Terraces in the Loess Plateau. (LIU Baoyuan, Beijing China)

Terrace (China)

Terrace

Description

A terrace is a kind of measure to change the slope, which has a raised bank of earth or stone with vertical or sloping sides and a approximately flat top.

A terrace has a raised bank of earth or stone with vertical or sloping sides and a approximately flat top. It can reduce slope angle and length, retain runoff, increase infiltration and reduce the soil loss. Crops can grow well because water increases in soils. Meanwhile, ground cover is improved. Terrace can be constructed by manual labor or machine. Firstly, determining the width of the field according to the slope angle and soil texture. Secondly, putting the topsoil aside. Thirdly, leveling up the slope and constructing banks. At last, putting the topsoil to the top of the flat surface.

Location

Location: Shaanxi, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Henan, Gansu, China

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 109.125, 39.122

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (26666.7 km²)

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: more than 50 years ago (traditional)

Type of introduction

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - maize, legumes and pulses - peas
    • Tree and shrub cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
SLM group
  • cross-slope measure
SLM measures
  • structural measures - S1: Terraces

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
Drawings of a terrace building in the Loess Plateau

Location: the Loess Plateau. Shaanxi, Shanxi, Henan, Gansu, Inner Mongolia

Date: 2002

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: low

Main technical functions: reduction of slope angle, reduction of slope length

Construction material (earth): Construct ridge of terrace

Construction material (stone): Construct ridge of terrace

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 25%

If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is: 10%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 80%

For water harvesting: the ratio between the area where the harvested water is applied and the total area from which water is collected is: 1:6
Author: BAI Zhanguo, Beijing China

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 3.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
The factors are topography, soil texture, means of construction. The section of terrace is the most important factor.
Establishment activities
  1. survey (Timing/ frequency: After harvesting crop)
  2. constructing terrace: determine the excavation line which should make the excavation and the filling equal and the least workload (Timing/ frequency: After harvesting crop, before raining season)
  3. constructing terrace: pilling mellow soil up to the middle of a bench (Timing/ frequency: After harvesting crop, before raining season)
  4. constructing terrace: moving the immature soil of lower part to fill the upper part or moving the soil from inside to fill up outside (Timing/ frequency: After harvesting crop, before raining season)
  5. constructing terrace: building the ridge (Timing/ frequency: After harvesting crop, before raining season)
  6. constructing terrace: spreading the mellow soil on the surface (Timing/ frequency: After harvesting crop, before raining season)
Maintenance activities
  1. periodically inspecting (Timing/ frequency: After a storm/About 1 year)
  2. repairing where terrace is collapsed (Timing/ frequency: Whenever finding it is destroyed/timely)
  3. level up the field (Timing/ frequency: after harvesting crops/timely)

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 449.0
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Socio-cultural impacts
Ecological impacts
surface runoff
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 10
Quantity after SLM: 4

soil loss
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 180
Quantity after SLM: 58

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

-

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome

References

Compiler
  • Meili WEN
Editors
Reviewer
  • David Streiff
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: Dec. 29, 2010
Last update: March 19, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • (inner resources) Suide Water and Soil Conservation examination station of Yellow River Water Resources Committee.. 1981.: orpus of Test Research of Water and Soil Conservation (the second volume), p130~185.
  • (inner resources) Water and Soil Conservation Department of Yellow River Water Resources Committee of Ministry of Water Resources and Electric Power.. 1987.: Corpus of economic benefits of water and soil measures, p77~102 ,510~514
  • Dongyinglin,Changpiguang ,Wangzhihua. Discussion on the several questions on increasing production of the terrace with two banks.. 1990.: Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi, No.1, p36~37
  • Jiangdingsheng. Discussion on section design of the terrace on the Loess Plateau.. 1987.: ACTA CONSERVATIONIS SOLI ET AQUAE SINICA, Vol.1, No.2,p28~35.
  • Liangqichun, Changfushuang , Liming. A study on drawing up budgetary estimate quota of terraced field.. 2001.: Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol.21,No.5, p41~44.
  • Liumingquan, Zhangaiqin, Liyouhua. Pattern engineering of reconstruction the slope cropland.. 1992.: Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi, No.3, p18~21.
  • Lixuelian,Qiaojiping. Synthetic technology of fertilizing and improving production on the new terrace.. 1998.: Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi, No.3, p13~14.
  • Ministry of Water Resources of China. Terraces in China.. 1989.: The press of Jilin science & technology.
  • Wangxilong,Caiqiangguo,Wangzhongke. The consolidating function and economic benefit analysis of the terrace hedgerows in the hilly loess region of northwest Hebei Province.. 2000.: Journal of Natural Resources,Vol.15, No.1, p74~79.
  • Xuyuanxu.The surveying report of the terrace benefits in yanbian autonomous prefecture. 1995.: Water and Soil Conservation,No.4, p50~52.
  • Zhujianqiang,Lijing. Experimental study on soil compact characteristics and its shearing strength in changing slope field into terrace on south shaanxi province.. 2000.: ransaction of the CSAE,Vol.16, No.2, p36~40.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International