An overview of the orchard lands which are irrigated through hydraulic flange pump (Abdul Saboor Popal)

Irrigation of uplands through Hydraulic Flange Pump (Afghanistan)

Aabyari zamin hai boland Aaba thawasut Pump_e_Aabi_Charkhdar

Description

Technology for lifting water to uplands: hydraulic flange pump, reservoir and pipe scheme.

This technology is documented by the Sustainable Land Management Project, implemented by HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation and funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), with close support and cooperation of People in Need.
Samangan, Khuram wa Sarbagh district, Klor-e-Bala village is situated in a mountainous region where the greatest limiting factor to agricultural production is water. Arable lands are located far away from water sources. Lack of technology to exploit these lands prohibits villagers to cultivate their land to make a livelihood. Therefore, families are compelled to leave their village during summer.

Purpose of the Technology: To address this problem, People in Need (PIN), with financial support from GIZ and the Czech Embassy (CzDA) introduced irrigation through hydraulic flange pump. The hydraulic flange pump provides water to 30 orchards of Klor-e-Bala village, drinking water to the 43 village households, the mosque and the school of 500 students.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The main water source which starts and runs the hydraulic flange pump is the Khuwaja Hayat spring. The spring water arrives to the hydraulic flange pump from 1.8 meter height on a 12 percent slope in 200 meters distance from the water source. The water flow passes through the intake and moves towards the water wheel which starts/runs the hydraulic flange pump. The water is then pumped through three pipes of one inch to the reservoir. The hydraulic flange pump has the capacity of lifting water up to 250 meters.
The reservoir’s storage capacity is 25,600 liters of water with the dimensions as follows: 4.9 meter length; 2.9 m width; and 1.8 m height. It has two outlets: a spill way fitted with three pipes of one inch at the top of the reservoir and two outlets fitted with two pipes of three inches at the bottom. The lower outlet leads water to the orchards by diverting water after 40 meters into two pipes which are 1,000 meters long. Each orchard is connected to one of these two pipes by a T-connector and the water flows into a tin water tank with the capacity of 1,000 liters for each orchard. The two pipes are extended as far as the school which is located near the orchards and has been equipped with a 2000 liters tin water tank.
The hydraulic flange pump is made locally in Taloqan city, Takhar province of Afghanistan in the Baradaran-e- Kargar workshop. The pump costs 140,000 Afghani/ 2,200 US$, including installment. The estimated cost of the construction of the reservoir and the pump’s room including the hydraulic flange pump is 19,000 US$. The pipe scheme of the project was installed by the Community Development Council (CDC) with technical support from PIN’s engineering team. Community members contributed 10 percent of the costs as labor. As Klor-e-Bala village is situated in flood prone area and flooding is a common occurrence, PIN, with funding from the GIZ, constructed in 2015 two protection walls, 45 m and 55 m in length, on both sides of the river, to minimize erosion and protect the pump’s intake from floods. The protection walls were built through cash for work programme, but community members provided 10 percent contribution through labor and by providing stones for construction. The total estimated cost of the hydraulic flange pump, reservoir and pipe scheme technology amounted to 37,000 US$.
Furthermore, in order to maintain the technology, a caretaker, who lives close to the pump’s room has been appointed. The caretaker was trained by the technician who installed the hydraulic flange pump and has voluntarily taken the responsibility of maintenance activities; changing the oil and cleaning of the hydraulic flange pump's room and changing of the pipes in case of need. The owners of the orchards have to cover for all maintenance costs and the chairman of the Community Development Council (CDC) has the responsibility of managing the money for maintenance and other recurrent activities.
The flange pump technology contributed to the economic growth of the community members by increasing the orchards’ yields. Currently, the hydraulic flange pump irrigates 12 jireb/2.4 ha (30*800m2) orchards of apple, apricot, almond, pear and cherry trees. In addition to the orchards, alfalfa, potato, vegetables and other crops are as well cultivated on these lands. Furthermore, the pump supports the community members to settle year-round in their villages and prevents from their seasonal displacement. Moreover, the flange pump enables the provision of drinking water to the whole community and the school.

Natural / human environment: Samangan is one of the northern provinces of Afghanistan. Wheat, melons, pistachio,
almonds, potatoes, onions and caraway are important crops and Karakul sheep
and goats the main livestock for meat, dairy, and wool production. Rugs are the
main handicraft of this area. Khuram-wa-Sarbagh district in Samangan has two growing
seasons, the longest of which is 150 days from February to June and the second is 90
days from June to September. The average rainfall is below 500mm and the climate semi-arid.
The community members have limited access to off farm employment, market, energy,
financial services, roads and transportation and moderate access to health and education.

Location

Location: Khuram-wa-Sarbagh district, Klor_e_Bala village, Samangan, Afghanistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • n.a.

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 1-10 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
An overview of the orchard lands which are irrigated through hydraulic flange pump (Abdul Saboor Popal (People In Need))
Hydraulic flange pump which is made by the Baradaran company (Abdul Saboor Popal (People In Need))

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • access to water
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Agroforestry

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    • Tree and shrub cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
  • Grazing land

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
SLM group
  • natural and semi-natural forest management
  • agroforestry
  • irrigation management (incl. water supply, drainage)
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S5: Dams, pans, ponds

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
A detailed technical drawing of the hydraulic flange pump and the reservoir, Klor-e-Bala village, Khuram-wa-Sarbagh district, Samangan province.

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), water harvesting / increase water supply, water spreading
Author: Eng. Saboor Popal, People In Need (PIN)

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 7.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
Labor, stone and equipment are the main fundamental factors which need high initial investments. After a couple of years pipes may need to be changed.
Establishment activities
  1. Excavation of the foundation (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Construction activities,Stone masonry foundation and wall: (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. a:P.C.C concrete foundationb:R.C.C concretec:Iron shattering for walls, roof and floord:External and internal pointing (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. a:Plasteringb:Steel barsc:Door and window (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. Pipe scheme:a:Pipesb:Water tanksc:other equipmentd:Skilled and unskilled labor (Timing/ frequency: None)
  6. Procurement of the Hydraulic flange pump (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Excavation of the foundation square meters 50.0 2.88 144.0 10.0
Excavation of the foundation cubic meters 161.0 2.4037 387.0 10.0
Skilled and unskilled labor persons/day 343.0 9.47521 3250.0 10.0
Equipment
Water tanks pieces 39.0 98.615384 3846.0 10.0
Pipes meter 2900.0 2.9241379 8480.0 10.0
Other equipment all 1.0 2424.0 2424.0 10.0
Procurement of the Hydraulic flange pump pieces 1.0 2200.0 2200.0 10.0
Construction material
Concrete foundation cubic meters 12.23 96.64758 1182.0 10.0
Concrete cubic meters 8.4 114.0476 958.0 10.0
Iron shattering for walls, roof and floor cubic meters 110.0 4.86363 535.0 10.0
External and internal pointing square meters 226.0 2.85398 645.0 10.0
Plastering square meters 32.0 5.9375 190.0 10.0
Steel bars square meters 364.4 1.21844 444.0 10.0
Door and window square meters 3.98 28.8944 115.0 10.0
Stones square meters 244.0 50.0 12200.0 10.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 37'000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 37'000.0
Maintenance activities
  1. Changing of the pipes (Timing/ frequency: Once a year)
  2. Cleaning of the flange pump room (Timing/ frequency: Six times a year)
  3. Changing of the hydraulic flange pump oil (Timing/ frequency: None)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Changing of the pipes persons/day 1.0 7.0 7.0 100.0
Cleaning of the flange pump room persons/day 1.0 7.0 7.0 100.0
Changing of the hydraulic flange pump oil persons/day 1.0 7.0 7.0 100.0
Equipment
Pipes meter 20.0 0.65 13.0 100.0
Oil times/year 4.0 4.5 18.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 52.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 52.0

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

product diversity
decreased
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

land management
hindered
simplified

drinking water availability
decreased
increased

water availability for livestock
decreased
increased

water quality for livestock
decreased
increased

irrigation water availability
decreased
increased

irrigation water quality
decreased
increased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

workload
increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

health situation
worsened
improved

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved


In case the owner of the first orchard do not obey the water use right

livelihood and human well-being
reduced
improved


The pump improved households’ economy through increasing agricultural yieIds and by decreasing the need for a generator pump. It has as well reduced the workload of the community members

Ecological impacts
harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved

evaporation
increased
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced

soil compaction
increased
reduced

salinity
increased
decreased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

animal diversity
decreased
increased

flood impacts
increased
decreased

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased


It has decreased the water flow only in the place where the hydraulic flange pump is installed.

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
improved

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
reduced

damage on public/ private infrastructure
increased
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
annual rainfall increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
Answer: not known
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
flash flood

not well at all
very well
length of growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
98 households covering 50 percent of the stated area
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Application of the technology has reduced the workload for the families.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Greater awareness on water management can be created by training/workshop for the water users.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • The technology has supported the community members economically by increasing agricultural yields. Moreover, it contributes to reduce the costs of water during the summer season.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? The land users should try to plant local and native trees and cultivate the crops which are adapted to the land.Community members should actively participate in maintenance activities.
  • Provides safe drinking water to the 43 households and the
    school at low cost.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Pipe scheme and cover of the reservoir, should be cleaned regularly. If any leakages occurs in the pipes or reservoir, they should be sealed. Water taps and water tanks should be properly maintained.
  • This technology has been applied in a low slope/latitude where the water flows with a very low speed and the application of other technologies was difficult.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Protect from sedimentation.
  • The hydraulic flange pump is produced locally. Procurement and installment of the pump contributes therefore to local economic growth and private sector development.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Link the company to the other potential buyers.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Social conflicts can occur during the distribution of water The water in keeper/maintainer can be introduced by CDCs for the distribution of water.
  • Electricity cannot be produced by applying this technology. The slope and latitude of the location where the flange pump is installed is too small.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • It is difficult to apply the technology without any external and
    financial support. Locally available materials should be used to reduce costs.
  • High level of technical knowledge is required for the establishment of the technology. The technical knowledge should be transferred to the extension workers or local people to provide technical support in the future.
  • This technology needs regular maintenance and the reservoir
    has to be properly cleaned after heavy rainfalls. The CDC should monitor maintenance activities by the caretaker as well as manage funds for maintenance costs.

References

Compiler
  • Aqila Haidery
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • David Streiff
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: May 31, 2016
Last update: March 6, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International