Foto adicional - Sistema de zanjas de infiltración en curva de nivel en el secano de la VI Región

Zanjas de Infiltración (Chile)

Description

Zanjas de Infiltración

En Chile, debido a la conformación geográfica y el tipo de régimen pluviométrico, la erosión hídrica es una de las formas más importantes de degradación del suelo. Así, el que un gran porcentaje de las lluvias precipite en invierno cuando el suelo está descubierto, unido a malas prácticas de cultivo, provoca importantes daños erosivos (INIA, 2001).
En este marco, la construcción de obras para la captura de aguas de lluvia (water harvesting en la literatura anglosajona), en particular las zanjas de infiltración, ha permitido proporcionar una técnica adecuada para reducir los actuales índices de desertificación, y también propiciar el proceso de infiltración de las aguas de lluvia bajo condiciones edafoclimáticas desfavorables, de tal forma que permitan el cultivo o la forestación de zonas de secano (FAO 1994, Boers y Ben-Asher 1982) y la recarga artificial de las napas freáticas.

Propósito de la tecnología: Cosechar aguas frente al persistente déficit hídrico, abastecer napas subterráneas y mejorar cubiertas vegetales, disminuir efectos erosivos y escurrimiento

Actividades de establecimiento / mantenimiento e insumos: Construcción de zanja de infiltración (m lineal):
Acequias excavadas en curvas de nivel, es decir, en forma transversal a la pendiente del terreno. Su función es de contener el escurrimiento del agua y favorecer su infiltración en el suelo. Presenta una sección trapezoidal con un ancho mínimo en la boca de 50 cm y en la base de 25 cm.
La profundidad efectiva mínima en la cara inferior es de 40 cm. La tierra excavada se coloca en el borde inferior de la zanja para darle una sobreelevación. Es recomendable interrumpir la zanja con pequeños tabiques o espacios sin excavar más de 15 cm al lo largo de la misma con el fin de homogeneizar la infiltración de agua. El cálculo de distanciamiento sobre la pendiente entre líneas de zanjas (distanciamiento vertical) deberá basarse en la metodología recomendada por el SAG o INDAP, según donde se presente el plan de manejo. Se excluye la construcción de zanjas en suelos no estructurados.

Location

Location: Regiones VI a VIII, Chile

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • -71.00223, -34.57547

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (6.0 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Zanja de infiltración.
foto adicional 2

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: No

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
  • water degradation - Hs: change in quantity of surface water
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • water harvesting
  • ground water management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
El dibujo muestra las directrices y fórmulas para estimar las dimensiones de las zanjas de infiltración.
Conocimientos técnicos necesarios para el personal / asesores de campo: medio
Conocimientos técnicos necesarios para los usuarios de la tierra: medio
Principales funciones técnicas: control del impacto de la caida de lluvia, control de la escorrentía dispersa: retener / atrapar, control de la escorrentía concentrada: retener / atrapar, mejoramiento de la cobertura del suelo, incremento de la rugosidad de la superficie, aumento de la materia orgánica, incremento de la disponibilidad de nutrientes (abastecimiento, reciclado,…), incremento de la infiltración, incremento del nivel del agua subterránea, recarga de agua subterránea, captura de agua / incremento en el abastecimiento de agua, retención de sedimentos / trampas, captura de sedimentos, incremento de la biomasa (cantidad), promoción de especies y variedades vegetales

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Peso chileno
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 510.0 Peso chileno
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: n.a
Most important factors affecting the costs
n.a.
Establishment activities
n.a.
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Peso chileno) Total costs per input (Peso chileno) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Mano de obra ha 1.0 1.36 1.36 10.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1.36
Maintenance activities
n.a.

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
100 a 600mm; Estacionalidad de las lluvias: desde Mayo hasta Septiembre (regiones VI y VII)
Thermal climate class: temperate
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

fodder production
decreased
x
increased

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
x
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
x
improved

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
x
recharge

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Benefits compared with maintenance costs

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Existe un marco normativo y financiamiento con vigencia al 2022
  • Buenos profesionales y técnicos de apoyo
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Mantención de obras
  • Capacitación

References

Compiler
  • Florian Dieker
Editors
Reviewer
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: May 13, 2015
Last update: March 19, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • FAO (2014). Sistematización de Prácticas de Conservación de Suelos y Aguas para la Adaptación al Cambio Climático. Metodología basada en WOCAT para América Latina y el Caribe.: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3741s/index.html
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International