Joint pasture mapping. In the course of the awareness building workshop the Pasture Committees learn the basic skills necessary for pasture management (Isakov Azamat (Kuibyshev village, Naryn oblast))

Joint pasture management (Kyrgyzstan)

Central Asian Countries Initiative on Land Management. (CACILM/ИСЦАУЗР)

Description

The aim of this approach is the joint management of pastures t by considering opinions of pasture users with the view of prevention and mitigation of pasture degradation and an improvement in the living conditions of local communities (in the frame of CACILM).

Aims / objectives: Resolution of the degradation and erosion-related problems through sustainable community-based pasture management. The suggested approach is based on the participation of the local population in pasture management by imposing responsibilities on them for the safekeeping and preserving of pastures. A selected part of this approach concerning the development of pasture use plans, was described in a separate approach called “Joint pasture use planning” (WOCAT QAKYR002e)

Methods: Until the adoption of the law “On pastures” in 2009, the responsibilities were shared in the following ways: the oblast state administrations were responsible for the remote pastures; the rayon administrations for intensive pastures; and the village administrations for the near-to-village pastures. After the law’s adoption in 2009, all the authority pertaining to pasture management of all categories was delegated to the bodies of local self-government. In turn, they delegated their pasture management authority to the Pasture Users Associations (PUA), represented by the Pasture Committees. This law became a key factor in the implementation of this approach

Stages of implementation: Implementation of the approach was started by conducting a baseline survey in the pilot territory by the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research NCCR North-South. 2) Moderators of the public foundation CAMP Ala-Too conducted L4S (learning for sustainability) workshops for pasture users. 3) The outcome of the workshops conducted was the formation of the initiative group to create the PUA. 4) The initiative group dealt with the legalization of this institution, and, as a result, the PUA was established along with its executive body, the Pasture Committee, which develops pasture management plans. 5) Currently, the Pasture Committees monitor the pasture state, the outcomes of which must serve as the basis for the development of a pasture management plan in future

Role of stakeholders: 1. The project “Sustainable pasture management within the river basins of Jergetal and Onarcha”: The joint pasture management approach was implemented within the framework of this project. 2) PF CAMP Ala-Too: executor of the project. 3) Local self-government bodies have delegated the pasture management rights to the PUAs, which allowed them to fully implement the approach. 4) As per the legislation “On pastures”, local communities have the right to establish PUAs with their representative bodies, Pasture Committees. 5) The Pasture Department of the Ministry of Agriculture has ensured support from the Oblast Pasture Department. 6) Experts from the Rural Advisory Service and the Agency for Rural Development and Investment have been trained on separate components of the approach to be disseminated throughout the whole country

Other important information: This approach was implemented by PF CAMP Ala-Too within the framework of the regional program “Sustainable use of natural resources in Central Asia”, implemented by GIZ

Location

Location: Naryn, Naryn, Kyrgyzstan

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 76.002, 41.0

Initiation date: 2008

Year of termination: 2011

Type of Approach
Joint pasture mapping. In the course of the awareness building workshop the Pasture Committees learn the basic skills necessary for pasture management (Isakov Azamat (Kuibyshev village, Naryn oblast))
The joint sustainable pasture management approach. The approach considers ecological, economic and social aspects, which stipulate sustainability of the approach (Ute-Fisher Zuikov (Bishkek))

Approach aims and enabling environment

Main aims / objectives of the approach
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (The baseline survey; awareness building; establishment of local institutes responsible for pasture management; monitoring of pastures; elaboration of pasture use plans; elaboration of pasture management plans)

Decrease in the degradation and erosion of pastures, and improvement of the living conditions of local communities through sustainable community-based pasture management

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Pasture degradation was a problem because sustainable pasture management was impossible to implement due to the three-level pasture management system.
Conditions enabling the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights greatly helped the approach implementation: This approach corresponds fully to existing legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic.
Conditions hindering the implementation of the Technology/ ies applied under the Approach
  • Social/ cultural/ religious norms and values: Lack of experience on the part of local communities in managing natural resources. They were not involved in the process earlier. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Increased awareness among the population through workshops and meetings about the processes of the decentralization of the management of natural resources and its importance for local communities
  • Availability/ access to financial resources and services: Financial basis for implementation of this approach is fee payment for livestock grazing by pasture users. Pasture users do not always pay for pasture tickets. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Provision of transparency of the Pasture Committee’s budget through reporting at the meetings; demonstration of effective activity of the Pasture Committee through improvement of the state and infrastructure of the pastures.
  • Legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights): Old Law \'On pasture\' does not ensure sustainabe pasture management Treatment through the SLM Approach: Adoption a new Law \'On pasture\' in 2009.
  • Knowledge about SLM, access to technical support: However, it should be noted that the Pasture Committee’s members are common villagers and they do not have the capacity to implement the objectives stated in the law “On pastures”. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Approach provides training activities for Pasture Committee members on pasture monitoring; pasture use planning; development of pasture management plans; cost calculation of the pasture tickets. The training courses were conducted by CAMP Ala-Too

Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
What stakeholders / implementing bodies were involved in the Approach? Specify stakeholders Describe roles of stakeholders
community-based organizations Pasture users participated in all stages of the approach realization Pasture users and shepherds are traditionally men The difference between participation of men and women is not a consequence of gender discrimination. Historically, it was the man that was responsible for the livestock. However, if they so desire, women are able to participate on an equal basis with the men. Members of the Pasture Committees represent all layers of the population (small, medium and large). Correspondingly, they participate in development of pasture use plan and can stand up for their rights. Implementation of the approach
SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers The Rural Advisory Services (RAS) took part in dissemination of this approach
NGO Public Foundation САМР Ala-Too Elaboration of the approach
national government (planners, decision-makers) Part of the approach was incorporated in the Manual on Designing of Pasture Management Plans for Pasture Committees, approved by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Kyrgyz Republic
international organization
Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
none
passive
external support
interactive
self-mobilization
initiation/ motivation
Increase awareness of pasture users through workshops, round tables and meetings with specialists
planning
Each stage of the approach was discussed with the local communities and decisions were taken jointly
implementation
The Pasture Committee participated in all stages of implementation of the approach
monitoring/ evaluation
The Pasture Committee monitored the execution of the pasture use plans on a quarterly basis and pasture management plans once a year.
Research
The baseline survey and collection of primary data was done by the specialists together with the pasture users.
Flow chart

The approach on sustainable pasture management

Author: Public Foundation САМР Ala-Too (36 Oshskaya St, Bishkek city)
Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology

Decisions were taken by

  • land users alone (self-initiative)
  • mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
  • mainly SLM specialists, following consultation with land users
  • SLM specialists alone
  • politicians/ leaders

Decisions were made based on

  • evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)
  • research findings
  • personal experience and opinions (undocumented)

Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

The following activities or services have been part of the approach
Capacity building/ training
Training was provided to the following stakeholders
  • land users
  • field staff/ advisers
Form of training
  • on-the-job
  • farmer-to-farmer
  • demonstration areas
  • public meetings
  • courses
  • Workshops
Subjects covered

Training of trainers and training on this approach was conducted for pasture users from the pilot region by the local advisory services. The approach includes creating awareness; training on pasture monitoring; pasture use planning; calculation of budget for pasture management plan and the cost of pasture tickets.

Advisory service
Advisory service was provided
  • on land users' fields
  • at permanent centres

Institution strengthening
Institutions have been strengthened / established
  • no
  • yes, a little
  • yes, moderately
  • yes, greatly
at the following level
  • local
  • regional
  • national
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.
Type of support
  • financial
  • capacity building/ training
  • equipment
Further details
All meetings and workshops were financed by the project. All the equipment and tools, which were necessary for the Pasture Committees, were also provided by the Project.
Monitoring and evaluation
Bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements; indicators: Dynamics of biophysical changes (monitoring of the pastures’ state) Technical aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: % of the observance of the grazing schedule and pasture use plan (monitoring) Economic / production aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements; indicators: Cattle condition No. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements; indicators: % of the involved pasture users Management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements; indicators: Number of Pasture Committees applying this approach There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation
Research
Research treated the following topics
  • sociology
  • economics / marketing
  • ecology
  • technology

Within the baseline survey in the pilot territories, which was conducted by the Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research NCCR North-South, the background socio-economic and ecological situations were explored and analysed

Research was carried out both on station and on-farm

Financing and external material support

Annual budget in USD for the SLM component
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: n.a.
Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (The approach was implemented at the expense of GIZ): 100.0%
The following services or incentives have been provided to land users
  • Financial/ material support provided to land users
  • Subsidies for specific inputs
  • Credit
  • Other incentives or instruments

Impact analysis and concluding statements

Impacts of the Approach
No
Yes, little
Yes, moderately
Yes, greatly
Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?

Introduction of this approach facilitated the improvement of 250000 ha of pastures in the pilot territory; reduction of the pasture pressure by conflict management between the pasture users.

Did the Approach empower socially and economically disadvantaged groups?

Poor segments of the population along with others have access to all categories of pastures.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?

The World Bank “Agricultural Investment Services Project”, component “pasture management”. Within the framework of this project, a manual for Pasture Committees on development of pasture management plans was designed for the use of this approach. All 454 Pasture Committees of the Kyrgyz Republic work according to this manual.

Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
  • increased production
  • increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio
  • reduced land degradation
  • reduced risk of disasters
  • reduced workload
  • payments/ subsidies
  • rules and regulations (fines)/ enforcement
  • prestige, social pressure/ social cohesion
  • affiliation to movement/ project/ group/ networks
  • environmental consciousness
  • customs and beliefs, morals
  • enhanced SLM knowledge and skills
  • aesthetic improvement
  • conflict mitigation
  • environmental consciousness, moral, health
Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what hat been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
  • no
  • yes
  • uncertain

The approach foresees the establishment of Pasture Committees – institutes, which are responsible for pasture management at the local level. The funding mechanism of these institutes is stipulated by legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic and is based on fees paid by the pasture users for livestock grazing. These payments form the budget of the Pasture Committee.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Introduction of payment for pasture use (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Ensure advisory services for Pasture Committees)
  • Achievement of stable income from livestock breeding
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Capability of the local population to plan pasture management and make budgets for the Pasture Committee (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Provision of transparency of the budget of the Pasture Committee)
  • Reduction and prevention of pasture degradation, preservation and rehabilitation of pasture ecosystem (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Increase the of capacity of the Pasture Committee)
  • Involvement of the local community in the management of natural resources, which can enhance their responsibilities for these resources(How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Attract as many people as possible)
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Implementation of the approach requires certain skills and capacities, which the Pasture Committees lack By conducting capacity building training for Pasture Committees.
  • For implementation of this approach, background materials and data are needed (for example, information about the pasture area, pasture maps, etc.) The Pasture Committees can buy needed materials from KyrgyzGiproZem.

References

Compiler
  • Azamat Isakov
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • David Streiff
Date of documentation: Dec. 16, 2011
Last update: Aug. 17, 2017
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Kulov S. 2007: Total Economic Valuation of Kyrgyzstan Pastoralism, World Initiativ for Sustainable Pastoralism, Global Environmental Facility, UNDP, IUCN.: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/nonfao/lead/x6400r/x6400r00.pdfwww.toktom.kgwww.camp.kg
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International