Use of coconut leaves mulch covering the soil of winter melon plantation (Ms. Chea Navin)

Coconut leaves mulching for winter melon cultivation (Cambodia)

Description

The use of coconut leaves mulch for winter melon cultivation helps to conserve soil moisture, reduces evaporation, reduces weeds, saves water, preserves the soil from erosion, and increases crop productivity.

Coconut leaves mulching is the process of covering the soil around plant root area using green/ dry coconut leaves to help keep the soil moisture longer and reduce evaporation and temperatures, especially during the dry season. Beside this, the use of coconut leaves mulch for covering rows of winter melons helps to prevent soil erosion, improves soil fertility, reduces weed growth, and increases soil fertility following the decomposition of the plant residues. The soils best suited to winter melon cultivation are loamy and sandy loam soils with a soil pH of between 5.0 and 6.3 and soils along the low-land areas. If the pH soil is lower than 5.0, the melon growth is not good and may accelerate the ripening of the fruit before the appropriate time, with the fruit plants sometimes dying due to lack of nutrients (TSTD, 2012). The roots of the winter melon are able to grow in soil with a depth of between 65 and 100 cm, particularly sandy soils. This crop is not suitable for cultivation in areas which are wind prone because of increased moisture loss through plant evapotranspiration. Such areas are also sometimes prone to high temperatures which are also unsuitable for winter melon.

The implementation area for this study was 280 squares meters, with a row height of 20-30 centimeters, a row width of 1 meter, row length of 40 meters, and row spacing of 1.5 meters. There were a total of 8 planted rows, with 40 melon stems being planted into each row. The crop stems and the intercrop space between the rows is covered with coconut leaves by laying the leaves along the slopes of the melon crop, with 5 or 6 coconut leaves as mulch along the two sides of the crop. In order to save time and water, farmers used drip irrigation using a pipe irrigation system that could provide water at a rate of about 6 liters per house, twice daily (in the morning and evening). Irrigation was provided over 20 minute periods at a rate of 100 ml per minute (although this was reduced during the rainy season). The watering technique is not required to fill the basal area of the stem of growing winter melon plants. Water is generally not provided at noon or late evening as watering at this time can cause problems, such as rotting of roots. If the soil around the stem becomes dry, more water should be applied at short notice without waiting for the soil to dry out. This is particularly important in the period immediately after planting of the seedlings, when water and nutrients are important for initial plant growth. Also, during the flowering and fruiting phases of melon plant growth, water needs have to be closely monitored. As the soil had previously been used for sugarcane cropping, the nutrient status of the soil was low, so farmers have improved the soil nutrient status by adding some organic fertilizer (cow manure) and some chemical fertilizers in an appropriate manner. In addition, some pesticides have been used as well.

In general, the advantage of this technique is the low cost materials which are locally available, such as coconut leaves, and materials which can be purchased in the local market, such as drip pipe, black plastic string, etc. However, the important aspects of the adoption of this technique, besides improving soil quality and maintaining a stable environment, is that it provides practical and potential economic benefits to farmers of about 800,000 (US$ 200) Riel per season.

Location

Location: Chamkar Ou village, Trapeang chorng commune, Bakan district, Pursat province, Cambodia

No. of Technology sites analysed: 10-100 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 103.79317, 12.54991

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2013

Type of introduction
Drying field after harvest of paddy rice and before planting of winter melon (Ms. Chea Navin)
View of coconut leaves used as mulch (Ms.Chea Navin)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: vegetables - melon, pumpkin, squash or gourd
    Number of growing seasons per year: 3
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bl: loss of soil life
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • ground water management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The implementation area of this technology is 280 square meters. The technique used for the winter melon planting area was 1 meter in width and 40 meter in length with using pipe irrigation. The farmers used an interrow spacing of 1.5 m and there are 8 rows in total. The topography of the area is flat (0-2%) with the soil being a loamy and sandy soil. The establishment activities are working for the seedling preparation, the installment of the irrigation system, the building of the pole support, the seedling transplantation, the out planting of the winter melon seedlings including the cover by coconut leaves. Cow manure, rice husks and coconut coir were used as organic nutrient sources and improving the soil organic status for maintaining a stable environment.
Author: Mr. Khuon Sophal

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 280 squre meters; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = 10000 square meters)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Riel
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4000.0 Riel
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 25000 Riel
Most important factors affecting the costs
•Fixing the irrigation pipes is 20000 Riel for repair service per time. •Buying the black string for building pole support, which is 37600 Riel per time.
Establishment activities
  1. Drying soil in the field (Timing/ frequency: After harvest of crops)
  2. Create rows by hilling up soil (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rains)
  3. Installation of the irrigation system (Timing/ frequency: before outplanting of the winter melon)
  4. Digging the hole (Timing/ frequency: 2 days before transplanting)
  5. Outplanting of the winter melon seedlings including the cover by coconut leaves (Timing/ frequency: 1 day of outplanting)
  6. Building the pole of support (Timing/ frequency: 3 days after transplanting)
  7. Seedling transplantation (Timing/ frequency: Before onset of rains)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 280 squre meters)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Riel) Total costs per input (Riel) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Seedling preparation person-day 1.0 25000.0 25000.0 100.0
Soil preparation person-day 5.0 30000.0 150000.0 100.0
Building of the pole support person-day 2.0 25000.0 50000.0 100.0
Installment of the irrigation system pieces 2.5 27500.0 68750.0 100.0
Equipment
Hoe set 2.0 7000.0 14000.0 100.0
Scissors set 5.0 2500.0 12500.0 100.0
Hacksaw set 1.0 12000.0 12000.0 100.0
Axe set 1.0 12000.0 12000.0 100.0
Watering can pair 2.0 25000.0 50000.0 100.0
Floral hoe set 3.0 15000.0 45000.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Pesticide bottle 2.0 2500.0 5000.0 100.0
DAP bottle 2.0 25000.0 50000.0 100.0
Cali kg 50.0 2400.0 120000.0 100.0
UREA kg 50.0 1800.0 90000.0 100.0
Cow manure bag 1.0 25000.0 25000.0 100.0
Construction material
Black string for building pole support kg 5.0 47000.0 235000.0 100.0
Irrigation pipes pieces 2.5 90000.0 225000.0 100.0
Valve number 1.0 20000.0 20000.0 100.0
Other
Create rows by hilling up soil person-day 2.0 25000.0 50000.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'259'250.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 314.81
Maintenance activities
  1. Watering in the morning and evening (Timing/ frequency: 2 times per day, 2-3 minutes per time)
  2. Cutting the grass or branches of plant (3-4 braches) (Timing/ frequency: every 14 days per time during the growing period)
  3. Spraying the pesticide if needed (Timing/ frequency: when damaged by insects)
  4. Fixing the irrigaton pipes (Timing/ frequency: once per growing season)
  5. Installing poles support for the melon (Timing/ frequency: once per growing season)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 280 squre meters)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Riel) Total costs per input (Riel) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Thinning the branches Person-day 1.0 25000.0 25000.0 100.0
Fixing the irrigation pipes Person-day 1.0 20000.0 20000.0 100.0
Equipment
Irrigation pipes kg 8.0 4700.0 37600.0 100.0
Black strings for pole support kg 7.0 4700.0 32900.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 115'500.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 28.88

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
In 2015, the annual rainfall was 1225.7
In 2014, the annual rainfall was 1128.1
In 2013, the annual rainfall was 1316
Name of the meteorological station: Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology (2015)
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased


The farmer used the coconut leaves mulch keeps good soil moisture and increase soil nutrient, thus increasing the crop production.

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased


Farmer used raw material (coconut leaves) around her home that does not require any cost.

farm income
decreased
x
increased


This technology improves soil moisture and soil nutrient, with less expense on the inputs as the coconut leaves are available around the house, thus the farm income increases.

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved


After the farmer applied this technology, she was able to better secure food consumption in her house, and as well she was able to sell the winter melons at the market to get more income for buying food.

health situation
worsened
x
improved


The farmer grew winter melon without any chemical use. She ate healthy vegetable that improved the health situation accordingly.

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved


Farmer knows how to conserve soil moisture and preserves the soil from erosion, and increases crop productivity through implementing this SLM technology as before her land was not good for planting vegetable. She tried to convert her land from infertile to fertile soil using animal manure (cow dung) mixed with topsoil from the hill.

Ecological impacts
evaporation
increased
x
decreased


The technology area decreased the evaporation by using the coconut mulch as it keeps the soil moisture during the dry period.

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased


The soil moisture is still remain even it dried for 3 days.

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


The conversion from infertile to fertile soil using animal manure mixed with topsoil increased the amount of soil organic matter.

drought impacts
increased
x
decreased


The improved soil moisture let the winter melon plant survive even at drought events of one week.

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: summer
annual rainfall increase

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
x
very well
flash flood

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
16 housholds of Chamkar Ou village implemented the technology (the one examined in this case study included)
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • This form of mulching is good for some farmers who do not have money for the purchase of plastic mulching materials.
  • It provides good soil health and keeps a stable environment for humans.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • It is important that the farmers can understand the environment, and that they can also find low cost materials around their houses, such as coconut leaves mulch, because such materials will not pollute the soil and environment.
  • Keep the soil quality using animal manure (cow dung)
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • It is difficult for first time implementation. Try as much as possible to learn from the growing experience.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome

References

Compiler
  • Sok Pheak
Editors
  • Sophea Tim
  • Navin Chea
Reviewer
  • Nicole Harari
  • SO Than
  • Stephanie Jaquet
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Aug. 23, 2017
Last update: March 1, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Lalljee, B., 2013. Mulching as a mitigation agricultural technology against land degradation in the wake of climate change. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 1(3), pp. 68-74.: Free of charge
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International