Water storage pond in small-scale agricultural areas (Ms. Munthana Suriyawongpongsa)

Water Storage Ponds in Small-Scale Agricultural Areas (Thailand)

Bo Bao Kanomkrok

Description

"Bo Bao Kanomkrok" is a storage pond excavated as a source of water for agricultural purposes. It is shaped in the form of a rectangle to store water in the rainy season and thus to be a source of water in the dry season.

A water storage facility or "Bo Bao Kanomkrok" is a pond excavated as a source of water for agricultural purposes in the dry season. It is dug in a form of rectangle to store water during the rains and thus to prevent water from drying up in the area. It increases agricultural activities in the dry season. Bo Bao Kanomkrok is excavated in a farmer's agricultural land to a dimension of 8 meters wide, 8 meters long and 10 meters deep. It has a capacity of 640 m3 which is appropriate for an agricultural area of about 6 rai. Water in the storage "bank" is available through the dry season. To establish it, the pond is dug vertically with no side-slopes. After the pond is completed, muddy soil is coated around the bottom and sides to prevent water from seeping out. Plants are grown around the edge of the pond to prevent collapse. Therefore, Bo Bao Kanomkrok is an appropriate low cost option for providing stored water to crops on a small-scale. It is a good prototype for extending to other agricultural plots in the community and adjacent communities. In the small-scale agricultural areas there are fruit-bearing trees, perennial crops and vegetables such as sweet yellow marian plums, durians, santols, hairy-leafed apitongs, Barking Deer's Mango, hedge bamboo, Paco fern, bananas, Garcinia cowa, Brazilian Pepper-tree, etc. Bo Bao Kanomkrok must be maintained by the owner so that it will be efficient in storing water throughout the year.

Ban Thung Krapong Learning Center, Nakhon Nayok province is the prototype for communities to learning to solve problems by themselves, by studying from nature and the environment in the community.

Location

Location: Ban Thung Krapong Learning Center, Nakhon Nayok province, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -259.84036, 14.06454

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 87; 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Water storage pond in small-scale agricultural areas (Ms. Munthana Suriyawongpongsa)
Different kinds and varieties of crops (Ms. Munthana Suriyawongpongsa)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1
    Is intercropping practiced? Yes
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wo: offsite degradation effects
SLM group
  • water harvesting
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S7: Water harvesting/ supply/ irrigation equipment

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
None
Author: Munthana Suriyawongpongsa

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 6 rais)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: n.a.
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 32.0
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 300 Baht per day
Most important factors affecting the costs
The amount of sediment
Establishment activities
  1. Labour cost (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rains)
  2. Backhoe (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rains)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 6 rais)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labour cost for digging sediments out from well head 4.0 300.0 1200.0 100.0
Labour for driving Backhoe hours 3.0 1200.0 3600.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 4'800.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 150.0
Maintenance activities
  1. In long term,sediments accumulation inside the well. Therefore, we have to dig out from them. (Timing/ frequency: once per 10 years)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 6 rais)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (n.a.) Total costs per input (n.a.) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
Backhoe hour 1.0 1200.0 1200.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 1'200.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 37.5

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 1500.0
Rainfall season is between May to October and Heavy rainfall is during August and September
Name of the meteorological station: Nakhon Nayok Meteorological Station
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

crop quality
decreased
x
increased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased


more diversity of plants

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased


area of plants increases

land management
hindered
x
simplified


easier soil management

water availability for livestock
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water availability
decreased
x
increased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

health situation
worsened
x
improved

land use/ water rights
worsened
x
improved

community institutions
weakened
x
strengthened

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
x
recharge

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
x
increased

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
x
improved

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: dry season
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
tropical storm

not well at all
x
very well
extra-tropical cyclone

not well at all
x
very well
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
local thunderstorm

not well at all
x
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
x
very well
flash flood

not well at all
x
very well
storm surge/ coastal flood

not well at all
x
very well
epidemic diseases

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
insect/ worm infestation

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
Other climate-related consequences
extended growing period

not well at all
x
very well
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
87 (110 )
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
Land use change

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Bo Bao Kanomkrok is an appropriate and low cost measure in storing water to use in small-scale agricultural areas.
  • It is a good prototype for extending to other farms in the community and adjacent communities.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Appropriate for farmers for storing water to use throughout the year
  • Benefit for farmers to have small farm ponds for producing their own food.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • The ponds must be maintained by the owner so it will be efficiency in storing water throughout the year.
  • Choosing the area to drill requires certain experiences/expertise, as the area must have a spring.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Because the sediment deposits in the pond with time, it may affect the amount of stored water. The sediment should be excavated out of the pond every year or as needed.

References

Compiler
  • Bunjirtluk Jintaridth
Editors
Reviewer
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Pitayakon Limtong
  • William Critchley
Date of documentation: Oct. 18, 2018
Last update: Jan. 15, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • -: -
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International