Moo Lum Pig Farming: A Zero-Waste Management Technology (-)

Moo Lum Pig Farming: A Zero-Waste Management Technology (Thailand)

Organic Moo Lum Community’s Way of Life

Description

The Zero-Waste Pig Farm or Moo Lum is the integrated management of pigs in pens with the use of microorganisms that lead to the safety of pork products. This technique has become beneficial, as the pig waste can be used as organic fertilizer that produces no pollution to the community.

-The Zero-Waste Pig Farm or Moo Lum is the integrated management of pigs in pens with the use of microorganisms that lead to the safety of pork products. This technique has become beneficial, as the pig waste can be used as organic fertilizer that produces no pollution to the community.
Pig farming in a community generally causes unwanted waste products: pig manure with its strong odor, and polluted water. This causes conflict about the use of land in the community too. The management of the ‘Zero-Waste Pig Farm’ or ‘Moo Lum’ is an alternative practice which greatly reduces the environmental problems caused by traditional pig farming. There are two key elements of the Zero-Waste Pig Farm or Moo Lum management: one is the pig farm and the other is the waste.

A. Pig farm management: housing and feeding.
Housing: pig houses should be built in dry areas, not-to-be-flooded with rainwater in the rainy season. Locally available materials should be used, such as bamboo, grass, etc. The pig house should have good ventilation. Pig pens, on the other hand, should be on bare soil with no cement. In each pig pen there should be a pit, 60-70 cm deep, while the floor of the pig pen one should be covered with rice husks, sawdust or coconut coir. Feeding: Pig raising involves pig food management with concentrated and fermented foods. The raw material is selected from non-chemically treated materials that have gone through processes with use of herbal powder mixed with bio-fermented water. This is the technique to promote animal health and to prevent animal diseases. The pig types in the farm are the popular species of Duroc CLD, Landrace and Large White, from when they are weaned (at about 1 month old).
B. Waste management: Lay the husks or any organic materials on the bottom of the pit in the pen, divided into two layers (about 30 cm thick for each layer), then put salt and bio-fermented solution. Each week, apply the bio-fermented solution to improve the efficiency of the decomposition of pig waste. After a cycle of pig feeding one will get an amount of compost from the pigpen hole. The objective of the zero-waste pig farm or Moo Lum technology is to produce safe pork products through the production process of an environmentally friendly animal farm without pollution and then obtain quality pig manure compost to be used quite beneficially in the organic production process. The zero-waste pig farm or Moo Lum technology processes are as follow:
1. Build the pig houses on an unfloodable area with good ventilation.
2. Build a stall about 4 x 4m wide which can hold 8 pigs.
3. Prepare the stall.
4. Choose the breeds of pigs that are popular.
5. Select the food for the pig obtained through non-chemical processes.
6. Apply bio-degradable pesticides on the floor. Feed the pigs with bio-fermented water. When the pigs get sick, they are treated according to the symptoms with herbal medicine.
7. Take care of them.
The benefit as commented by the users of this technology are as follows:
The user can establish a pig farm in a community with no odour and no flies swarming around. The organic fertilizer from pig manure will improve the quality of the soil in the area, which will benefit the user even further. Another saving is reduced labour from the various cleaning operations needed under conventional management.
However, there are some limitations, as some processes of the technology take unusually longer time. The pork products are not widely known as a ‘safe pork products’ as there is no standard set for such farming by the government. Finally, there is often a shortage of pig food; there should be more production of pig food in the community.

Location

Location: Tambon Don Rae Muang District Ratchaburi province, Ratchaburi, Thailand

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 99.7569, 13.4552
  • 99.75695, 13.45522

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 1969; more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction
Zero-waste pig farm housing (Kulwadee Sutthawas) (kulwadee Sutthawas)
Zero-waste pig farm housing (Kulwadee Sutthawas) (kulwadee sutthawas)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Forest/ woodlands
    • Tree plantation, afforestation. Varieties: Mixed varieties

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation
  • for livestock,pond

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • water degradation - Hp: decline of surface water quality
SLM group
  • integrated soil fertility management
  • waste management/ waste water management
SLM measures
  • management measures - M6: Waste management (recycling, re-use or reduce)
  • other measures - -

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The special technique of the pig farming
1. The pig house
Build houses in dry areas. Do not use cement for the flooring but use locally available materials, such as bamboo, grass, etc. The house should have good ventilation.
2. The preparation of the animal stalls
The dimension of the house must be related to the number of pigs. A 4x4m wide area can house 8 pigs. A female pig will have a 2 x 3 m stall. The brick pavement is 60cm wide. The roof should be wide to spread the rain, so not to splash into the stall and use a brick block or bamboo barrier around and deep from the ground about 40-50 cm to
prevent the pig from digging its way out out. Barriers and gates are required.
3. Preparation of flooring materials
Cover the floor using 60 centimeters of rice husks, and sprinkle bio-fermented over floor material which will remain hot from the work of microorganisms. Leave it for about 7 days, before bringing the pigs in. Then pour bio-fermented water on the floor every 5-7 days, 10 liters each time to help increase the efficiency of decomposing various sewage
Rice husks will absorb moisture and waste; this reduces gas generation from waste collection. A soft rice husk floor, comfortable to walk on, prevents trotter (pig's feet) problems. Pigs like to dig out cool soil. In addition, it does not require a lot of labour and water to clean the house. Rice husks after use is also sold as manure. The surrounding environment is dry, clean and there is no sewage as a source of germs.


4. Breeding
The popular breeds of pigs are Duroc CLD, Landrace and Large White in the weaning range (about 1 month).
5. The pig food
Concentrated foods and fermented foods: Mix in half-half of concentrated and fermented foods to reduce food costs. In addition, fresh grass is added to eat every day (about 0.5 kg/pig). For the fermented food will applied the natural plant as bananas 100 kg, 4 kg of brown sugar, 1 kg of salt, fermented for 4-5 days. The raw material to be used for fermented food will be chosen as from non-chemical process products.
The production of bio-fermented pig food is applied from the bio-fermentation extract which was a local wisdom biotechnology that villagers can do by themselves. The use of vegetables, fruits , carcasses be mixed and fermented with microorganisms from the atmosphere or selected concentrated microorganisms. Molasses was used as fed to the microorganisms.
The usage of herbal extracts and plant extracts which processes under the fermentation by microorganisms with proper timing and methods of fermentation. The animal products that using herbal extracts and the bio-fermented extracts will promote animal health, be prevented and treated from disease.
6. Feeding and watering
(1) Small pig, 15-30 kg, concentrated food: fermented food = 2:1
(2) Medium pig, 30-60 kg, concentrated food: fermented food = 1:1
(3) Large pig, 60 kg – upto weight to send to the market), concentrated food: fermented food = 1:2
(4) Breeders: fermented foods:fermented food = 1:2
The watering for pigs should be normal
7. Medication and prevention
(1) To make the pigs strong, feed them with bio-fermented water. If the food or water is not clean enough the pigs may be affected with diarrhea or liquid (not often) to be treated with fresh guava leaves, blueberries and wormwood.
(2) Use mosquito nets during the night,but if it is an area that has abundant of gnats should use the smashed citronella water and spray the pig at the early evening.


8. Taking care of pigs:
(1) Spray the bio-fermented solution on the floor for the pigs every 7 days.
(2) Clean the house every month. Add husk ash 1-2 times per month.
(3) Monitor pork drinking water often.
Author: Kulwadee Sutthawas

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 27 rai; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 27 Rai; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = 6.25 rai))
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Thai Baht (THB)
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 32.0 Thai Baht (THB)
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 300 THB
Most important factors affecting the costs
ค่าแรง
Establishment activities
  1. Moo Lum management (Timing/ frequency: 2 times a year)
  2. Moo Lum pig waste management (Timing/ frequency: 2 times a year)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 27 rai)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Thai Baht (THB)) Total costs per input (Thai Baht (THB)) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
1Moo Lum management man 210.0 300.0 63000.0 100.0
2.Moo Lum food management man 60.0 300.0 18000.0 100.0
3.Moo Lum waste management man 300.0 300.0 90000.0 100.0
4.Housing man 120.0 300.0 36000.0 100.0
Construction material
1.Housing material โรง 1.0 84000.0 84000.0 100.0
Other
1.pig food animal 90.0 3800.0 342000.0 100.0
2. breeding pig animal 90.0 1500.0 135000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 768'000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 24'000.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Moo Lum management (Timing/ frequency: 2 times a year)
  2. Moo Lum food management (Timing/ frequency: 2 times a year)
  3. Moo Lum waste management (Timing/ frequency: 2 times a year)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 27 rai)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Thai Baht (THB)) Total costs per input (Thai Baht (THB)) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
1.Moo Lum management man 210.0 300.0 63000.0 100.0
2. Moo Lum food management man 60.0 300.0 18000.0 100.0
3. Moo Lum waste management man 300.0 300.0 90000.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 171'000.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 5'343.75

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 1210.0
The area is under the influence of two monsoons: in the rainy season from the southwest, bringing rainfall and in the winter time from the northeast, bringing cold and dry air.
Name of the meteorological station: -
-
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good
Comments

-

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
crop quality
decreased
increased


Better due to the use of quality manure from Moo Lum

risk of production failure
increased
decreased


More diversity of markets

product diversity
decreased
increased


More value-added products

land management
hindered
simplified


Suitable land management

water availability for livestock
decreased
increased

water quality for livestock
decreased
increased

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

workload
increased
decreased


More intensive care

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved


Sustainable production

health situation
worsened
improved


Good health

land use/ water rights
worsened
improved


Well utilized land use

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved


No odor pollution

Ecological impacts
nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased


The pig waste is used as manure/ compost locally.

salinity
increased
decreased


Soil improvement by using manure/ compost from the pig farm

acidity
increased
reduced


Using manure compost for soil improvement

Reduced bad smell in the community
None
None


Reduced bad odor from the farm

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

-

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
epidemic diseases

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
15 families
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
An appropriate breed of pig for Moo Lum. Management system amended to reduce odor.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Adaptation of the availability of local materials reduces the cost.
  • The waste of a pig farm is organic fertilizer.
  • Safe food products
  • Environmentally friendly and not disturbing the neighborhood
  • Is able to establish a pig farm in the community.
  • Makes their farming occupation sustainable.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Make more forms of land use possible.
  • Easy technology, easy to adopt.
  • The technology is adapted to locality.
  • Community accepted and credited.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Takes longer time than ordinary pig farming. Do more research
  • The products from the technology are not well known. Do more PR, by public and related sectors.
  • No guarantee for the standard of the products from this technology esp. the public sector Public sector should consider to set up the standard to make confidence inside and outside country.
  • Increase locally feeding crop production ,so need more area/farmers to produce Gathering farmers into groups /needs more community participation
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • -

References

Compiler
  • Kukiat SOITONG
Editors
Reviewer
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • William Critchley
Date of documentation: Dec. 6, 2018
Last update: Jan. 18, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • -: -
Links to relevant information which is available online
  • -: -
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International