Photo showing multi-purpose tree species for supplementing animal pasture in Northern Uganda (Issa Aliga)

Multi-Purpose Tree Species for Pasture Supplementation (Uganda)

pito yat ma lee chamo

Description

Multi-purpose tree species such as Calliandra calothyrsus are planted on farmstead to improve pastures for soil fertility improvement and livestock production

Livestock keepers in Northern Uganda face challenges of obtaining pasture for their animals due to land fragmentation, conflicts and bush burning. Cattle keepers in Nwoya District now plant multi-purpose trees to enrich the existing livestock pastures with the aim of increasing productivity per unit area of available land.
Multi-purpose tree seedlings, cuttings or seeds such as Calliandra calothyrsus are planted in natural pasture land at a spacing of about 8m x 8m. Depending on the shape of the trees, the spacing can be wider or narrower. The growing trees are caged during the first year of growth to prevent the animals from feeding on them and ensure proper establishment. In the following year after planting, trees can be used for feeding the livestock. In the first 3 years, the tree leaves can be cut and carried to the livestock as the trees are still tender and susceptible to overgrazing. Thereafter, trees can be directly browsed by the animals until a period when trees will have grown higher than the animals can reach; then again leaves are cut and carried to the livestock or pruned to a suitable height.
The trees produce nutritious leaves, among other products, used as livestock feed to supplement animal pasture. Furthermore, the trees provide shade for the animals during hot days. The leguminous trees bear vegetation rich in protein content, are evergreen and produce leaves throughout the year, hence, serve as an important source of feed during dry season when grass is dry or burnt. Animals produce good quality manure that can be used for improving soil fertility. The availability of leguminous trees in the pasture land also prevents overgrazing of the grass and therefore, incidences of soil erosion is minimized.

Location

Location: Gulu District, Northern Region,Uganda, Uganda

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 32.34512, 2.75856

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

Date of implementation: 2008

Type of introduction
Photo showing cattle browsing under multipurpose trees to improve pastures for soil fertility improvement and livestock production (Aliga Issa)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Grazing land - other (specify): tethering domestic animals
    Main animal species and products: Cattle, goats and sheep
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Land use before implementation of the Technology: n.a.
Livestock density: 8 animals kept near the homestead
Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • soil erosion by wind - Et: loss of topsoil
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Ps: subsidence of organic soils, settling of soil
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bh: loss of habitats, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
SLM group
  • pastoralism and grazing land management
  • integrated crop-livestock management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Author: Sunday Balla
Trees are planted at a spacing of about 8 m x 8 m in the grazing land on a gentle sloping area

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 acre of grazing land)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Uganda shillings
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3600.0 Uganda shillings
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 5000
Most important factors affecting the costs
Labour for planting
Establishment activities
  1. Sourcing seed of multipurpose trees (Timing/ frequency: dry season)
  2. Digging the holes for planting (Timing/ frequency: onset of rains)
  3. Planting seeds (Timing/ frequency: early rainy season)
  4. Protecting young trees from destruction (Timing/ frequency: during growth periods)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 acre of grazing land)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Uganda shillings) Total costs per input (Uganda shillings) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Personnel persondays 4.0 5000.0 20000.0 100.0
Equipment
Hand hoe pieces 1.0 10000.0 10000.0 100.0
Tape measure pieces 1.0 5000.0 5000.0 100.0
Plant material
Seeds kg 0.5 40000.0 20000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 55'000.0
Maintenance activities
n.a.

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 1000.0
Name of the meteorological station: Gulu meteorological station
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
  • for grazing area
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
x
increased


Animal have enough feed

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased


Leguminous multi-purpose tree leaves have high protein content

animal production
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 4
Quantity after SLM: 6

wood production
decreased
x
increased


Trees branches used as firewood

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased


Usually higher production

land management
hindered
x
simplified


Reduced erosion and trampling

farm income
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 3litre/day
Quantity after SLM: 5litre/day
Higher milk production during peak of lactation.

workload
increased
x
decreased


The time / workload to activily graze animals is reduced due to the presence of trees

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved


Increased milk production

health situation
worsened
x
improved


Through increased consumption of milk

land use/ water rights
worsened
x
improved


Farmers learned how to manage their land in a proper way

national institutions
weakened
x
strengthened


Institution of research and policy uses information from farmers about multi-purpose trees

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved


Animals used to destroy other people's fields looking for pasture

Ecological impacts
soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


Leaves act as mulch on the soil surface thus retaining water. Leaves increase humus thus increasing the water holding capacity of soil

soil cover
reduced
x
improved


Tree canopy and fallen leaves improves soil cover.

soil loss
increased
x
decreased


Reduced surface runoff which causes soil loss

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced


soil surface is covered with decomposing leaves hence reduces sealing.

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced


Reduced grazing reduces soil compaction by animals

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased


Tree roots bring to surface leached nutrients

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


Tree leaves and roots decompose to add organic matter to soil

acidity
increased
x
reduced


humus reduces soil acidity

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased


Grass and trees presence increased

drought impacts
increased
x
decreased


Trees are ever green even during dry periods when pasture are burnt or dried up

wind velocity
increased
x
decreased


Trees act as wind breaks

micro-climate
worsened
x
improved


Trees act as shade for livestock

Off-site impacts
groundwater/ river pollution
increased
x
reduced


Trees cover reduce surface runoff which carries pollutants such as animal dung into water sources. Leaves help filtering ground water.

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
x
reduced


Less livestock movement / trampling on neighbouting fields

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Season: dry season
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • more than 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • It is cheap to establish
  • Does not require maintenance
  • Produces pasture throughout the year
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Produces good quality pasture high in protein content
  • Animals produce good quality manure which can be applied in crop fields
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Trees take almost a year to grow and able to be used for feeding animals
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome

References

Compiler
  • Sunday Balla Amale
Editors
  • JOY TUKAHIRWA
  • Kamugisha Rick Nelson
Reviewer
  • John Stephen Tenywa
  • Udo Höggel
Date of documentation: Dec. 19, 2017
Last update: Feb. 11, 2020
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Feedipedia: https://www.feedipedia.org/node/586
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International