Preparación suelo, luego del subsolado y primer rastraje

Sistema Ganado-Cultivo: Rotación de Pradera-Cultivo Mediante Mínima Labranza (Chile)

Description

Sistema ganado-cultivo. Rotación de cereales con praderas leguminosas anuales permanentes en suelos de baja pendiente en zona de secano

La tecnología implementada consiste en un sistema de mínima labranza para establecer cereales y leguminosas de grano en el secano interior de la zona centro-sur de Chile, específicamente en la comuna de Ránquil, provincia de Ñuble, Región del Biobío. Lo recomendable para la zona es establecer los cultivos en cero labranza, pero la baja disponibilidad de maquinaria limita esta opción.

Propósito de la tecnologia: La tecnología descrita reemplaza el sistema tradicional de producción en la zona, que consiste en el año anterior a la siembra hacer un barbecho y al año siguiente sembrar. Mantiene un cierto equilibrio entre la actividad agropecuaria y la actividad forestal.

Actividades de establecimiento / mantenimiento e insumos: Las investigaciones desarrolladas por INIA en la zona han demostrado que existen muchas dificultades para que las aguas lluvias y la raíces de los cultivos penetren y se desarrollen en el perfil del suelo. Para ello, en primer término y cada 3 o 4 años es necesario realizar una aradura vertical en profundidad (45 cm) denominada subsolado. Esta labor y las siembras se realizan en suelos con menos de un 15 – 20% de pendiente.
En estas condiciones se puede iniciar una rotación en el área de cereales con leguminosas de grano. Al año siguiente, donde había cereales, incluso se pueden sembrar praderas a base de leguminosas de grano. Luego, del subsolado, se pasa una rastra para preparar una cama de semilla, a continuación se desparrama a mano la semilla y el fertilizante y con la misma rastra se tapa la semilla.
La tecnología se resume en prestar mucha atención a la labor de subsolado y época de siembra, sembrando a inicio del mes de mayo, con uso de semillas de alto potencial de rendimiento, adaptadas a la zona, y una fertilización balanceada a la siembra se puede alcanzar un rápido cubrimiento del suelo, que sirve como defensa a la erosión hídrica. Si bien se produce cierto grado de pérdida de suelos por erosión, ésta es mucho menor que en el sistema tradicional, cuando se hace barbecho y se siembran variedades antiguas de bajo crecimiento invernal.
Al segundo año se deja una porción de las pajas y residuos (rastrojos) sobre el suelo, de manera de reducir las pérdidas por erosión.

Location

Location: Comuna Ránquil, Región del Bíobío, Provincia Ñuble, Chile

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -72.5973, -36.65257

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. 10-100 km2)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Temporada siguiente: residuos sobre el suelo para favorecer protección suelo de la erosión y aumentar m.o., en el marco de una rotación trigo, avena, triticale, leguminosas

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - oats, cereals - other, fodder crops - other, legumes and pulses - other, trigo
    • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
    Is crop rotation practiced? Yes

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A7: Others

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Trigo Kipa INIA, 44,4 qqm/ha, costo operativo anual 25,6
qqm/ha.
Conocimientos técnicos necesarios para el personal / asesores de campo: medio
Conocimientos técnicos necesarios para los usuarios de la tierra: medio
Conocimientos técnicos necesarios para Personal de campo: medio
Principales funciones técnicas: control del impacto de la caida de lluvia, control de la escorrentía dispersa: impedir / retrasar, incremento del nivel del agua subterránea, recarga de agua subterránea

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Peso chileno
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 509.25 Peso chileno
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
  1. Compra y flete insumos (Timing/ frequency: None)
  2. Limpia terreno (Horas máquina (ha)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  3. Subsolador tractor (Horas máquina (ha)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  4. Rastraje, rastra Kong Kilder, tractor (Horas máquina (ha)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  5. Aplicación fertilizantes al voleo (Horas hombre (h)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  6. Siembra al voleo (Horas hombre (h)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  7. Rastraje rapado semilla, rastra Kong Kilder, tractor (Horas máquina (ha)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  8. Aplicación herbicida control malezas (Horas hombre (h)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  9. Aplicación urea. Segunda aplicación nitrógeno (Horas hombre (h)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  10. Aplicación urea. Tercera aplicación nitrógeno (Horas hombre (h)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
  11. Trilla (Horas máquina (h)) (Timing/ frequency: None)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Peso chileno) Total costs per input (Peso chileno) % of costs borne by land users
Equipment
Subsolador tractor 1.0 78.55 78.55
Rastraje, rastra Kong Kilder, tractor 1.0 29.46 29.46
Rastraje rapado semilla, rastra Kong Kilder, tractor 1.0 29.46 29.46
Plant material
Limpia terreno 2.0 29.47 58.94
Fertilizers and biocides
Aplicación fertilizantes al voleo 1.0 295.92 295.92
Siembra al voleo 1.0 119.78 119.78
Aplicación herbicida control malezas 1.0 27.17 27.17
Aplicación urea. Segunda aplicación nitrógeno 1.0 13.75 13.75
Other
Compra y flete insumos 1.0 39.27 39.27
Aplicación urea. Tercera aplicación nitrógeno 1.0 13.75 13.75
Trilla 1.0 70.69 70.69
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 776.74
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 1.53
Maintenance activities
n.a.

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
n.a.
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

fodder production
decreased
increased

fodder quality
decreased
increased

animal production
decreased
increased

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

land management
hindered
simplified


Necesidad de maquinaria

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased

farm income
decreased
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
reduced
improved

recreational opportunities
reduced
improved

community institutions
weakened
strengthened

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased

water quality
decreased
increased

surface runoff
increased
decreased

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
recharge

evaporation
increased
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
increased

soil cover
reduced
improved

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

animal diversity
decreased
increased

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased

Off-site impacts
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
reduced

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
reduced

wind transported sediments
increased
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Benefits compared with maintenance costs

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
Disminución de la temperatura o aumento de episodios

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Buen nivel de producción
  • Se produce todos los años en un mismo sitio
  • Mejora el potencial productivo del suelo
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Metodo tradicional de cosecha afecta la fertilidad natural
  • Tentación de agricultores volver a metodo tradicional

References

Compiler
  • Florian Dieker
Editors
Reviewer
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: May 6, 2015
Last update: March 13, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • FAO (2014). Sistematización de Prácticas de Conservación de Suelos y Aguas para la Adaptación al Cambio Climático. Metodología basada en WOCAT para América Latina y el Caribe.: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3741s/index.html
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International