mulched-grapes
(Egypt)
covered-grapes
Description
old grape tree (30 years old) grow under drip irrigation, each plant have 4 dripper with discharge about 2L/hr. plant grow on terraces which covered with plant residues at November to reduce water evaporation and for weed control. grape trees covered with plastic sheet for early production. control of plant diseases is doing under specific regulation for importation
the technology applied in frames and are related to nature and human environment that there are about 200 permanent agriculture engineers and managers control and about 500-4000 temporal workers depends on the time of the season , this technology applied only for grapes grown under drip irrigation, where terraces covered with plant residues and the trees covered with plastic sheet like plastic tunnels. the purpose of the technology are to reduce water evaporation, minimize GHGs, weed control, early production, controlling salinity, increase soil fertility and may be to increase soil carbon biomass. the major activities are covered plant with plastic sheet and covered the soil with rice straw and with the crushed pruned grapes branches, hence the inputs are plastic sheet, rice straw residues, pruned grapes branches, irrigation and fertigation system, this technology can play good role in minimizing water requirements, increase fertilizer use efficiency, increase grapes quality for importation and improvement of soil properties. this technology is good for obtain high quality for grapes but have high costs for establishment and maintaining.
Location
Location: Egypt
No. of Technology sites analysed: single site
Geo-reference of selected sites
Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)
Date of implementation: 1986; 10-50 years ago
Type of introduction
-
through land users' innovation
-
as part of a traditional system (> 50 years)
-
during experiments/ research
-
through projects/ external interventions
(Ahmed )
Classification of the Technology
Main purpose
-
improve production
-
reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
-
conserve ecosystem
-
protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
-
preserve/ improve biodiversity
-
reduce risk of disasters
-
adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
-
mitigate climate change and its impacts
-
create beneficial economic impact
-
create beneficial social impact
Land use
-
Cropland - Tree and shrub cropping
Water supply
-
rainfed
-
mixed rainfed-irrigated
-
full irrigation
Number of growing seasons per year:
1
Land use before implementation of the Technology:
n.a.
Livestock density:
n.a.
Purpose related to land degradation
-
prevent land degradation
-
reduce land degradation
-
restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
-
adapt to land degradation
-
not applicable
Degradation addressed
-
chemical soil deterioration - Cs: salinization/ alkalinization
-
physical soil deterioration -
-
water degradation - Hq: decline of groundwater quality
SLM group
-
minimal soil disturbance
-
integrated soil fertility management
-
integrated pest and disease management (incl. organic agriculture)
SLM measures
-
agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility, A3: Soil surface treatment, A4: Subsurface treatment
-
vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
-
structural measures - S1: Terraces
-
management measures - M2: Change of management/ intensity level, M3: Layout according to natural and human environment, M6: Waste management (recycling, re-use or reduce)
Technical drawing
Technical specifications
terraces: height 0.4 m , width 1 m
spacing between terraces =3 m
distance between plant on the same terraces = 3 m
Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs
Calculation of inputs and costs
- Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 4200 m2)
- Currency used for cost calculation: US Dollars
- Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 25000.0
- Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 50
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
-
pruning (Timing/ frequency: November)
-
mulching (Timing/ frequency: November)
-
irrigation (Timing/ frequency: November-November)
-
fertilization (Timing/ frequency: November-Apri)
-
pest control (Timing/ frequency: January to April)
-
Terraces maintenance (Timing/ frequency: November)
-
Covering with plastic sheet (Timing/ frequency: December)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 4200 m2)
Specify input |
Unit |
Quantity |
Costs per Unit (US Dollars) |
Total costs per input (US Dollars) |
% of costs borne by land users |
Labour
|
pruning |
USD |
5.0 |
5.0 |
25.0 |
100.0 |
Mulching |
USD |
2.0 |
5.0 |
10.0 |
100.0 |
covering with plastic sheet |
USD |
10.0 |
5.0 |
50.0 |
100.0 |
irrigation |
USD |
15.0 |
5.0 |
75.0 |
100.0 |
Equipment
|
irrigation system |
USD |
1.0 |
2500.0 |
2500.0 |
100.0 |
Plant material
|
seedling |
USD |
500.0 |
0.75 |
375.0 |
100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides
|
NPK |
USD |
30.0 |
20.0 |
600.0 |
97.0 |
humic |
usd |
2.0 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
100.0 |
Construction material
|
|
usd |
|
|
|
|
Total costs for establishment of the Technology |
3'655.0 |
|
Maintenance activities
-
irrigation (Timing/ frequency: 15)
-
fertigation (Timing/ frequency: 112)
Natural environment
Average annual rainfall
-
< 250 mm
-
251-500 mm
-
501-750 mm
-
751-1,000 mm
-
1,001-1,500 mm
-
1,501-2,000 mm
-
2,001-3,000 mm
-
3,001-4,000 mm
-
> 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
-
humid
-
sub-humid
-
semi-arid
-
arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
-
flat (0-2%)
-
gentle (3-5%)
-
moderate (6-10%)
-
rolling (11-15%)
-
hilly (16-30%)
-
steep (31-60%)
-
very steep (>60%)
Landforms
-
plateau/plains
-
ridges
-
mountain slopes
-
hill slopes
-
footslopes
-
valley floors
Altitude
-
0-100 m a.s.l.
-
101-500 m a.s.l.
-
501-1,000 m a.s.l.
-
1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
-
1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
-
2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
-
2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
-
3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
-
> 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
-
convex situations
-
concave situations
-
not relevant
Soil depth
-
very shallow (0-20 cm)
-
shallow (21-50 cm)
-
moderately deep (51-80 cm)
-
deep (81-120 cm)
-
very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
-
coarse/ light (sandy)
-
medium (loamy, silty)
-
fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
-
coarse/ light (sandy)
-
medium (loamy, silty)
-
fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
-
high (>3%)
-
medium (1-3%)
-
low (<1%)
Groundwater table
-
on surface
-
< 5 m
-
5-50 m
-
> 50 m
Availability of surface water
-
excess
-
good
-
medium
-
poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
-
good drinking water
-
poor drinking water (treatment required)
-
for agricultural use only (irrigation)
-
unusable
Is salinity a problem?
Occurrence of flooding
Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation
-
subsistence (self-supply)
-
mixed (subsistence/ commercial
-
commercial/ market
Off-farm income
-
less than 10% of all income
-
10-50% of all income
-
> 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
-
very poor
-
poor
-
average
-
rich
-
very rich
Level of mechanization
-
manual work
-
animal traction
-
mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
-
Sedentary
-
Semi-nomadic
-
Nomadic
Individuals or groups
-
individual/ household
-
groups/ community
-
cooperative
-
employee (company, government)
Age
-
children
-
youth
-
middle-aged
-
elderly
Area used per household
-
< 0.5 ha
-
0.5-1 ha
-
1-2 ha
-
2-5 ha
-
5-15 ha
-
15-50 ha
-
50-100 ha
-
100-500 ha
-
500-1,000 ha
-
1,000-10,000 ha
-
> 10,000 ha
Scale
-
small-scale
-
medium-scale
-
large-scale
Land ownership
-
state
-
company
-
communal/ village
-
group
-
individual, not titled
-
individual, titled
Land use rights
-
open access (unorganized)
-
communal (organized)
-
leased
-
individual
Water use rights
-
open access (unorganized)
-
communal (organized)
-
leased
-
individual
Access to services and infrastructure
Cost-benefit analysis
Benefits compared with establishment costs
Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Adoption and adaptation
Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
-
single cases/ experimental
-
1-10%
-
10-50%
-
more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
-
0-10%
-
10-50%
-
50-90%
-
90-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
To which changing conditions?
-
climatic change/ extremes
-
changing markets
-
labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
Conclusions and lessons learnt
Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
References
Reviewer
-
Deborah Niggli
-
Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: Nov. 29, 2017
Last update: Aug. 19, 2024
Resource persons
-
Ahmed Abd El-All (Agriahmed@yaoo.com) - None
Full description in the WOCAT database
Documentation was faciliated by