that are dependent on the tree (Passer ammodendri)

wind velocity
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
wind transported sediments
increased
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
NA
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Effective fixation of sandy soils, protecting them from wind storms and preventing erosion.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Increase plantation areas in the region
  • Use of native tree species which are very well adapted to arid ecosystems
  • Through the plantation of Saxaul, the establishment of other plant species follows on naturally.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Decline of areas suitable for cattle grazing Developing a management plan which could include restricted user rights for cattle grazing
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The plantation only has protective function, but there is no aim to introduce a sustainable management scheme which would allow for the extraction of firewood. Develop a management plan
  • The area covered by the plantation is very small so the impacts might be minimal. Increase the plantation area

References

Compiler
  • Firdavs Faizulloev
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • David Streiff
Date of documentation: April 27, 2011
Last update: July 22, 2017
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International